kit for .25 engine??
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chicago,
IL
I have Magnum .25 engine and don't know what to do with it....any kit that you would recommend?
How about Great Planes Taylorcraft 20??
#2
I don't know what your building experience is. However, the July 2007 issue of Fly RC (Issue #44) had pull out plans for a plane called the Blue Flash. It's a scratch build, but it looks to be fairly straightforward. I'm looking at building one sometime in the near future.
Tom
Tom
#4
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Abbotsford,
BC, CANADA
I've built a couple of the Great Planes Taylorcrafts. It's my favourite plane, and I hardly ever go to the field without it. I'd definitely recommend that one to anyone.
My first one had a Magnum .30 four stroke, and it flew very well like that. My current one has an Enya .46 four stroke, and it's overpowered. Your Magnum .25 should fly it very well.
My first one had a Magnum .30 four stroke, and it flew very well like that. My current one has an Enya .46 four stroke, and it's overpowered. Your Magnum .25 should fly it very well.
#6

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Manchester,
NJ
I built the G.P. T-Craft and powered with the O.S. 26 FS 4 stroke. IMO the engine doesn't have enough power to fly the plane well. Performance is improved somwhat if flown without the struts. The T-Craft IMO needs a minimum of a .30 4 stroke.
You may want to consider the G.P. Slowpoke .15. I built one and modified the wing to accept ailerons. Not a difficult modification and the plane is a good flier.
DaveB
You may want to consider the G.P. Slowpoke .15. I built one and modified the wing to accept ailerons. Not a difficult modification and the plane is a good flier.
DaveB
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chicago,
IL
how hard was to build the slow poke. I read one of the building descriptions and it didn't sound easy.
I like 60 and 60 size airplanes so I might just get rid of this engine...
I like 60 and 60 size airplanes so I might just get rid of this engine...
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chicago,
IL
scratchbuild might be too complicated. I'm pretty sure I can handle a kit but not schratchuild.
What I like about the .,25 engines is the fuel economy....
What I like about the .,25 engines is the fuel economy....
#12
ORIGINAL: mxaexm
how hard was to build the slow poke. I read one of the building descriptions and it didn't sound easy.
I like 60 and 60 size airplanes so I might just get rid of this engine...
how hard was to build the slow poke. I read one of the building descriptions and it didn't sound easy.
I like 60 and 60 size airplanes so I might just get rid of this engine...
The one comment about an "underpowered" model is using an engine with less power than your 25 two stroke.
I built the G.P. T-Craft and powered with the O.S. 26 FS 4 stroke. IMO the engine doesn't have enough power to fly the plane well.
#14

My Feedback: (102)
Consider the Sig LT25, just stack the parts together and apply glue, I've built two of them using only Hobby-Lobby's SuperPhatic. Flew one with a Saito .30 and the other with an Irvine .25 Diesel. I put a nose gear on the Saito powered one.
http://www.sigmfg.com/cgi-bin/dpsmar...FV4.html?E+Sig
http://www.sigmfg.com/cgi-bin/dpsmar...FV4.html?E+Sig
#16
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chicago,
IL
I was thinking of the LT 25 however many people were saying that .40 is barely enough for this airplane and that .25 would not fly it well.
#17
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Moore, OK
ORIGINAL: EF
You are very correct about the economy...I fly this Enya 25 model every week, usuall come home with more fuel than I went flying with
You are very correct about the economy...I fly this Enya 25 model every week, usuall come home with more fuel than I went flying with
#18

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Manchester,
NJ
Building the Slowpoke .15 is about the same as any other kit. Maybe a little more work considering the wing consists of 3 sections (center, left wing, right wing), and requires a little more time and effort to modify the wing as I did. The modified wing required cutting out additional ribs to maintain a constant cord, new spars and carving wing tips. That said, it's not hard, but is a little time consuming.
I had the same problem as you, in that I had an O.S. 26FS 4 stroke engine and was looking for a suitable plane. The T-Craft is a good airplane, but the .26 was too small. So now the .26 is powering the Slowpoke and is well suited for the plane.
Good luck what ever you choose.
DaveB
I had the same problem as you, in that I had an O.S. 26FS 4 stroke engine and was looking for a suitable plane. The T-Craft is a good airplane, but the .26 was too small. So now the .26 is powering the Slowpoke and is well suited for the plane.
Good luck what ever you choose.
DaveB
#19

A friend had the LT-25 with a TT .25 GP (plain bearing). It flew great on that engine, and he had a good time flying it in strong winds.
Who says a .40 is "barely enough"? He must like to make epoxy fillets. Either that or he think trainers should be able to hover.
Jim
Who says a .40 is "barely enough"? He must like to make epoxy fillets. Either that or he think trainers should be able to hover.
Jim
#20
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Abbotsford,
BC, CANADA
Here's a picture of my current Taylorcraft. This is the one with the Enya .46 four stroke. The prop in the picture is too big. I just put that on it for the picture.
There's a couple pictures in my gallery of my first one with the Magnum .30 four stroke.
There's a couple pictures in my gallery of my first one with the Magnum .30 four stroke.
#21
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fairfield,
CA
I second the taco. I've had one of those, and it was a blast. My 25fx is recently available again, and was thinking of building another one. I dumb-thumbed the last one. But, it was a ton of fun.
He's got a new 25 size out now too. I may try that one.
http://swanyshouse.com/
He's got a new 25 size out now too. I may try that one.
http://swanyshouse.com/
#22
ORIGINAL: carlosponti
that a kit or a scratchbuild?
ORIGINAL: EF
You are very correct about the economy...I fly this Enya 25 model every week, usuall come home with more fuel than I went flying with
You are very correct about the economy...I fly this Enya 25 model every week, usuall come home with more fuel than I went flying with
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Brandon,
MB, CANADA
ORIGINAL: buzzard bait
A friend had the LT-25 with a TT .25 GP (plain bearing). It flew great on that engine, and he had a good time flying it in strong winds.
Who says a .40 is "barely enough"? He must like to make epoxy fillets. Either that or he think trainers should be able to hover.
Jim
A friend had the LT-25 with a TT .25 GP (plain bearing). It flew great on that engine, and he had a good time flying it in strong winds.
Who says a .40 is "barely enough"? He must like to make epoxy fillets. Either that or he think trainers should be able to hover.
Jim
#24
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
ORIGINAL: mxaexm
I have Magnum .25 engine and don't know what to do with it....any kit that you would recommend?
How about Great Planes Taylorcraft 20??
I have Magnum .25 engine and don't know what to do with it....any kit that you would recommend?
How about Great Planes Taylorcraft 20??
The Taylorcraft would be perfect for that engine. It should fly with plenty of gusto, but not be ridiculously fast.
I had better pick up one of those Taylorcraft kits before they become extinct.
Now, if it only flies "for real" as well as it does in the Real Flight sim that I have.
Ed Cregger
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
I agree that the OS FS-26 would be marginal, but the engine he is going to use is a two-stroke .25 and will be a good deal stronger than even the OS FS-30.
I have the Slow Poke kit that you mentioned and I agree that it too would be a terrific choice.
Ed Cregger
I have the Slow Poke kit that you mentioned and I agree that it too would be a terrific choice.
Ed Cregger



