50 cc IMAC
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Munster,
IN
Whats a good 50cc IMAC "arf" plane.
Everyone talks how well their product 3ds but rarely talk about how well it tracks.
Looking for a winter project to replace my last glow plane.
Thanks
Everyone talks how well their product 3ds but rarely talk about how well it tracks.
Looking for a winter project to replace my last glow plane.
Thanks
#2

My Feedback: (42)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Garland,
TX
Columbo Andersson 27% Extra 300. Comes in at about 14lb with DA-50.
Snaps stop instantly when the sticks are released.
Not personally into IMAC/Pattern, but this one wouls do well, I'm sure.
Nice little ship. Glad I built one.
Snaps stop instantly when the sticks are released.
Not personally into IMAC/Pattern, but this one wouls do well, I'm sure.
Nice little ship. Glad I built one.
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (18)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: brownsburg,
IN
T-Bob how about AEROTECH
sorry couldn't resist...
I also have the Columbo Anderson 300l (kit built) and it has excellent tracking ability. Rudder authority stays very pronounced throughout the speed envelope. I am flying it with an old q-52xl and it will pull out a couple snaps on the up line without difficulty. I can't imagine the ARF being any different. Builds quickly too it can be finished in a month easily, a winter no problem, get the arf and be flying in no time.
sorry couldn't resist...I also have the Columbo Anderson 300l (kit built) and it has excellent tracking ability. Rudder authority stays very pronounced throughout the speed envelope. I am flying it with an old q-52xl and it will pull out a couple snaps on the up line without difficulty. I can't imagine the ARF being any different. Builds quickly too it can be finished in a month easily, a winter no problem, get the arf and be flying in no time.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (37)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ionia,
MI
I am flying a Laser 200 in the Basic class this year. It is doing okay but I think the CA mentioned earlier would do better. Whatever you buy try to get something with an airfoiled tail surface, it will track better, as I found out with the Laser. The laser has flat stabs and I stuggle with tracking smooth/flat lines as the tail ocilates slightly looking for home.
The H9 260 is a good flying airplane. I have flown it with a Moki 210. It does have all the right stuff. It is also set-up for a DA-50 from H9.
The H9 260 is a good flying airplane. I have flown it with a Moki 210. It does have all the right stuff. It is also set-up for a DA-50 from H9.
#9

My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Nampa,
ID
ORIGINAL: twostroker
I am flying a Laser 200 in the Basic class this year. It is doing okay but I think the CA mentioned earlier would do better. Whatever you buy try to get something with an airfoiled tail surface, it will track better, as I found out with the Laser. The laser has flat stabs and I stuggle with tracking smooth/flat lines as the tail ocilates slightly looking for home.
I am flying a Laser 200 in the Basic class this year. It is doing okay but I think the CA mentioned earlier would do better. Whatever you buy try to get something with an airfoiled tail surface, it will track better, as I found out with the Laser. The laser has flat stabs and I stuggle with tracking smooth/flat lines as the tail ocilates slightly looking for home.
Thanks
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (61)
ORIGINAL: Laserdude
No personal experience yet but I am eying the H9 Extra 260. I would like to get some reports from fliers that have one. However, it has all the right credentials.
No personal experience yet but I am eying the H9 Extra 260. I would like to get some reports from fliers that have one. However, it has all the right credentials.
Too small, too high of a wing loading, not nearly as "beefy" as the other 50cc planes.
The best 50cc ARFs :
Currently Produced NOT in order of preference:
EF Yak
Wild Hare Edge / Extra
BME Edge
TOC Yak / Extra /Edge
Comp Arf 2.3
Planes Plus pro Extra
Chip Hyde Vision
Chip Hyde Double Vision
About to be released
QQ Somenzini 84" Yak
BME Yak
BME Edge II (second gen)
There are others as well. I did not put the H9 on the list because I have seen it in person... a nice glow plane, but way too small and weak for a DA50, at least the way I like to fly.
The Columbo planes are ARCs (i.e. you need to cover them) the PP are full ARFs.
DP
#11

