Speed Measuring?
#26
oh yeah, when i did the speed calculator for my rc18t, it said top speed is 76mph without any tire ballooning.
that little car is RAW, even going in a straight line is hard to do, you have to BABY the throttle up to top speed (which i havent found enough room to top it out[X(]) i punched it from a stand still, and it two seconds, it spun, did a front flip and shot off two tires.
funny thing its only a 4500KV motor with a 28 pinion and 57 spur, but 600watts!! and i still cant gear it down
ok, i'll get off my pedestal
that little car is RAW, even going in a straight line is hard to do, you have to BABY the throttle up to top speed (which i havent found enough room to top it out[X(]) i punched it from a stand still, and it two seconds, it spun, did a front flip and shot off two tires.
funny thing its only a 4500KV motor with a 28 pinion and 57 spur, but 600watts!! and i still cant gear it down

ok, i'll get off my pedestal
#27
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: milbrae,
SK, BANGLADESH
@ shark,
that calculator should have tossed a warning/note at you that above 40-45 it's going to be off as air drag is a huge factor as you get faster
I'm sure your RC is fast, but it's not 76 mph fast
that calculator should have tossed a warning/note at you that above 40-45 it's going to be off as air drag is a huge factor as you get faster
I'm sure your RC is fast, but it's not 76 mph fast
#28
ORIGINAL: sloppyG
@ shark,
that calculator should have tossed a warning/note at you that above 40-45 it's going to be off as air drag is a huge factor as you get faster
I'm sure your RC is fast, but it's not 76 mph fast
@ shark,
that calculator should have tossed a warning/note at you that above 40-45 it's going to be off as air drag is a huge factor as you get faster
I'm sure your RC is fast, but it's not 76 mph fast
the calculation was also without ballooning.
ive been around rc's for awhile, and when a 3.3 4-tec looks slow, you know its cookin.
#30

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
ORIGINAL: sloppyG
it won't work in a car
it's a pitot tube speed sensor, it's for planes
ORIGINAL: Moontan13
Interesting device! Works with telemetry and data logging too. Verrry nice!
ORIGINAL: cremation101
try this http://www.eagletreesystems.com/Stan...standalone.htm
seen these and they seem to work well
try this http://www.eagletreesystems.com/Stan...standalone.htm
seen these and they seem to work well
it's a pitot tube speed sensor, it's for planes
<br type="_moz" />
#31
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: milbrae,
SK, BANGLADESH
the pitot tube won't work properly in a car, it's going to get odd readings as it's so close to a solid object (the ground)
and the slower you're going, the larger the error is going to be.. these things were designed to measure aircraft speed and to be accurate in a range of speeds that are much higher than most RC cars are going
and the slower you're going, the larger the error is going to be.. these things were designed to measure aircraft speed and to be accurate in a range of speeds that are much higher than most RC cars are going
#33
ORIGINAL: The_Shark
i bet money on that sir. it does atleast 70 no less, the car is also teeny tiny and i have it slammed to the ground with the biggest battery it will fit.
the calculation was also without ballooning.
ive been around rc's for awhile, and when a 3.3 4-tec looks slow, you know its cookin.
ORIGINAL: sloppyG
@ shark,
that calculator should have tossed a warning/note at you that above 40-45 it's going to be off as air drag is a huge factor as you get faster
I'm sure your RC is fast, but it's not 76 mph fast
@ shark,
that calculator should have tossed a warning/note at you that above 40-45 it's going to be off as air drag is a huge factor as you get faster
I'm sure your RC is fast, but it's not 76 mph fast
the calculation was also without ballooning.
ive been around rc's for awhile, and when a 3.3 4-tec looks slow, you know its cookin.
#34

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
ORIGINAL: sloppyG
the pitot tube won't work properly in a car, it's going to get odd readings as it's so close to a solid object (the ground)
and the slower you're going, the larger the error is going to be.. these things were designed to measure aircraft speed and to be accurate in a range of speeds that are much higher than most RC cars are going
the pitot tube won't work properly in a car, it's going to get odd readings as it's so close to a solid object (the ground)
and the slower you're going, the larger the error is going to be.. these things were designed to measure aircraft speed and to be accurate in a range of speeds that are much higher than most RC cars are going
You know what, now that I think about it...you want the pitot-static probe LOW and out in front so you can call wind effects negligible. Haha, way to use all of your fluid dynamics courses there, Victor! Guess I shoulda thought it through the first time!! Oh well. Point is:
PItot-Static probe low and forward will give you great readings!!
<br type="_moz" />
#35

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Greenville, SC
ORIGINAL: DaveG55
Also, if I understand airspeed correctly, a radar gun will not give an aircrafts airspeed but it's groundspeed instead.
Also, if I understand airspeed correctly, a radar gun will not give an aircrafts airspeed but it's groundspeed instead.
<br type="_moz" />
#36
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aurora, CO
I think I found one nearly perfect for my needs:
http://www.radargunsales.com/Speedtr...adar-unit.html
It's not handheld, but rather tripod mounted.
http://www.radargunsales.com/Speedtr...adar-unit.html
It's not handheld, but rather tripod mounted.
#39
Senior Member
ORIGINAL: Moontan13
I was thinking of a used one via Ebay.
I was thinking of a used one via Ebay.
http://shop.ebay.com/?_from=R40&_trk...All-Categories
Saves you all of $33 over a new one with a guarentee
ORIGINAL: sloppyG
this is the best economical way, unfortunately I get the feeling most people would rather spend $100 than do 3 minutes worth of math
this is the best economical way, unfortunately I get the feeling most people would rather spend $100 than do 3 minutes worth of math
#41
ORIGINAL: sloppyG
yeah, it seems like people are willing to go through a lot of trouble and expense to avoid doing 3 math calculations
yeah, it seems like people are willing to go through a lot of trouble and expense to avoid doing 3 math calculations
me, i dont care about actual speed, if its a blur, rips off the tires and takes off like a jet, its fast enough for me.
#42
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Aurora, CO
It's not the math. Even if I thought I could operate a stopwatch and a r/ccar, there's no way I could do that while flying a heli. Good method for little wood cars rolling downhill though.
#43
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: milbrae,
SK, BANGLADESH
ORIGINAL: Moontan13
It's not the math. Even if I thought I could operate a stopwatch and a r/c car, there's no way I could do that while flying a heli. Good method for little wood cars rolling downhill though.
It's not the math. Even if I thought I could operate a stopwatch and a r/c car, there's no way I could do that while flying a heli. Good method for little wood cars rolling downhill though.
I think it is the math




