Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > IMAC
 Which kit? >

Which kit?

Community
Search
Notices
IMAC Discuss IMAC style aerobatics in here

Which kit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2004 | 09:31 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Maumee, OH
Default Which kit?

I would like to get a kit for a winter project that will be a good IMAC plane. I want this plane to work on precision and smoothness. I am a pretty good pilot and can do quite a bit of 3D, but I want to be smoother. Anyways, I want a bigger kit that would, at most, take a Saito 180 (I am not ready for gas yet) and that my wife would approve of based on price (I can probably get her to 200 maybe 250). The kits I am considering are GP Extra, Goldberg Extra, Lanier Extra 1/4, Lanier Laser 1/4, Lanier Cap, Lanier Sukhoi, Goldberg Sukhoi. The Laniers are the largest of what I have found, but I have been told they are builders kits. As this will be my 3rd kit, I do not want anything that will be too difficult. Of these kits, which would be my best bet? Also, are there any other kits I should look at? Thanks.....Dean
Old 11-01-2004 | 04:08 PM
  #2  
SLINGSHOT-RCU's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Timmonsville, SC
Default RE: Which kit?

GP Extra {Patty Wagstaf}
Old 11-01-2004 | 04:53 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Maumee, OH
Default RE: Which kit?

SLINGSHOT-RCU - Thanks, but I was looking at kits, not ARFs. But I have seen this plane and it does look great. Plus it is larger than what I am looking for now. Any thoughts on the kits I listed?
Old 11-01-2004 | 09:48 PM
  #4  
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: millbrook, NY
Default RE: Which kit?

Dean , I have seen the larger size laser from lanier fly and it is a real good flyer and lands well. Also be ready to buy lots of fuel for the saito 180 great engine but thirsty. I have built 3 Lanier kits 80" cap, giant stinger, and the latest 40% edge540, just take your time , read and understand each step and you will have no problems. Also one more item , stepping up to gas is great. The bigger planes fly so smooth and steady , if you want them to. So get the biggest beast you can fit in your transportation and have a blast.
Paul good luck
Old 11-01-2004 | 10:25 PM
  #5  
Flyfalcons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Bonney Lake, WA
Default RE: Which kit?

Have a look at the Midwest Extra, the build easily and fly great. You can power it with a Saito 180, then when you are ready for gas you can mount a gasser on it. I have a video of mine on my website. Nice kit.
Old 11-02-2004 | 08:19 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (197)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Minnetonka, MN
Default RE: Which kit?

Flyfalcons-

Is the Midwest extra stock and built per plans, or did you enlarge the elevator? What powerplant are you flying with?
Old 11-02-2004 | 09:30 PM
  #7  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Hawthorne, CA
Default RE: Which kit?

I was gonna say the Midwest Extra and the CA planes although they are closer to $300.

http://www.aero-works.net/store/detail.aspx?ID=195
Old 11-02-2004 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Maumee, OH
Default RE: Which kit?

Thanks for all the input, but most of these planes are either too large or more money than I am willing to spend right now. Maybe I will just go with an ARF. Maybe a Vector Flight.
Old 11-03-2004 | 10:50 PM
  #9  
Flyfalcons's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Bonney Lake, WA
Default RE: Which kit?

My Midwest is built stock, I just double beveled the elevators and rudder. I also replaced the spruce stringers with balsa to cut the weight down a little. My Midwest is powered with a Brison 3.2 spinning a Zinger 22x8 prop.
Old 11-11-2004 | 11:26 PM
  #10  
Bass1's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Va.Beach, VA
Default RE: Which kit?

The Goldberg Sukhoi with a Saito 150 is also a nice combo and an enjoyable build.
Old 11-12-2004 | 01:22 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Camarillo, CA
Default RE: Which kit?

I have an older Midwest Extra that is still in the box. I would be willing to part with it. If you are interested, pm or e-mail me and we can discuss. I would make it appealing to you as I am not going to build it since I have moved on to 100cc class planes.
Old 11-28-2004 | 12:47 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: el sobrante, CA
Default RE: Which kit?

Dean

I've been flying a Sig Cap 231ex arf with a YS 140 DZ for the last year . I bought it real cheap from a fellow club member w/o the engine or radio . It's been a great experieince for me but the lack of precision in alignment of the flying surfaces inspired me to look for something of a higher quality. I bought a Columbo Anderson Extra 300L 24% kit. It's built in the same manner as the higher end large IMAC planes with balsa sheeted foam core wings and tail feathers. The fuslage is built-up wood and the cowl and wheelpants are FG. All the flying surfaces are pre-sheeted. I haven't started building it yet but the quality I was looking for is there for sure. I think , in the end, I'll have as much in it as a good ARF but I'll be able to control the alignment prcess myself with my Robart Incidence gauge and a good level. By the way, this plane would be a good match for a Saito 180. I'll be putting my DZ in mine and I expect it weigh in at between 10-11.5 lbs according to some older RC Universe threads I read on this kit. Few, if any, of the ARF's actually come in this light no matter what the manufacturers claim.

To me, weight and alignment are the key ingredients in getting a good flying IMAC style plane.

Good Luck

Big Mike
Old 11-28-2004 | 01:16 PM
  #13  
RobT's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Syosset, NY
Default RE: Which kit?

Both the Goldberg Extra 300 and the Goldberg Suhkoi 26 would be great kit choices for a satio 180. I had the suhkoi with a satio 150. I sold it becuase it was a little lacking in power and didn't want to buy a 180. (lacking in power meaning Torque Rolls were at 90% power) But it had enough power to do the IMAC Advance sequence.

My Dad had the Goldberg Extra 300 with a YS 120 on it. Great power and VERY smooth for it's size.

But are easy to build . . . and build light.

Good luck
Rob
Old 11-28-2004 | 08:27 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St. Martinville, LA
Default RE: Which kit?

Columbo Andreson maks a smaller 24% version of the Extra 300L in a kit. It might be worth looking into. I have the 34% and it is a great flyer!
Old 12-06-2004 | 06:10 PM
  #15  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Fairbanks, AK,
Default RE: Which kit?

The Goldberg Extra-300 is excellent with the Saito-150 or Saito-180

Brent

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.