Air Hogs Aero Ace!
#2376
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: st-jerome,
QC, CANADA
neurotex, is with your "spring wing" plane you got trouble with? did you try stop, by some way, the spring? maybe it's because your wing move in a unwanted way??
#2377
A couple weeks ago I lost an AA way up in the pines trees. I didn't think it would ever come down. It was a modified single wing and it flew great (except for usual A channel problems). Today, in the wind and rain, guess what my wife found in our driveway, on the other side of the house, about 150' away from the tree. It must have come loose, glided 70' and over the house, and another 80' to the spot where she found it.
As you look at the pictures, keep in mind that it was in perfect looking condition (good paint) when I lost it in the tree. I'll let it dry a couple days before cleaning it and trying it.
As you look at the pictures, keep in mind that it was in perfect looking condition (good paint) when I lost it in the tree. I'll let it dry a couple days before cleaning it and trying it.
#2378
ORIGINAL: MegaByte-2
Neurotex
Sounds like you have a handful. Higher winged planes are more stable as the weight below acts somewhat like a stable pendulum. That may help alot. Ever think abt undercambering the canard? It would hold way more lift at slow speeds.
Neurotex
Sounds like you have a handful. Higher winged planes are more stable as the weight below acts somewhat like a stable pendulum. That may help alot. Ever think abt undercambering the canard? It would hold way more lift at slow speeds.
will help.
ORIGINAL: novielo
neurotex, is with your "spring wing" plane you got trouble with? did you try stop, by some way, the spring? maybe it's because your wing move in a unwanted way??
neurotex, is with your "spring wing" plane you got trouble with? did you try stop, by some way, the spring? maybe it's because your wing move in a unwanted way??
it one bit. I hope to still use that thrust spring.
(I should move this back to micro's AA/X-Twin thread)
#2379
ORIGINAL: GTX SlotCar
As you look at the pictures, keep in mind that it was in perfect looking condition (good paint) when I lost it in the tree.
As you look at the pictures, keep in mind that it was in perfect looking condition (good paint) when I lost it in the tree.
#2380
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: lost coast,
CA
Gtx, why not switch the channel now that you have it back?
Also, when I was switching channels a couple of weeks ago, I got solder across all three pads. The rx would only take A ch commands. Perhaps that is the fix for the A channels. BTW, spinmaster does not believe they have a problem with the A ch or with bad transistors in the early 06 AA's. Ongoing negotiations with spinmaster, I'll tell more after we're done.
Also, when I was switching channels a couple of weeks ago, I got solder across all three pads. The rx would only take A ch commands. Perhaps that is the fix for the A channels. BTW, spinmaster does not believe they have a problem with the A ch or with bad transistors in the early 06 AA's. Ongoing negotiations with spinmaster, I'll tell more after we're done.
#2381
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: lost coast,
CA
Gtx, is that an entire lower wing glued on under the main wing?
Here are dreadful sketches of the cg finder I'm going to build. I'm going to take 1/8" ss, put a pair of rods parallel at 37.5 degrees, they will be attached to a base of some sort, or triangulated. This should allow me to put the airplane on the rods to determine CG. I think what was described in earlier post was a way to find center of mass. I had not thought of that before. Please note, the crappy drawings I made are very similar to what I get when I'm building prototypes or custom products. I guess I've learned to decode these things, and in the meantime am now used to drawing this way. Tim
Here are dreadful sketches of the cg finder I'm going to build. I'm going to take 1/8" ss, put a pair of rods parallel at 37.5 degrees, they will be attached to a base of some sort, or triangulated. This should allow me to put the airplane on the rods to determine CG. I think what was described in earlier post was a way to find center of mass. I had not thought of that before. Please note, the crappy drawings I made are very similar to what I get when I'm building prototypes or custom products. I guess I've learned to decode these things, and in the meantime am now used to drawing this way. Tim
#2383
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: lost coast,
CA
Sama, I tried to go to your site. I'll try again, but what is the cost for the canard (c) and sportster(b) package delivered to ferndale ca 95536? I found that package online in china a while back, but was unable to order it. Also, next week I'll get a mini-heli, 3 ch omni flight, indoor. I found that the manufacturer is willing to sell direct in case lots, 1 carton of 8 at a time. Assuming that hte heli is as good as I'm told it is, and that the typhoon is not in the area that produces this product, it could be a new item for you.
#2384
Ferndale
Your CG finder will only be accurate on finding the proper CG of a good flying model. In the example I posted on a gearless plane, it finds the CG. It is the center of mass, but it wont fly at that CG. So...lets say you build a plane, mount the gear and use the CG finder. If you havent gotten it set for a good test glide, the CG is a false one. Its not the flying CG. The CG on a good flying plane is actually the center of the mass + a bit forward weight to initiate the glide and prevent stalling.
Does that make more sense?
