Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
JetCat P80SE Methane Fuel Conversion >

JetCat P80SE Methane Fuel Conversion

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

JetCat P80SE Methane Fuel Conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2014 | 08:58 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default JetCat P80SE Methane Fuel Conversion

Hello everyone,

My senior design team and I are in the process of converting a JetCat P80SE to run on methane rather than the recommended 1-k kerosene fuel. We are in the research stage right now and are attempting to really understand how the P80SE works. We found a "How its Made" video on the turbine and it helped us a lot (Model R/C Turbines). Several aspects of the turbine are a bit blurry to us at this point.
  • We are having trouble finding much information on the materials used in the combustion chamber, specifically the fuel injectors. Since methane burns so much hotter than kerosene (approximately 1900 C vs 1030 C), we can only assume we will be required to re-engineer the combustion chamber as well as the fuel injectors to function under higher thermal loads. Could anyone help us out on the exact materials used in the P80SE combustion chamber?
  • Furthermore, methane requires more energy to ignite due to it's molecular properties. Would you suggest looking into new glow plug designs in order to combat the higher ignition energy and if so what kind should we look into?
  • The manual suggests adding 5% synthetic oil to the fuel. We know in some turbines, fuel is used as a journal bearing to lubricate the space between shafts, therefore the synthetic oil is added. We found the bearing system in the P80SE is just two sets of stainless-ceramic hybrid ball bearings. Does the fuel ever come in contact with the ball bearing system?

Any thoughts, suggestions, or questions are absolutely welcomed!

Thanks!

Last edited by Dan Reilly; 09-14-2014 at 02:03 PM.
Old 09-14-2014 | 09:27 AM
  #2  
AndyAndrews's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,147
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Little Rock, AR
Default

Why don't you just call JetCat and ask them?
Old 09-14-2014 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,072
Received 187 Likes on 160 Posts
From: Morehead City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by AndyAndrews
Why don't you just call JetCat and ask them?
That was not very helpful, Andy.
Old 09-14-2014 | 10:38 AM
  #4  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: ovr, PORTUGAL
Default

Jetcats Combustion chamber and fuel vaporizers are made in inconel alloy.and the tip of
vaporizers,where the fuel burns,sufer to much erosion.
Old 09-14-2014 | 10:42 AM
  #5  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: harwich, UNITED KINGDOM
Default

be careful you don't know who these people are. if they are working with the air force why come here
Old 09-14-2014 | 11:34 AM
  #6  
speed is life's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Redstone, CO, USA
Default

Methane? The methane generating system might be a bit bulky to fit in a normal size model.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	127.1 KB
ID:	2031877  
Old 09-14-2014 | 12:33 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (85)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 494
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Not saying this is the case, but this is how information is obtained soforeign sources can steal technology.

I receive this type of requests for information about UAV's, by email every day, it looks innocent, but many times it is not.

Most of all of this stuff is on the internet, plus the poster does not provide enough information about were they are from, what college, etc.
Old 09-14-2014 | 01:31 PM
  #8  
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lost Wages, NV
Default

Dan,

I have a suggest for you, hire another "Design Team" if they can't figure out what they are looking at after dissecting apart a turbine. Coming to RCU for advice is the most preposterous thing an Engineer or head of a "Design Team" could do. I have a suggestion, why doesn't your "Design Team" actually design something on their own, spend some of your government grant money on a thing called Research & Development or R&D for short, instead of trying to steal another manufacturers technology? Seriously, coming on RCU looking for answers on such rudimentary questions like does the bearings come in contact with fuel? When your top designer took apart the turbine did he find a wet sump system with cooling radiators to lubricate the bearings? Geesshhh....

Ghostrider1 out!!
Old 09-14-2014 | 01:44 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We've been trying to contact them. No responses yet, but we keep trying.
Old 09-14-2014 | 01:47 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Everything we are working with isn't classified.

Last edited by Dan Reilly; 09-14-2014 at 02:06 PM.
Old 09-14-2014 | 01:52 PM
  #11  
jason's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,370
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: kenilworth , UNITED KINGDOM
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Reilly
Hello everyone,

  • We are having trouble finding much information on the materials used in the combustion chamber, specifically the fuel injectors. Since methane burns so much hotter than kerosene (approximately 1900 C vs 1030 C), we can only assume we will be required to re-engineer the combustion chamber as well as the fuel injectors to function under higher thermal loads. Could anyone help us out on the exact materials used in the P80SE combustion chamber?
Thanks!
As the hot end of your engine is made of both the stainless and inconel which melts at about 1500 deg I'd give up.

