using deflection on ailerons
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
using deflection on ailerons
in real terms im pretty much a beginner in flying traits etc and can anyone help me with trying to stop tip stalling with my max thrust mx2 by using deflection on the ailerons and how much
#3
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sailing in the Eastern Caribbean
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
If you had ailerons that were out towards the tip then adjusting them both up about 3 to 5 degrees provides some help.
However the model you have has ailerons that are nearly full span and the above would not work.
Moving the CofG forward a little can help a little.
Models of this general type are often designed so that they will snap roll, unfortunately this does mean that a tip stall is always possible.
However the model you have has ailerons that are nearly full span and the above would not work.
Moving the CofG forward a little can help a little.
Models of this general type are often designed so that they will snap roll, unfortunately this does mean that a tip stall is always possible.
#5
My Feedback: (29)
Brian, adding differential will actually help avoid a tip stall. A tip stall occurs when the wing reaches it's max AOA and the tip stalls before the rest of the wing. On an aerobatic model with no washout having differential means that the downward aileron has less travel then the upward aileron and can balance out the stall somewhat. It's always the aileron with the downward movement that creates the stall. Flaperons is the last thing you would want to do, some guys run spoilerons to help with stalling at low speeds. this is bringing both ailerons up a few degrees. It is something that has been catching on more frequently with the pattern guys. As far as why the tip stalls are happening in the first place, my hunch is that the airplane is set up too nose heavy and has excessive elevator movement to compensate. A good test for the OP to try is to do a full elevator loop at 1/2 power. if the airplane snaps out of the loop it's a good indication that too much elevator throw is being used. It the airplane requires a lot of elevator to flair for a landing then it's too nose heavy.
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i did mean deflection ie the ailerons are set about 5mm up from normal level position to the rest of the wing forming a sortof washout to each wing
i will take on board what you say about differential many thanks
i will take on board what you say about differential many thanks
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes many thanks for your help and advice as soon as weather permits i will try out these manouvers i will set up again after test runs to see how it loops as for the landing im pretty certain it never wants to flair out more like wants to keep flying then i suppose its flying too slow and a stall happens
#9
My Feedback: (29)
If you plan to go the spoileron route I would not make it a permanent adjustment. I would set it up on a switch so that you could click to landing mode. You would not want to be flying that airplane around with the ailerons reflexed all the time. For that airplane I consider this a band aid. It's not fixing the actual problem. As I stated earlier, I think you are too nose heavy. You are most likely having to hold a fair amount of elevator at landing speeds. As the speed drops off your elevator becomes less effective so you give it more. At one point your elevator just gives up and that is your stall. Calculate out where your CG is, for that airplane it should be close to 30% of the average cord. An example is, go out halfway on the wing. If the cord there is 9" then the CG should be 3" from the wing leading edge at that point. I would be willing to bet you are farther forward then that.
#10
My Feedback: (1)
JCW The various methods already covered by the fellows to soften the stall departure is quite accurate and specifically reflexing the ailerons up just a few degrees up above the intrail position on the wing will help it is nothing more than doing the same thing as using wash out on the trailing edge and it will work even with strip type ailerons as well as bn doors, without a doubt it is the easiest to experiment with if experiencing and unpleasant stall departure after confirmation you simply do not have to much elevator through as outlined above by Jester, I think.
Now while I would not start attaching appendages on your aileron a better approach and one used often in the full scale world is to attach a simple stick on the wing root leading edge. Best example I can think of is all versions of the Mooney aircraft us a foot long triangular strip at the very font of the airfoil profile. Its purpose is to trip a stall at the wing root before the wing tip region. And yes I have used this method successfully on a few model aircraft it does work. This method accomplishes exactly the same thing a Washing out a wing tip or reflexing both ailerons up from the in trail position in neutral.