Tony
ARS Software & Innovative Solutions
http://www.falcon1.net/~ars/rcmodels.html
Your CG finder will only be accurate on finding the proper CG of a good flying model. In the example I posted on a gearless plane, it finds the CG. It is the center of mass, but it wont fly at that CG. So...lets say you build a plane, mount the gear and use the CG finder. If you havent gotten it set for a good test glide, the CG is a false one. Its not the flying CG. The CG on a good flying plane is actually the center of the mass + a bit forward weight to initiate the glide and prevent stalling.
Does that make more sense?
Tony
ARS Software & Innovative Solutions
http://www.falcon1.net/~ars/rcmodels.html
#2385
ORIGINAL: Neurotex
Looks like the squirrel's were nib'lin on it![:'(]
Looks like the squirrel's were nib'lin on it![:'(]
Gtx, why not switch the channel now that you have it back? ... is that an entire lower wing glued on under the main wing?
The lower wing is attached to the bottom of the upper wing with an overlap of 1/2". Double sided clear tape between the wings holds the entire seam, and short pieces of single sided clear tape reinforces the leading and trailing edges. I was going to attach them properly if this test configuration worked, but it worked so good that I didn't want to mess with it. The plane flies great. Smooth turns, stable, a real treat to fly.
I don't have any problem understanding your CG Finder drawings. Hey, I work on a CAD system every day, and I still do that type of drawing occasionally.
BTW, it wasn't as wet as I thought. It dried out already and I had to try it. It still works.
#2386
A few weeks ago, I made a canard glider out of a Jetstream rubber band airplane. The Jetstream looks a lot like the old Hornet RB powered planes I flew in the mid and late 50's, except the Hornet had red lettering and a red plastic canopy and pilot. It's a good flier and can go over my house. My son picked up a couple for us at a discount junk-type store for 2 bucks each.
I took off the prop and landing gear, turned the wings around and swapped the rudder and canopy. It's extremely stable as a canard glider. Descends in a gentle 15° slope. I was going to AA power it, but I thought the AA stuff would be too much weight for it. Might also be hard to get the CG right. I'd like to do it as a pusher, but even if I got everything else figured out, I don't know if I could get the motors close enough together so the turns would be gentle. Maybe facing the props outward a little would help.
I took off the prop and landing gear, turned the wings around and swapped the rudder and canopy. It's extremely stable as a canard glider. Descends in a gentle 15° slope. I was going to AA power it, but I thought the AA stuff would be too much weight for it. Might also be hard to get the CG right. I'd like to do it as a pusher, but even if I got everything else figured out, I don't know if I could get the motors close enough together so the turns would be gentle. Maybe facing the props outward a little would help.
#2387
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: North Yorks, UNITED KINGDOM
Guys 
Larger canard models (nearly?) always run with 1-2% positive incidence on the front wing(let) if it's fixed - i.e. a bit of 'up' at the leading edge - I believe this is to ensure that the front wing stalls earlier than the mainplane but I can't remember why this is important! [&:]
not very helpful really.....................[&o]
Ayrton

Larger canard models (nearly?) always run with 1-2% positive incidence on the front wing(let) if it's fixed - i.e. a bit of 'up' at the leading edge - I believe this is to ensure that the front wing stalls earlier than the mainplane but I can't remember why this is important! [&:]
not very helpful really.....................[&o]
Ayrton
#2388
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Yellow Springs,
OH
ORIGINAL: Ayrton S
Guys
Larger canard models (nearly?) always run with 1-2% positive incidence on the front wing(let) if it's fixed - i.e. a bit of 'up' at the leading edge - I believe this is to ensure that the front wing stalls earlier than the mainplane but I can't remember why this is important! [&:]
not very helpful really.....................[&o]
Ayrton
Guys

Larger canard models (nearly?) always run with 1-2% positive incidence on the front wing(let) if it's fixed - i.e. a bit of 'up' at the leading edge - I believe this is to ensure that the front wing stalls earlier than the mainplane but I can't remember why this is important! [&:]
not very helpful really.....................[&o]
Ayrton
Canards are pretty much stall-proof. That's one of the reasons the Wright Brothers survived long enough teaching themselves to fly that they were successful!
Flyer
#2389
ORIGINAL: MegaByte-2
Ferndale
Your CG finder will only be accurate on finding the proper CG of a good flying model. In the example I posted on a gearless plane, it finds the CG. It is the center of mass, but it wont fly at that CG. So...lets say you build a plane, mount the gear and use the CG finder. If you havent gotten it set for a good test glide, the CG is a false one. Its not the flying CG. The CG on a good flying plane is actually the center of the mass + a bit forward weight to initiate the glide and prevent stalling.
Does that make more sense?
Tony
ARS Software & Innovative Solutions
http://www.falcon1.net/~ars/rcmodels.html
Ferndale
Your CG finder will only be accurate on finding the proper CG of a good flying model. In the example I posted on a gearless plane, it finds the CG. It is the center of mass, but it wont fly at that CG. So...lets say you build a plane, mount the gear and use the CG finder. If you havent gotten it set for a good test glide, the CG is a false one. Its not the flying CG. The CG on a good flying plane is actually the center of the mass + a bit forward weight to initiate the glide and prevent stalling.