My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Nampa,
ID
ORIGINAL: desertpig
Too small, too high of a wing loading, not nearly as "beefy" as the other 50cc planes.
ORIGINAL: Laserdude
No personal experience yet but I am eying the H9 Extra 260. I would like to get some reports from fliers that have one. However, it has all the right credentials.
No personal experience yet but I am eying the H9 Extra 260. I would like to get some reports from fliers that have one. However, it has all the right credentials.
Too small, too high of a wing loading, not nearly as "beefy" as the other 50cc planes.
I was kinda thinking the same. I'm sure the H9 is a good one on glow but the extra weight of the gaser was a concern. Glad to hear another oppinion about that. Thanks
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (37)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ionia,
MI
Um...I was chicken to say that about the 260 but now that it was said I agree. It is funny how different some groups are than others because I have actually heard or read somewhere(here on RCU) that the 260 was over built.
Laserdude,
I am actually flying the Laser 2000 made by Kangke. It is powered by a BME 50. The plane/engine combo does a nice job for a basic pilot. Or should I say it does what I tell it to do...right or wrong. If I had a plane that knew what to do you guys would be in second place.
Laserdude,
I am actually flying the Laser 2000 made by Kangke. It is powered by a BME 50. The plane/engine combo does a nice job for a basic pilot. Or should I say it does what I tell it to do...right or wrong. If I had a plane that knew what to do you guys would be in second place.
#13

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Central Point,
OR
I have a great flying Aerotech 29% Velox Rev II. I think this 50cc plane is highly under rated. I have flown the basic and sportsman pattern with it and have found no bad habbits on this plane in the air for these patterns. I am having a blast with mine.
#16

My Feedback: (4)
Desertpig pretty much hit it. I love my EF Yak for fun flying but I am having issues with getting it to fly like all the Extras I have flown. However, I have not yet spent much time on setup, and I think I am a bit tailheavy and have way too much rudder throw for most IMAC type maneuvers.
Wildhare or CA/PP Extras look enticing for precision flying as well. Given the fact that I am on a limited budget and starting a 34% project, If the Yak ever goes in, I may replace it with one of these more economically priced planes...
Wildhare or CA/PP Extras look enticing for precision flying as well. Given the fact that I am on a limited budget and starting a 34% project, If the Yak ever goes in, I may replace it with one of these more economically priced planes...
#18
The EF YAK--or any of the lookalikes are good for a 50
The EF is my favorite
If you are on a tighter budget - go on EBAY and get one of the 280 buck Yak/
Extra/ EDGE - absolutely killer value.
They track and maneuver extremely well
It is ALL in the setup .
Best one
lowest wing loading highest power loading - all the rest is just not worth mentioning.
The EF is my favorite
If you are on a tighter budget - go on EBAY and get one of the 280 buck Yak/
Extra/ EDGE - absolutely killer value.
They track and maneuver extremely well
It is ALL in the setup .
Best one
lowest wing loading highest power loading - all the rest is just not worth mentioning.
#19
ORIGINAL: twostroker
I am actually flying the Laser 2000 made by Kangke. It is powered by a BME 50. The plane/engine combo does a nice job for a basic pilot. Or should I say it does what I tell it to do...right or wrong. If I had a plane that knew what to do you guys would be in second place.
I am actually flying the Laser 2000 made by Kangke. It is powered by a BME 50. The plane/engine combo does a nice job for a basic pilot. Or should I say it does what I tell it to do...right or wrong. If I had a plane that knew what to do you guys would be in second place.
IMO--the World Patty flies both sequence and 3D better than the Laser 2000. It's just lighter and has a better thrust/weight ratio. I have had them both set up for 3D and then re-programmed them for IMAC. I like the Patty better.
The Laser snaps easier--because of the high aspect ratio wing, and the wing loading. It's also harder to make it STOP snapping. It doesn't have the grunt for the Humpty Bump, Sharks Tooth, or the Cuban 8's. It even struggles with the loop, if I try and make it too big. It lands fatser, and doesn't have enough poop for great 3D. It tracks okay, but does over-rotate in aileron rolls and snaps--unless your quick

The World Patty is the best flying ARF I've ever had. But, consider that I've never flown many of the currently available models. I've had the Patty for 3-years--so it's what I'm used to flying. It is SUPER CRISP!!. It flies light and smooth. It tracks very solid. You just point it where you want to go and it GOES. It lands smooth, and does both 3D and sequence work nicely.
The Patty isn't the best 3D plane for me. It will do it. No problem. But maybe it's my nerves. Haven't got the guts to hover it down low or do ANYTHING too low to the ground. I usually keep it above 100' off the deck. Maybe it's the $$$
($1800)I prefer a cheaper 40 size glow plane for 3D stuff. Not so hard on the wallet if I smack it.[&:]
#20
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Green, Ohio OH
I too have an EF Yak and I love it. I also am having a hard time getting it tamed down for IMAC. In my first contest I had too much throughs and I struggled, I hope to do better this weekend. I have created a seperate model memory in my radio for IMAC. I hope to do better.
If you are looking for a new plane for IMAC, I would NOT suggest a 50cc size. I flew in sportsman class with my YAK and it was the smallest plane in that class. I feel that a 33-35% is the way to go. If I were looking at an IMAC specific plane (which I am) on a budget to build this winter (which I am) I would look no further than the GP Extra 330l (which I did). By the time I am done I will have less in this plane than I have in my YAK. I am sure there are other 33-35%ers out there, it might be worth a look.
Just my .02
If you are looking for a new plane for IMAC, I would NOT suggest a 50cc size. I flew in sportsman class with my YAK and it was the smallest plane in that class. I feel that a 33-35% is the way to go. If I were looking at an IMAC specific plane (which I am) on a budget to build this winter (which I am) I would look no further than the GP Extra 330l (which I did). By the time I am done I will have less in this plane than I have in my YAK. I am sure there are other 33-35%ers out there, it might be worth a look.
Just my .02
#21

