Kat 70 vs. MoJo 60
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Franklin,
LA
Well it's like this. I have an Ultra Stick 60 with a .61 FX and standards.
I'v decided to not stuff that motor into a smaller 40 size profile.
It's between the MoJo 60 and the Kantana 70.
I saw a comparison on *PB* between the two and they came out equal. I'm in a difficult situation right now and building is OUT of the question. If I took the MoJo route I'd have to get it built.
I think for K.I.S.S. purposes I should just get the Kat 70 ARF. I flew the smaller Kat and I know everone sais it's more agile. Is the Kat 70 still more agile than say a UCD? I know its better at 3D.
Thanks
Happy early 4th of July
I'v decided to not stuff that motor into a smaller 40 size profile.
It's between the MoJo 60 and the Kantana 70.
I saw a comparison on *PB* between the two and they came out equal. I'm in a difficult situation right now and building is OUT of the question. If I took the MoJo route I'd have to get it built.
I think for K.I.S.S. purposes I should just get the Kat 70 ARF. I flew the smaller Kat and I know everone sais it's more agile. Is the Kat 70 still more agile than say a UCD? I know its better at 3D.
Thanks
Happy early 4th of July
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
While I prefer the Mojo, The UCD is not even in the same class as either one! I have had both and I liked the flight qualities of the Kat, I wasn't impressed with the build quality. I may be spoiled at this point because I have also had the EF Edge profile which pretty much set the bar in build quality. I still prefer the Mojo over the Kat though.
Matt
Matt
#3
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orlando,
FL,
Spend a little more and get the Mojo .60 built. Swany's planes are so tough, it greatly decreases the pucker factor, allowing you to try stuff you probably shouldn't, and get away with it. The Kat .70 is a real nice plane, too, from all reports. Truthfully, I haven't flown either. I have a Mojo .40 and a Kat .40. The Kat flies nice, but it ain't no Mojo. Had one minor dork with the Kat, which resulted in fairly major repairs. I've dorked the Mojo about a hundred times, learning to torque roll 1 foot off the ground, where I learn all new maneuvers. The cumulative effect of all these dorks is about the same as the one dork with the Kat. Do you want to do major repairs after 1 dork or 100?
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (19)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Evansville, IN
I have owned the Kat 70 and have many flights on this one and all it took is one flight on a mojo 60 to tell you it's a better flying 3D airplane. The Kat snaps a little cleaner and holds a line better but the mojo 60 is simply impressive in inverted and upright harriers. The Kat "might" have been slightly easier to harrier roll. The mojo will hold up WAY better than the V1 Kat 70
#6

My Feedback: (6)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Georgetown,
IN
I have flown both, you cannot go wrong with either. If you do not want to build go with the kat 70 as they are on sale right now for like 165 through accel.
Jeff Williams
Jeff Williams
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Franklin,
LA
Thanks guys for all the input. It looks like I'm gonna try and get a MoJo built. will a .61 FX and standards be all right in it? I have digitals on my UCD but they need to stay there.
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (97)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Billings,
MO
If your going with the Mojo 60. I'd recommend some higher torque servos. Some cheap ones that would work are hitec 475's they've got 70+ oz. on 6V. I don't think standards would be wise. The control surfaces are pretty big...........
#10

My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hagerstown,
IN
The MoJo 60 is the baddest profile on the planet! The Big MoJo deserves the most powerful and fastest servo you can afford. I'm using four Hitec 945s You will be rewarded with exceptional 3D performance.
Victor
Victor
#11
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orlando,
FL,
ORIGINAL: fasterthanlife
I have digitals on my UCD but they need to stay there.
I have digitals on my UCD but they need to stay there.
#13
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Franklin,
LA
no well the digitals are staying with the saito 180 in case I get another fatty.
I think now I'm gonna just get a smaller 40 size ARF. My whole goal was to keep it cheap for a knock around plane. and if I get the MoJo I don't wanna cheat it on the servos. So I'm thinking I'm gonna try an Accel Kantana 40 for the .61 and see how it goes. Would an OMP Edge arf or Yak arf 40 size balance any better?
Thanks
I think now I'm gonna just get a smaller 40 size ARF. My whole goal was to keep it cheap for a knock around plane. and if I get the MoJo I don't wanna cheat it on the servos. So I'm thinking I'm gonna try an Accel Kantana 40 for the .61 and see how it goes. Would an OMP Edge arf or Yak arf 40 size balance any better?
Thanks
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Manhattan,
NY
So I'm thinking I'm gonna try an Accel Kantana 40 for the .61 and see how it goes. Would an OMP Edge arf or Yak arf 40 size balance any better?
#17

My Feedback: (3)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Beavercreek, OH,
Probably not one right now except for the Kat 70. Only the V1 is available now, but as mentioned in the other thread, the version 2 will be available later this summer.