Jason
Old 09-14-2014 | 01:54 PM
  #12  
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,072
Received 187 Likes on 160 Posts
From: Morehead City, NC
Default

Originally Posted by bluescoobydoo
be careful you don't know who these people are. if they are working with the air force why come here
Really???
Old 09-14-2014 | 02:09 PM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hmjets
Jetcats Combustion chamber and fuel vaporizers are made in inconel alloy.and the tip of
vaporizers,where the fuel burns,sufer to much erosion.
Thank you sir!
Old 09-14-2014 | 02:15 PM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GhostRider 1
Dan,

I have a suggest for you, hire another "Design Team" if they can't figure out what they are looking at after dissecting apart a turbine. Coming to RCU for advice is the most preposterous thing an Engineer or head of a "Design Team" could do. I have a suggestion, why doesn't your "Design Team" actually design something on their own, spend some of your government grant money on a thing called Research & Development or R&D for short, instead of trying to steal another manufacturers technology? Seriously, coming on RCU looking for answers on such rudimentary questions like does the bearings come in contact with fuel? When your top designer took apart the turbine did he find a wet sump system with cooling radiators to lubricate the bearings? Geesshhh....

Ghostrider1 out!!
Hey thanks for the constructive criticism!
Old 09-14-2014 | 02:47 PM
  #15  
FalconWings's Avatar
My Feedback: (57)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,998
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
From: Fort Worth, TX
Default

Your problems are not the internal mettalic materials. Your issues will lie
on using a thermocouple rated for your expected EGT and reprogramming the ECU for the specific energy of methane, and pbly improving insulatiin of components inside the cowl.

You need help from JetCat for sure, and that comes at a cost. I would start with an RFI/RFP to JetCat or Dreamworks RC if you are serious.

David
Old 09-14-2014 | 03:20 PM
  #16  
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil
Default

I'm curious, Why you wanto to do this conversion?
Old 09-14-2014 | 04:35 PM
  #17  
mr_matt's Avatar
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Oak Park, CA,
Default

The combustion chamber is some alloy of iconel. I can't remember if the needles are on a P-80.

The details of the chamber design control gas flow so who knows how it will run on methane. At least you don't have to worry as much about atomizing the fuel.

If it is hard to ignite you can use a spark plug or a piezo ignitor.

The fuel system is designed to send some fuel/oil mix into the bearing tunnel. You can inject some sort of lube into the same inlet port, could use compressor pressure to force the lube in, many of the first hobby turbines used this technique.
Old 09-14-2014 | 04:37 PM
  #18  
mr_matt's Avatar
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Oak Park, CA,
Default

As David said Jetcat does a lot of customization for industry and government so just generate an RFQ for what you need. I would address that to JetCat in Germany.
Old 09-14-2014 | 11:58 PM
  #19  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Norfolk , UNITED KINGDOM
Default

Are you really sure about the temperatures you quote?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabat...me_temperature

John
Old 09-15-2014 | 08:05 AM
  #20  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: harwich, UNITED KINGDOM
Default

wren already sell engines for schools,uni's etc try them
Old 09-15-2014 | 09:22 AM
  #21  
toolmaker7341's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lockport, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Dan Reilly
Hello everyone,

My senior design team and I are in the process of converting a JetCat P80SE to run on methane rather than the recommended 1-k kerosene fuel. We are in the research stage right now and are attempting to really understand how the P80SE works. We found a "How its Made" video on the turbine and it helped us a lot (Model R/C Turbines). Several aspects of the turbine are a bit blurry to us at this point.
  • We are having trouble finding much information on the materials used in the combustion chamber, specifically the fuel injectors. Since methane burns so much hotter than kerosene (approximately 1900 C vs 1030 C), we can only assume we will be required to re-engineer the combustion chamber as well as the fuel injectors to function under higher thermal loads. Could anyone help us out on the exact materials used in the P80SE combustion chamber?
  • Furthermore, methane requires more energy to ignite due to it's molecular properties. Would you suggest looking into new glow plug designs in order to combat the higher ignition energy and if so what kind should we look into?
  • The manual suggests adding 5% synthetic oil to the fuel. We know in some turbines, fuel is used as a journal bearing to lubricate the space between shafts, therefore the synthetic oil is added. We found the bearing system in the P80SE is just two sets of stainless-ceramic hybrid ball bearings. Does the fuel ever come in contact with the ball bearing system?

Any thoughts, suggestions, or questions are absolutely welcomed!

Thanks!
So answer the questions Where are you located and what school is this for. NO idenity NO info

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.