My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Nampa,
ID
ORIGINAL: Ricmussman
I too have an EF Yak and I love it. I also am having a hard time getting it tamed down for IMAC. In my first contest I had too much throughs and I struggled, I hope to do better this weekend. I have created a seperate model memory in my radio for IMAC. I hope to do better.
If you are looking for a new plane for IMAC, I would NOT suggest a 50cc size. I flew in sportsman class with my YAK and it was the smallest plane in that class. I feel that a 33-35% is the way to go. If I were looking at an IMAC specific plane (which I am) on a budget to build this winter (which I am) I would look no further than the GP Extra 330l (which I did). By the time I am done I will have less in this plane than I have in my YAK. I am sure there are other 33-35%ers out there, it might be worth a look.
Just my .02
I too have an EF Yak and I love it. I also am having a hard time getting it tamed down for IMAC. In my first contest I had too much throughs and I struggled, I hope to do better this weekend. I have created a seperate model memory in my radio for IMAC. I hope to do better.
If you are looking for a new plane for IMAC, I would NOT suggest a 50cc size. I flew in sportsman class with my YAK and it was the smallest plane in that class. I feel that a 33-35% is the way to go. If I were looking at an IMAC specific plane (which I am) on a budget to build this winter (which I am) I would look no further than the GP Extra 330l (which I did). By the time I am done I will have less in this plane than I have in my YAK. I am sure there are other 33-35%ers out there, it might be worth a look.
Just my .02
What engine do you plan to use on the GP Extra?
Thanks
#22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (24)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Green, Ohio OH
LaserDude,
If I had the cash right now I would buy the 3w75 that is in the marketplace. I have yet to decide. I might look for a good used BME 100-106, or a good used 5.8 out there. I have heard that the FPE 5.8's are awesome. So, to answer your question, not sure yet. I only have one stab and elevator done right now. So I have a lot of time to decide.
If you have a suggestion I am game.
If I had the cash right now I would buy the 3w75 that is in the marketplace. I have yet to decide. I might look for a good used BME 100-106, or a good used 5.8 out there. I have heard that the FPE 5.8's are awesome. So, to answer your question, not sure yet. I only have one stab and elevator done right now. So I have a lot of time to decide.
If you have a suggestion I am game.
#23

My Feedback: (19)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rantoul,
IL
Hey Ric a buddy of mine had one with a ZDZ 80 on a can in his. Flew great. Had plenty of power for anything he could think of. He flies IMAC intermediate with it prior to changing out to the new WH 260. If you mount the motor at a 45degree it will put the can right down the center of the fuse. Check out Dick Hanson this is usually how he mounts his motors.
Chris
Chris
#24
My EF Yak and I, got sixth place at this years nats in sportsman, it was the smallest plane there, all the other's were 33-40%.
You are at a disadvantage with a smaller plane, but it can be done. I hope to fly intermediate with it later this year. I guess I just like a challenge.
You can't get any EF Yaks right now, but the QQ yak is coming out soon, and a beleive the same factory builds the QQ Yak, that builds EF.
You are at a disadvantage with a smaller plane, but it can be done. I hope to fly intermediate with it later this year. I guess I just like a challenge.
You can't get any EF Yaks right now, but the QQ yak is coming out soon, and a beleive the same factory builds the QQ Yak, that builds EF.
#25
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Indianapolis, IN
Hey Ric, guess I don't have to tell you how much I liked my GP 330L. If you can find a good used BME 102-105, that would be the perfect engine (light, powerful, very quiet using the stock mufflers).
I'll catch you this weekend's IMAC and see how you're doing with reduced throws on your YAK (there ARE some instances where more is not better).
I'll catch you this weekend's IMAC and see how you're doing with reduced throws on your YAK (there ARE some instances where more is not better).



