Community
Search
Notices
Profile and Fun Flying Planes If you're a profile fan or into fun flyers than this is the forum to discuss those topics.

fun51 engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2007 | 09:32 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Niangua, MO
Default fun51 engine

im building a fun 51 dont know what engine i should it on as far as power and weight i have a 40& 46 la and a super tger 45 but didnt know witch would be best ?
Old 07-23-2007 | 09:59 PM
  #2  
My Feedback: (35)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: fun51 engine

I flew the fun 51 with a ST45 and it performed very well.
Old 07-24-2007 | 05:20 AM
  #3  
paulsen's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default RE: fun51 engine

I would go with the LA40 since the plane is so light and get longer runtimes then the LA46. The Super Tiger is pretty heavy (about 6oz heavier! ) especially for a plane this size.
Old 07-24-2007 | 07:56 AM
  #4  
flightcrazed's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Gainesville, FL
Default RE: fun51 engine

I had a TT46 on mine, it would have hovered if the rudder and elevator were a little bigger.. If I were building another I would extend them both about an inch.. If your not looking for it to hover, built as is it'll KE all day, I'd put the 40 on it. If you modify the rudder and elevator, put the 46 on it. Just my $.02.
Old 07-24-2007 | 07:16 PM
  #5  
PA BEN's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chewelah, WA
Default RE: fun51 engine

A size 40 would be fine. I put a evolution 46 on mine way over powered.

Old 07-25-2007 | 01:30 AM
  #6  
troposcuba's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Incirlik, TURKEY
Default RE: fun51 engine

got the ST .45 on mine. the plane and engine were given to me free. the guy was sick of fixing where the landing gear mounts to the fuse (and had ripped itself clean a couple times) i think i got that prob whooped. the engine ran horribly when i got it. i tore it down (thinking it was junk) and found no damage really. just a ton of varnish. cleaned it, lubed it re-assembled and it runs much better. not what i would call perfect but at least acceptable. runs great in the mid to high rpm. and the plane flies awesome. almost unlimited vertical. it stops going up eventually, but i get bored going straight up and have to do something before it tops out anyway.

check out the crazy repairs i did to reinforce that weak point where the landing gear attaches. I think it will take on anything now. check out the re-construction thread [link=http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_6091745/tm.htm]here[/link]
Old 07-27-2007 | 01:41 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Niangua, MO
Default RE: fun51 engine

thanks guys, info sure helped now time to start wings
Old 07-27-2007 | 01:43 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Niangua, MO
Default RE: fun51 engine

nice lookin 51 pa ben
Old 07-29-2007 | 02:50 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St Louis, MO
Default RE: fun51 engine

I just finished a Fun51. It has a ST 40 however I used the small ST muffler. The larger
ST muffler extends over the landing gear and that could be a problem on a ploop
landing. It has about 10 or 15 flights and I like it a lot. I'm concerned about the
vibration in the nose. I use a balanced 11x4 MAS prop. Its a great flyer.
Old 08-01-2007 | 07:00 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: High Ridge, MO
Default RE: fun51 engine

I put an OS 46 in the one I built for my son. It performs great.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Fc90115.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	118.9 KB
ID:	733572  
Old 08-14-2007 | 05:47 PM
  #11  
MikeMc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Union City, CA
Default RE: fun51 engine

I had the LA40 on mine and it was more than enough power. Good times.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Mk26931.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	112.9 KB
ID:	742166  
Old 03-07-2008 | 04:33 AM
  #12  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: MelbourneVIC, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: fun51 engine

I have put an OS 55 AX on mine...
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv64929.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	152.1 KB
ID:	896884  
Old 03-07-2008 | 05:32 PM
  #13  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lancaster, WI
Default RE: fun51 engine

DITTO on the AX55-opps, this ain't a fun fly. Same thing though. 46AX with a 12.25x3.75 prop so nice-55AX with the same only better.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ax72728.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	47.2 KB
ID:	897160  
Old 06-04-2009 | 11:41 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NE, TX
Default RE: fun51 engine

Question guys, when you covered your Fun 51, did you cover the fuse, ailerons, tail parts individually? I've got everything but the fuse and wing covered and was wondering if it would be better to cover the fuse and then slide the wing in, glue the wing and then finish covering the wing?
Old 06-05-2009 | 11:23 PM
  #15  
jimmyjames213's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: L
Default RE: fun51 engine

im building one, covering everthing before i assemble. i think i will have a problem w/ the servo heads hitting the fues as i slide it over (servo's installed before covering.

im putting a old os 40 fp in the plane. hopefully it will have enough power
Old 06-22-2009 | 01:07 AM
  #16  
jimmyjames213's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: L
Default RE: fun51 engine

just a update for anyone that may read this,
 i put a gms.47 in mine i didnt like it. it was to nose heavy even w/ the engine as far back as possible and the plane would not harrier/float what so ever, it just wanted to stall when i slowed it down even w/ flaperon at 15 degrees.
w/ the fp i need 1 oz up front and the engine as far forward as possible to balance. it flies very well both w/ and w/o flaperons, you can slow it waayyyyy down which is really cool.
i think the os 46 la would be perfect, the 40fp (similer to 40 la) can almost hover on a apc 11x5 (going to try 12.25x3.75), and i bet you wouldnt need the oz up front to balance
Old 06-22-2009 | 01:08 PM
  #17  
Constrictor's Avatar
My Feedback: (46)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Marionville, MO
Default RE: fun51 engine

Ys .63 oughtta be perfect.
Old 07-20-2009 | 09:18 AM
  #18  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Waseca, MN
Default RE: fun51 engine

I started with a Webra 40 black head and it wasn't enough. Went to the OS .46fx which was plenty, but needed a bunch of tail weight to get it to tumble how i liked. It did an awesome climbing inverted spin. With its short moments, it tumbles pretty good and knife edge loops are a breeze, it just doesn't hove or harrier all that well. Fun plane, got lots of flights on mine.
Old 07-31-2009 | 07:10 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, OH
Default RE: fun51 engine

I flew a Fun 51 with a Norvel 40 bb engine. Plenty of Power.
Old 09-05-2009 | 12:35 AM
  #20  
FlyFanatic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default RE: fun51 engine

What do you guys think about a OS 56 fs-a ?
Old 09-07-2009 | 08:40 PM
  #21  
jimmyjames213's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: L
Default RE: fun51 engine


ORIGINAL: FlyFanatic

What do you guys think about a OS 56 fs-a ?
it should be fine, ground clearence should be ok im running a 12x4 or 12.25x3.75 and have enought clearence.
Old 09-07-2009 | 10:05 PM
  #22  
FlyFanatic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Minneapolis, MN
Default RE: fun51 engine

sounds good, I will find out shortly...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.