FEJ Gulfstream G550 is ready!
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (75)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oceanside,
CA
The test flights are done and we are taking orders on them now. You can see all the details at flyeaglejet.com
under the Gulfstream. I have been working with them for over a year on this and I am happy to say all time and effort has paid off. The detail is beautiful and will fly with a full range of motors. I am having trouble posting pictures (as many of us are) but I will get James to put a few up tomorrow. Take a look at the web site....it's all there.
Thanks,
Lowell
under the Gulfstream. I have been working with them for over a year on this and I am happy to say all time and effort has paid off. The detail is beautiful and will fly with a full range of motors. I am having trouble posting pictures (as many of us are) but I will get James to put a few up tomorrow. Take a look at the web site....it's all there.
Thanks,
Lowell
#2
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (75)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oceanside,
CA
Forgot to mention, the plane is 130" Long and 133" WS!
Will fly with P-80's thru K140's. The test model had P-80's and will be retro fitted with K140's and shipped to me in about 3 weeks. Can't wait to get my hands on it!!
Lowell
Will fly with P-80's thru K140's. The test model had P-80's and will be retro fitted with K140's and shipped to me in about 3 weeks. Can't wait to get my hands on it!!
Lowell
#5
ORIGINAL: FenderBean
Deff a lazy day flyer, minus the size
very cool!
Deff a lazy day flyer, minus the size
very cool!
Can't wait to see the pix and video.
#6
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (75)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oceanside,
CA
It's a floater Dantley! The thing fly's great and very predictable. Your right though...it is a bit big. But then again, big does fly better!!
It will be around here flying at the shows. You need to come down and check it out!!
Lowell
It will be around here flying at the shows. You need to come down and check it out!!

Lowell
#10

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Kensington, MD
Hi All:
Here are some photos about Gulfstream.
Lowell,your first one is under paint job now.
Test video:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OgZKh2jVjo[/youtube]
Thanks
James
Here are some photos about Gulfstream.
Lowell,your first one is under paint job now.
Test video:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OgZKh2jVjo[/youtube]
Thanks
James
#16
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (75)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oceanside,
CA
ORIGINAL: snobird
Will it fly at Florida Jets 2013
Will it fly at Florida Jets 2013
Jeff, thanks. I can't wait to get it here.
G4, no offense taken. We try to make it look as good as we can. Paint will help!
Falcon, I think the paint will cover the lines. Thanks for the rest!
Corndog2, bigger is better! It has a great presence in the air.
David, I just ordered a bigger trailer!!
Thanks to all. It's really great to have worked with FEJ on this project. They did more than I could have asked for. Thenk you James and the entire factory.
Lowell
#17

My Feedback: (37)
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: elizabeth, NJ
ORIGINAL: G4guy
They need to fix the cockpit windows, they are just not right. I hope the critiques aren't taken wrongly, just some observations.
They need to fix the cockpit windows, they are just not right. I hope the critiques aren't taken wrongly, just some observations.
Yes I am 100% with you they need to fix the window
#18

My Feedback: (24)
ORIGINAL: mario tavarez14
Yes I am 100% with you they need to fix the window
Yes I am 100% with you they need to fix the window
Its a good start, but to really be the best, the shape of the nose itself needs to be tweaked, the windows need to be shaped correctly, and the size of the vortex generators needs to be reduced...
Bob
#21
I bet this thing could fly better on a lot less power than shown here. Not for any other reason than it would allow lighter weights, and it's not like you will miss the vertical in a 900 foot loop with smoke, right?? The approach speed is a bit too fast to look right, and a lighter weight setup would help there. Unlike an A-10 or other types with a fat trainer type wing these type of jets have razor thin airfoils - so to slow down and fly scale like on approach, even with complex slotted flaps etc... it has to be lighter. I'm not sure of the prototype's weight to begin with, maybe you need all that power due to the type of construction but I think these types of jets can easily fly on .6:1 thrust to weight based on my experience with these types of designs - almost half the drag of a fighter straight and level and a third of the drag in a turn (depending on comparison of course)
I really like the size. To do the G550 justice with turbine it has to be bigger like it is.
Looks like it's a really nice setup in the making. Agreed with the other comments on the cockpit - it needs a tweak here and there for window arrangements, certainly. Nice job guys.
I really like the size. To do the G550 justice with turbine it has to be bigger like it is.
Looks like it's a really nice setup in the making. Agreed with the other comments on the cockpit - it needs a tweak here and there for window arrangements, certainly. Nice job guys.
#24

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: townsend,
GA
The shapes of the front windows are correct. They only look small because the outer frame on the model is painted. On the full size they are usually polished making the window look a bit bigger. Look closer to the frame in post #18. They even got the spacing of the HSTB-409 hi-shear fasteners correct. The vortex generators on the real one only extend up ¼” or so. Also there is not aileron trim tab on the right wing. I know all this because I am sitting in the hangar where they are made, and have been servicing the G550 since it entered service. Overall I am very impressed with the work you guys did.
#25
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (75)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oceanside,
CA
ORIGINAL: rhklenke
Yea, we just had a similar conversation with Ija about his 727 model - if the nose of an airliner (or large business jet), is off, it really sticks out - more than on other types of aircraft it seems.
Its a good start, but to really be the best, the shape of the nose itself needs to be tweaked, the windows need to be shaped correctly, and the size of the vortex generators needs to be reduced...
Bob
ORIGINAL: mario tavarez14
Yes I am 100% with you they need to fix the window
Yes I am 100% with you they need to fix the window
Its a good start, but to really be the best, the shape of the nose itself needs to be tweaked, the windows need to be shaped correctly, and the size of the vortex generators needs to be reduced...
Bob
As for the removable front, it's the only way to get in there to install the cockpit. Again, it should look better when fitted and painted properly.
Thank you all for the comments. We do look at the plane constantly to see what we can do to make it better.
Lowell



