Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Questions and Answers
Reload this Page >

weight verse performance and durability

Community
Search
Notices
Questions and Answers If you have general RC questions or answers discuss it here.

weight verse performance and durability

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2006, 10:58 AM
  #1  
andrew wisc.
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: milton, WI
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default weight verse performance and durability

want your opinions . is it generally true that a heavier plane will have lower performance than the same plane and set up that
is heavier. at what point does the aircraft suffer in durability being lighter. also the heavier the aircraft the hotter it will have to
land and more fuel will be used to maintain same performance. what do you think?
Old 12-23-2006, 11:18 AM
  #2  
Deadeye
Senior Member
 
Deadeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Dutton, MT
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: weight verse performance and durability

Lighter is better for most cases. However, there is something to be said about heavier planes. They handle the wind better, and tend to be more forgiving on those less than perfect landings. This is assuming the extra weight was added to strengthen key areas like the LG block.
Old 12-23-2006, 12:03 PM
  #3  
meaden
Senior Member
 
meaden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Decatur, GA
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: weight verse performance and durability

My Sig Kougar is 6lb (after I put it on a diet) the upper limit of the kit recommendation. Before, the airspeed needed to be high to keep it flying and it had to land way to hot because the wing loading was so high. It flys fine at 6lb but if I could shave another 8oz off it it would be much more crisp flying and land slower.

Shaving 8oz off doesn't seem like much, but for a 6lb plane that's 1/12th it's weight. If you shave 1/12th the weight off someone that's 180lb that's 15lb. So small amounts of weight can make a huge difference as they add up. 8oz is probably the extra coat of primer and paint I put on it.
Old 12-24-2006, 04:59 PM
  #4  
ELTIGRE
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: BERNVILLE, PA
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: weight verse performance and durability

lighter is nearly aways better.heavier planes must fly faster & at higher AOA inorder to develope same lift & will stall at higher speeds.acceleration is slower, landing speed is increased as is fuel consumption.full size planes handle noticably different when fully loaded than when empty. It is a myth that heavier planes "handle " wind better.that is a function of many factors including design. true, they may not get pushed around as much by gusts, BUT, lighter planes recover faster from any disturbances caused by wind etc.in fact if you suddenly encounter cross wind or tail wind (like downwind turns), the heavier weight will work against you. in placing aerobatic manuevers it is posible to be somewhat too light if precision is required. heavier only absorbs landing stress if the weight goes into reinforcing the gear. lighter planes land slower so the overall mean stress level is the same.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.