Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Reload this Page >

Sig Ryan STA

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Sig Ryan STA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2004, 10:26 PM
  #1  
hopkimf
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (56)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Batavia, IL
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Sig Ryan STA

I just bought this kit on RCU, and tarted construction. The plans show a copyright of 1971, and the servos look unusual. I believe this kit must have been out of production for sometime. My take on it after completing half of the fuse construction is that it's a well engineered kit, but will require quite a bit of work to complete.

Anyone have experience with this kit? I would welcome comments on building and flying. Thanks.
Old 11-21-2004, 11:28 PM
  #2  
MinnFlyer
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
MinnFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Willmar, MN
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: Sig Ryan STA

I can't comment on the Ryan, but just FYI, those servos shown are Kraft Servos. In the early 70's you'd be laughed off the field if you showed up with anything but a Kraft Radio.
Old 11-22-2004, 08:00 PM
  #3  
hopkimf
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (56)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Batavia, IL
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Sig Ryan STA

I found another thread where someone was complaining about the kit. Instructions, weight, etc. I have not had any problems so far. I am enjoying the build experience. It takes some work, and you need to read the plan.

One of my complaints on kit building is the GP or H9 style of kit. Everything is spelled out. The parts interlock together, just like a little puzzle. Not much sanding needed. No carving. No thinking. The finished product doesn't reflect any of the builder's skills. They are not needed. And, from my experience, the finished product is often too heavy, has strength where it isn't needed, and flies OK. It could be better and lighter with improved design.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.