Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF > NitroModels Support
 40 pitts structural problem >

40 pitts structural problem

Community
Search
Notices
NitroModels Support Click here to have all your questions answered directly from the NitroModels support team.

40 pitts structural problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2007 | 04:03 PM
  #51  
opjose's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Poolesville, MD
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

Nice Stearman.

----

I flew my NM Ultimate 40S with a completely cracked interplane strut one time.

I didn't realize it had been broken during a botched landing, when I cartwheeled the plane over the field.

I was doing hard blenders and snap rolls with it this way.

I didn't even notice the damage until I had the plane on the ground!

Needless to say this area is now greatly strengthened.

---

Re: Hopping

Have you checked the tracking?

Normally this happens when the tail rudder is not consistent with the tail wheel.

e.g. you may actually need the tail wheel to point straight backward when the rudder is effectively applying a bit of rightward thrust.

Consider running the plane up and down the field, adjusting the wheel each time until the "hopping" tendancy stops.

I was all over the place with a few smaller tail draggers until I got the hang of offsetting the wheel correctly.

Old 04-28-2007 | 04:34 PM
  #52  
freeonthree's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Red Bluff, CA
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

My little super stearman has always liked to hop to a stop. My friends does it too. Im talkin about on the main wheels, not the tail wheel. It hops if I turn too sharp too. I've toed em in, out, and every which way with no improvement. Real short coupled biplanes have a tendancy to be a bit crazy on the ground. It's mainly because the landing gear is flexing, you can see it flexing when it hops. If your real careful, it can be avoided, but it's kinda tricky. The shorter they are, the worse they handle on the ground. The Pitts should be fun too ! The longer planes don't do that at all...
Old 04-28-2007 | 06:48 PM
  #53  
opjose's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Poolesville, MD
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

Ah, ok... I get you.

Yeah, did this today with my Brio 10 too.

Jumping like a rabbit...

Old 04-28-2007 | 06:56 PM
  #54  
freeonthree's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Red Bluff, CA
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

Brio 10 ? Was that a real plane ? Never heard of it...
Old 04-28-2007 | 07:02 PM
  #55  
opjose's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Poolesville, MD
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

The E-Flite Brio .10 sized electric. A small pattern plane.

It too hops like mad. Especially with the long thin landing gear.

Old 04-28-2007 | 07:25 PM
  #56  
freeonthree's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,769
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Red Bluff, CA
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

Thats a cute little plane... Bet it flies great ! Im just hooked on four strokes. I won't even own a 2 stroke plane. I got rid of my heli because it had a 2 stroke on it. lol Now I wanna put a 4 stroke on my Revo ! That should be a dandy trick, and require alot of gearing.
Old 06-13-2008 | 10:49 AM
  #57  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Weeki Wachee, FL
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

O.K., I gotta ask. If the mfg says cg is 4" from top leading edge, how can the BUILDER shange where the cg is.

I thought you need to add weight to balance the plane where they say the cg is with a small amount of varience.

Never heard of changing where the c.g. is.

I put 2.25 oz. of weight in the tail end, and it balances great at 4", just a hint of nose down which should be perfect.

Any suggestions.


Hank
Old 06-13-2008 | 11:19 AM
  #58  
opjose's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 12,624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Poolesville, MD
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem


ORIGINAL: bertnhank

O.K., I gotta ask. If the mfg says cg is 4" from top leading edge, how can the BUILDER shange where the cg is.

I thought you need to add weight to balance the plane where they say the cg is with a small amount of varience.

Never heard of changing where the c.g. is.

I put 2.25 oz. of weight in the tail end, and it balances great at 4", just a hint of nose down which should be perfect.

Any suggestions.


Hank
The C.G. is where ever it actually is, no matter what the manufacturer says.

It's "at" the point where the plane balances ( OR shows NO preference for nose or tail after many tries... ).


You can affect the C.G. point by moving components around. The easiest to move is the battery pack. Fortunately the battery tends to be a heavy item, relatively speaking, so moving it behind the canopy will move the C.G. towards the tail.

The manufacturer RECOMMENDED C.G. is NOT absolute either.

You can have the C.G. spot on and still find that the plane is too tail heavy, etc.

You are always better off setting the C.G. slightly forward of the recommended for safety and working backwards after you've put a few flights on the plane.

Old 10-24-2008 | 06:21 AM
  #59  
Crashtruk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brisbane RAMAC, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

Update
I was flying my pitts (with Hitec HS81's) Doing fun aeros. I heard a POP and my top wing was flying away without the rest of the plane[X(]. The plane does fly with just the bottom wing ,I hit max power, flew a circuit and bought the plane in for a hot landing. Not a scratch on it. There was a round of applause from my club mates. I needed a sit down and a can of Coke after that one I can tell you. My top wing landed gently in the long grass and was undamaged. I have almost completed repairs and she will fly again soon. Check your struts and wing attachment points.
Old 02-19-2012 | 07:09 AM
  #60  
mike early's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,106
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ashland, KY
Default RE: 40 pitts structural problem

I just ordered this plane. On sale for $79 with an additional 6% off with coupon codes. I wonder if anything has improved in the last 3-4 years since anyone commented..

Will power it with a Saito .72. Will try to prevent the top wing from flying off....

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.