MVVS .61 Tuned Pipe Question
#1
Thread Starter

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: brookings, SD
Pe or Dar,
I have aquired a NIB MVVS .61 engine less exhaust.
What is the performance & RPM difference in the 3250 long pipe assembly verses the 3253 short pipe assembly??
I see that Pe has them both in stock & want to order the best choice.
Thanks, Mike
I have aquired a NIB MVVS .61 engine less exhaust.

What is the performance & RPM difference in the 3250 long pipe assembly verses the 3253 short pipe assembly??
I see that Pe has them both in stock & want to order the best choice.
Thanks, Mike
#2
Senior Member
Mike,
The RPM difference on the same size prop, with the pipe adjusted to the optimum length would be 300-400 RPM.
This might seem like a small difference to you, but in HP terms this is ~9-12%, which are substantial.
This engine is designed to be at its best around 11K RPM and at optimum length, with the #3250 pipe it would spin an APC 13x8/13x9 prop around 10,800 RPM.
For an F3A flying style the full length pipe would be an excellent choice, but for optimum transition and response, the #3253 tuned silencer is a better choice for 3D style and sport flying.
The RPM difference on the same size prop, with the pipe adjusted to the optimum length would be 300-400 RPM.
This might seem like a small difference to you, but in HP terms this is ~9-12%, which are substantial.
This engine is designed to be at its best around 11K RPM and at optimum length, with the #3250 pipe it would spin an APC 13x8/13x9 prop around 10,800 RPM.
For an F3A flying style the full length pipe would be an excellent choice, but for optimum transition and response, the #3253 tuned silencer is a better choice for 3D style and sport flying.
#3
Senior Member
We have used this engine on a 4-star with the 3253 short pipe and 14x7 prop. Running 9600 rpm static, this was a very dependable combo with some power to spare.



