Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
Which Covering Weighs Less?? >

Which Covering Weighs Less??

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Which Covering Weighs Less??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2002 | 09:36 PM
  #1  
jctpro's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Oakland, CA
Default Which Covering Weighs Less??

I am building a TF P-40 and want to keep it light when covering and painting. Any idea which of these come out weighing less:

Silk with dope and paint (Silk is .47 oz per yard)
Sig Koverall and paint (1.25 oz. per yard)
Coverrite Fabric and paint (3.1 oz per yard)
Glass with Resign and paint (.75 or 1.25 oz per yard)

The weights I can find are without paint. Any idea how much paint the different coverings take to fill the weave and get coverage? It seems silk will be the lightest but Koverall may be close once all is applied? Any ideas?

Any other options I missed?
Old 10-08-2002 | 12:17 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Default Which Covering Weighs Less??

Jct

I don't know which one is lightest. But I think much has to do with the paint preparation, and the application of the many coats needed to get to the projected finish.

Glass and epoxy, I have done a few times, it is nice but heavy.
two coats of epoxy, sanding, primer, sanding, application of panels line, final primer, base coat, colors, markings, stripes and then clear coat. On a TF P51 giant, it added up 3.5 lbs. But it is nice. 26 lbs dry. 3w60 for power.
I am working on a different project now. I am trying Koverall and paint in an effort to do away with the epoxy and a lot of sanding, and also save some weight.

Glass and epoxy up to a point can add some strenght to the structure if heavy enough but then it weights even more.

Ray
Old 10-08-2002 | 02:24 PM
  #3  
jctpro's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Oakland, CA
Default Which Covering Weighs Less??

I was hoping that Coverall would be lighter even after painting. I wonder if a combination would work well? The wing top covered in silk, the wing bottom and fuse with Coverall. Have you tried any combinations before?
Old 10-08-2002 | 02:58 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Default Which Covering Weighs Less??

Ho! am a little concerned about two types of covering on the same wing. Remember Koverall is a high shrink meterial.

I did fuselage one type and then wing a second, that was ok.

You can also visit s****.com they make a full scale covering for restoration and for model aircraft, they claim light and exact color.
After all that I decided Koverall and paint.

Ray
Old 10-09-2002 | 08:00 PM
  #5  
LQUAN's Avatar
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: El Monte, CA
Default Which Covering Weighs Less??

I use Coverrite Fabric on my P-40E (white). Used Top Flite abbrasive sponge to scratch the white paint real good. Painted it with Cheveron cammouflage. Added Top Flite flat clear coat. It did not seem to gain much weight. I particularly picked Coverrite Fabric was because it won't bubble like film which could cause the paint to chip easily after a few years. New paint will flex with the coverring real well when it is new. A few years down the line they will get brittle and chip if they surface flex often.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.