Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Kit Building
 Winter Project .60 Plane? >

Winter Project .60 Plane?

Community
Search
Notices
Kit Building If you're building a kit and have questions or want to discuss kit building post it here.

Winter Project .60 Plane?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2009 | 01:25 PM
  #51  
Eganwp's Avatar
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 759
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
Default RE: Winter Project .60 Plane?


ORIGINAL: Ilikebipes

FallDownGoBoom-
Part of the landing gear decision may be dictated by your engine choice. If you're going with a 60 sized engine/prop, you could build it with a trike set up. But if you're going to put in a 75 2S or 90 4S, you're almost forced to go with the tail dragger to get adequate prop clearance with a 13'' prop, especially on a rougher field.

Like the other folks, I'd probably go with a tail dragger.
Unless the gear is taller than the trike gear, there will not be any diferrence between the two. As the airplane rotates, the tail lifts to nuetral and you are at the same stance as the trike. The prop clearance issues stay the same.

Brian
Agreed, but the only exception to the rule is if you use lots of elevator with a 3ft takeoff into a vertical climb! haha My SS 40 with the OS 55ax does this easily, though not common place.

Ya thinking about it, I have very little issues with any of my tail draggers. As soon as you start adding in a steerable nose gear I can forsee issues. I think I'll build it a tail dragger as well, and most likely save the retract option for the next build since I'll have the plans.

I'll let you know when I get started. Today my nose is running like crazy from all the CA fumes last night, lol. (reinforced all the glue joints on my 30% Edge).
Old 11-06-2009 | 09:06 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Colbert, WA
Default RE: Winter Project .60 Plane?

Brian:

Agreed. But the longer gear legs required on a trike set up make the plane look like it's sitting waaaay off the ground all the time. On a tail dragger, I don't think you notice the added height as much. To me, its more a matter of appearance than anything else.

Fred
Old 11-07-2009 | 07:05 AM
  #53  
kdc
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Shenfield, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Winter Project .60 Plane?

Lots of people complained here about sanding, but to me shaping a plane from a rectangular box to a shapely plane is one of the magic parts of aeromodelling! It can be done in half an hour if you use a razor plane first. ( I havent yet built a US60, the plan is still in the post! I am talking about other similar models where the nose/ cowl needs shaping )
There are several tricks

1 Use a razor plane to start, with equal strokes on each side to get a symmetrical shape.

2 glasspaper should be fixed to a large block. The block is used in an arc which follows the intended shape of the curve. Again a few strokes 1 side then the other to keep symmetrical.

3 A Permagrit block is far better than glasspaper and quicker. It also seem to produce less dust, perhaps the ' granules' are larger, and no dust from the glasspaper itself. Expensive but you only really need 1 large block, double sided coarse and fine. ( I like the angle ended block )

4 Work outdoors to save clearing up!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.