Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
 Control Surface Gap >

Control Surface Gap

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Control Surface Gap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-2006 | 07:13 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default Control Surface Gap

Finished my 4*60 kit, ran a couple of tanks of gas thru the engine. I think its ready to fly.

But.......I'm a little worried about my control surface gap. How much is too much and how would it affect the flight characteristics?

I used those du-bro nylon hinges instead of the CA hinges it came with and it looks like I've got a larger gap than my LT-40 with the CA hinges.

Also, I had to put an 8.5 oz block of lead under the engine and a 2 oz prop washer to get the thing to balance. The plane weighs 8.6 lbs dry. The book says the flying weight is 7-8 lbs so I'm a little heavy. I think I'm OK here but chime in if you get the urge.

Thanks!

Dave


Old 01-20-2006 | 07:44 PM
  #2  
johnvb-RCU's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: CanberraACT, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

Any gap at all makes a difference to the control surface response. I would try to get rid of the gap.

If you covered the model in film use a strip of film along the top surface. For example, on an aileron, push it down to full deflection, stick a strip of film down to the wing then across the gap and onto the aileron. Don't try to shrink it. When the aileron comes back up to neutral position the film should sit down into the gap sealing it off.

With the gap sealed there are a couple of advantages: the effect of the control surface is heightened, ie more powerful; and it helps stop control surface flutter at speed.
Old 01-20-2006 | 09:16 PM
  #3  
bhole74's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Anderson, MO
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

Those hinges will leave a larger gap due to their design, just seal the gap like John said.

What engine are you using? Sounds like you need to shift weight forward (battery, rx, servos) or need a bigger powerplant.
Old 01-20-2006 | 09:39 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

I'm using a GMS 76 and I mounted it according to the instructions (don't know better...).

I had to notch out the RH cheek for the muffler and put a hole in the LH cheek for the HS mixture control.

Otherwise, it'd be easy to shift the engine forward.

This is such a complicated hobby (I love it!) and I'll be smarter next time..........I hope.

Dave
Old 01-21-2006 | 07:18 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sarnia, ON, CANADA
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

D-LOCO;
You didn't mention the location of your battery & servos - if you can move these forward it will help your balance and weight problem.

As to the engine; If it is possible I'd move it forward too. The cowl can be recut to fit the muffler & mix control, if you are concerned about the existing holes -they can be patched.

A key factor to a good plane is to keep the weight DOWN! [:@]

Good Luck!
Old 01-21-2006 | 08:04 AM
  #6  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

Hi!
8.5oz is a lot of dead weight...let's see that's around 250g...wow!!
Get rid of it as fast as you can! And move all servos and batteries /receiver as far forward as possible.
A .76 engine in a .40 trainer????
No way! Way too much engine!

Gaps are not good! Just use a strip of plastic filmcovering (Oracover) an iron it down over the gap. See picture of my aileron on my Q-500 racer.


Regards!
Jan K
Sweden
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ki18874.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	30.4 KB
ID:	392049   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ec87691.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	50.0 KB
ID:	392050  
Old 01-21-2006 | 08:54 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Spartanburg, SC
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

Do what johnvb said, seal the hinge line on all control surfaces. Move everything you can forward. That's a LOT of dead weight, and I'm surprised it took that much! BUILD LIGHT!

Dr.1
Old 01-21-2006 | 09:19 AM
  #8  
bhole74's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Anderson, MO
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

Jaka, it is a .60 not a .40.

D-LOCO, It shouldn't be too hard to patch the hole in the cheeks, just fill the area with some scrap balsa and a little patch of covering. Let us know if you need help with it.
Old 01-21-2006 | 02:07 PM
  #9  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,816
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Upplands Vasby, SWEDEN
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

Hi!
Ooops!


Jan K
Old 01-21-2006 | 10:16 PM
  #10  
blw's Avatar
blw
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,449
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Opelika, AL
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

Jaka- the 4*60 is NOT a trainer!
Old 01-22-2006 | 06:39 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Leesburg, IN
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

For future reference...There's no reason to have any gap just because you are using the Du-Bro hinges. Simply cut a small section from the aileron tapered front edge where each hinge is located and this gets the surfaces as close as any CyA hinge can. I cover the stationary and control surfaces with a single piece of monokote, thereby eliminating any gap. Simply cover the wing - or stab - with the monokote, then extend the control surface - aileron or elevator or rudder - away from the surface being covered and iron the monokote to the vertical part of the TE and the LE of the aileron (for example) and then cover the rest of the control surface. Then repeat for the other side.
Old 01-26-2006 | 05:59 PM
  #12  
lownslo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default RE: Control Surface Gap

JLNewc has the correct idea. I have done this on all my planes. This photo is control surfaces from an LT 40 I crashed last June. It is getting an "ARF bashing" All my control surfaces done this way can get close to 0 gap....... But......... then they won't move correctly most times. I flex them to the throw I want before the glue sets. The gap opens up ohhhh so slightly, and this will now be very sufficient for most all applications. .........lownslo
PS. The other photo is my LT 40 in the works.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Li21311.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	50.2 KB
ID:	395932   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ca81018.jpg
Views:	69
Size:	98.0 KB
ID:	395933   Click image for larger version

Name:	Cx75321.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	50.2 KB
ID:	395934  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.