Does that make more sense?
Tony
ARS Software & Innovative Solutions
http://www.falcon1.net/~ars/rcmodels.html
just took it 1/3 back from the leading edge of the wing and went from there.
Then swept back wings and this canard threw me off.
[link=http://adamone.rchomepage.com/cg_canard.htm]CG calculator[/link]
[link=http://adamone.rchomepage.com/cg_calc.htm]CG finder[/link]
#2390
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Perth, AUSTRALIA
Well I went over to the "Brats" house all went well (He was asleep!) and his parents said they will tell me if they see the plane, in other words ive lost it and with it ive lost my prototype floats
hope the russians dont find my plane and steal my floats.[>:]
hope the russians dont find my plane and steal my floats.[>:]
#2391
neureotex;
You are right. With the straight wings, undercambered, Clark Y(flat bottom) , 1/3 from the leading edge would get you in the air.
But when it comes to canards, deltas and swepts.......out the window that goes!
There are massive calculations you can do for area, density of material....blah blah............modeling clay is easier!
If it'll glide, it'll fly.........
I did the 1/3 rule on my first delta, 10" SkyRay.....added clay, no gear, to the 1/3 rule. Gave it a chuck and it backed into the ground after the stall...........
From there on its just a history lesson.
Tony
ARS Software & Innovative Solutions
http://www.falcon1.net/~ars/rcmodels.html
You are right. With the straight wings, undercambered, Clark Y(flat bottom) , 1/3 from the leading edge would get you in the air.
But when it comes to canards, deltas and swepts.......out the window that goes!
There are massive calculations you can do for area, density of material....blah blah............modeling clay is easier!
If it'll glide, it'll fly.........
I did the 1/3 rule on my first delta, 10" SkyRay.....added clay, no gear, to the 1/3 rule. Gave it a chuck and it backed into the ground after the stall...........
From there on its just a history lesson.
Tony
ARS Software & Innovative Solutions
http://www.falcon1.net/~ars/rcmodels.html
#2392
ORIGINAL: GTX SlotCar
BTW, it wasn't as wet as I thought. It dried out already and I had to try it. It still works.
BTW, it wasn't as wet as I thought. It dried out already and I had to try it. It still works.
Once I got my mini Ventura stuck in a dead tree. Went back, got an axe and proceeded
to chop the tree down. (Needed a chainsaw!) After half an hour and only cutting about 6"
deep I gave up. Finally got it down by throwing the axe at it.
Got knocked on the head with a branch too [:@] but I got it!
What's the weight of that balsa glider and what's the wing area?
#2393
ORIGINAL: Neurotex
....What's the weight of that balsa glider and what's the wing area?
....What's the weight of that balsa glider and what's the wing area?
I still have a stock black/silver A channel in another tree. But I think it's a poplar, so it may come down this Fall. Hmmm... it could be down now, but there's too much undergrowth to search for it. It'll be easier spotting it late in the year.
#2394
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: canaan,
NH
Megabyte, the parts from your shop came in today, gotta find the glues that you mention, then I'll try soldering them in! Hope to have results over the weekend.
John
John
#2396
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: lost coast,
CA
megabyte, that that was what I asking. The tool I was going to build would give me a reference point to start from. I assumed that I would have to adjust from there. Right now I'm working on the 4 motor/2 battery AA. I destroyed a rx it appears, and have to decide which one is next on the hit parade. I will have to get voltages from the rx to the motors to make that call. I'll post the numbers.
Gtx, I have been threatening to buy some softair guns to knock down the planes for monthes. I guess it comes down to the accuracy of the gun. BTW, the corps certified me an expert rifleman, I'd love to to the qualifying thing again. Tim
Gtx, I have been threatening to buy some softair guns to knock down the planes for monthes. I guess it comes down to the accuracy of the gun. BTW, the corps certified me an expert rifleman, I'd love to to the qualifying thing again. Tim
#2397
ORIGINAL: FERNDALE AIR FORCE
.... BTW, the corps certified me an expert rifleman, I'd love to to the qualifying thing again....
.... BTW, the corps certified me an expert rifleman, I'd love to to the qualifying thing again....
I qualified with everything they'd let me shoot. M14, M16, 45, M60, grenade and quick kill. I think I'm leaving a couple things out. Quick kill was actually a Daisy BB rifle. That's where they toss the metal disc (like a silver dollar, but rusty) and you shoot it without aiming, just pointing. I qualified Expert with all of them. That was probably the only fun I had in the Army.
#2399
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Perth, AUSTRALIA
No the birds are the target or as they see it the AA is the target 
Ayrton S when you come to perth are you bringing your AA? becuase there is an idoor fly in, I think its in september I forgot. Also how would one go about finding an indoor location? Just going to random Gyms/warehouses and asking if they mind if you play your plane?

Ayrton S when you come to perth are you bringing your AA? becuase there is an idoor fly in, I think its in september I forgot. Also how would one go about finding an indoor location? Just going to random Gyms/warehouses and asking if they mind if you play your plane?


