Cold Air Intake
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hell, ND,
Is that what the tube from the bottom of the carb going back into the engine is? Me and my Dad were stumped last night when we were looking at my RC Car Action.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: santa clarita,
CA,
I second that, I would bet money thats for a boost bottle. Boost bottles are fairly popular with 2-stroke motorcyle/atv engines, but have to be pretty carefully matched to the engine to work correctly. They are designed to prevent excessively uneven idle and low-throttle running as a result of a fuel/air "backwash" from the downward stroke of the piston. Basically, they store mixed fuel/air between the carb and the intake channel of the crankshaft and smooth out idle and low-mid throttle response. The idea is to get performance up before the engine comes "on the pipe" and the pipe starts to handle the fuel/air on the exhaust side. Like I said, it works well when set up right on bigger engines, but I doubt it will have much effect on an R/C motor.
As a disclaimer, I do not have an engine that uses a boost bottle, and nobody I race with uses one, so I can't say that i have any first-hand experience with them in an R/C application.
I too would save up the dough to buy the screamer engine and not waste cash on a cold-air intake that may or may not make much difference. Get a solid powerplant, get it tuned, and focus on driving skill, its free and it will make you a hell of a lot faster than a cold air intake will.
As a disclaimer, I do not have an engine that uses a boost bottle, and nobody I race with uses one, so I can't say that i have any first-hand experience with them in an R/C application.
I too would save up the dough to buy the screamer engine and not waste cash on a cold-air intake that may or may not make much difference. Get a solid powerplant, get it tuned, and focus on driving skill, its free and it will make you a hell of a lot faster than a cold air intake will.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Fairfax, VA,
I don't think its even possible to put more air into the engine than it takes normally as it can just go right out the other side. Even if it did work it would just raise the compression, nothing you can't do by just removing a shim.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: santa clarita,
CA,
Originally posted by KyleSch
I don't think its even possible to put more air into the engine than it takes normally as it can just go right out the other side. Even if it did work it would just raise the compression, nothing you can't do by just removing a shim.
I don't think its even possible to put more air into the engine than it takes normally as it can just go right out the other side. Even if it did work it would just raise the compression, nothing you can't do by just removing a shim.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: santa clarita,
CA,
speaking of boost though, I've designed a few turbo systems for full-size cars, and I can't help but wonder about forced induction on an r/c engine. A turbo would probably not be useful with a carb and FAR too intensive to manufacture, but a positive displacement "screw-type" blower might be possible. Anyone ever tried this?