John
Now while I would not start attaching appendages on your aileron a better approach and one used often in the full scale world is to attach a simple stick on the wing root leading edge. Best example I can think of is all versions of the Mooney aircraft us a foot long triangular strip at the very font of the airfoil profile. Its purpose is to trip a stall at the wing root before the wing tip region. And yes I have used this method successfully on a few model aircraft it does work. This method accomplishes exactly the same thing a Washing out a wing tip or reflexing both ailerons up from the in trail position in neutral.
John
#11
Senior Member
JCW The various methods already covered by the fellows to soften the stall departure is quite accurate and specifically reflexing the ailerons up just a few degrees up above the intrail position on the wing will help it is nothing more than doing the same thing as using wash out on the trailing edge and it will work even with strip type ailerons as well as bn doors, without a doubt it is the easiest to experiment with if experiencing and unpleasant stall departure after confirmation you simply do not have to much elevator through as outlined above by Jester, I think.
Now while I would not start attaching appendages on your aileron a better approach and one used often in the full scale world is to attach a simple stick on the wing root leading edge. Best example I can think of is all versions of the Mooney aircraft us a foot long triangular strip at the very font of the airfoil profile. Its purpose is to trip a stall at the wing root before the wing tip region. And yes I have used this method successfully on a few model aircraft it does work. This method accomplishes exactly the same thing a Washing out a wing tip or reflexing both ailerons up from the in trail position in neutral.
John
Now while I would not start attaching appendages on your aileron a better approach and one used often in the full scale world is to attach a simple stick on the wing root leading edge. Best example I can think of is all versions of the Mooney aircraft us a foot long triangular strip at the very font of the airfoil profile. Its purpose is to trip a stall at the wing root before the wing tip region. And yes I have used this method successfully on a few model aircraft it does work. This method accomplishes exactly the same thing a Washing out a wing tip or reflexing both ailerons up from the in trail position in neutral.
John
#12
My Feedback: (29)
Agreed but with one exception. The MX is an aerobatic model. Reflexing the ailerons will have an adverse effect while the model is being flown inverted. The stall strips on the inboard wing will raise the stall speed of the airplane overall. IMO the OP really should not resort to adding such fixes to an airplane that is simply not trimmed correctly ( CG ). Personally I would like the OP to come back and let us know what % the CG is currently. I'm 99% sure this is the actual issue.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THANKS VERY MUCH TO YOU ALL FOR HELP AND IDEAS MY CURRENT C ofG AS YOU HAVE SAID IE AT ROOT CORD 12" HALF W/S 24 SO AT 12" THE CORD IS 9" AS YOU HAVE SAID MY C ofG BALANCED AT THAT POINT BUT 31/4 FROM LEADING EDGE
#18
My Feedback: (1)
Originally Posted by [email protected]
in that case would it be ok to glue some strips on the top of the outer ends of ailerons to form a sort of wash out say 100mm long
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My main prob is that on finals im finding the model just wants to fly on then as my airspeed falls its wanting to tip stall i fly and land on a pretty small patch and iam trying to stop overshooting as i the models suffer with u/c damage in the long grass or is there a better solution for a clean landing
#22
My Feedback: (29)
Originally Posted by [email protected]
My main prob is that on finals im finding the model just wants to fly on then as my airspeed falls its wanting to tip stall i fly and land on a pretty small patch and iam trying to stop overshooting as i the models suffer with u/c damage in the long grass or is there a better solution for a clean landing
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WOW some fling site and what a lovely blue sky i take it you were flying the all red Extra and very well i might add im way down the list in ability to get near to flying like that but yes point taken and with my mx2 i will do as you suggest moving the c of g back a little at a time untill i achieve what you seem to be doing ie coming in tail low many thanks and best regards John
#24
My Feedback: (29)
Thanks John. I refer to myself as a " Lifer " having grown up around R/C and have been flying for almost 40 years. As you slowly work the CG back don't forget to reduce elevator travel as well. I would suggest you use no more then 15 degrees. If your radio has the expo feature I suggest setting that to about 20%-25% as well. Some radios will allow you to set both positive and negative expo so be careful on that. What expo does is reduce the amount of throw around center. Something you may already know about but just in case.