Coverings
02-07-2005, 11:43 AM
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: millville,
UT
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coverings
Hey guys, which is better, Sig coverall or the tried and true Ultracote. Covering a Sig 120 4 Star. Looking at the LOUD Neon Green for high visability. I know Iknow, it's tacky but it's just getting harder to see the darn things on some days.. Please advice on the quality of the Sig coverall. Thanksabunch, MM.
02-07-2005, 11:53 AM
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Quinlan,
TX
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Coverings
MM,
I've used both quite a bit and found them both to be excellent. I can't recommend one over the other, but they are both easier to use than Monokote. I think you'll be happy with either one.
Good luck,
Paul
I've used both quite a bit and found them both to be excellent. I can't recommend one over the other, but they are both easier to use than Monokote. I think you'll be happy with either one.
Good luck,
Paul
02-07-2005, 12:20 PM
#3
My Feedback: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Coverings
SIG Koverall is excellent for larger planes, however, it has no adhesive and no finish. You need to apply it with dope or SIG Stix-it and paint it. It costs a lot less than Ultracote. Latex paint works well, and your local paint store can mix up any color you can think of. There are several threads on both Koverall and latex paint you may find helpful. Good luck.
