JR 945 Receiver
#3

My Feedback: (44)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mother Earth, the Sunny side!
We have used the JR 940, 945, 950, and the 955 with no prblems at all. We have used them with base loaded antennas and with stock antennas in turbine jets with not a single failure.............yet, knock on wood!!!!
I personally prefer the dual conversion 940 and 945. Just make sure your installation is correct.
I personally prefer the dual conversion 940 and 945. Just make sure your installation is correct.
#5
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sparks, MD
I'm not sure who you talked to at Horizon but I would ask you to re-confirm your information.
There are many receivers at Horizon and perhaps there is a misunderstanding. The 945 is a current prooduct of Horizon and there are no plans to discontinue the 945 for many years.
Here is a link to the Horizon site for more product information.
http://horizon.hobbyshopnow.com/prod...Prod=JRPR945**
Additionally, the main difference between the 940 and 945 is the SMT (Surface Mount Technology). SMT allows the use of smaller components hence reducing the potential for vibration type failures. The RF internals are very similar to the 940 and performance evaluations are identical.
Kind regards
Peter Goldsmith
Horizon Hobby
There are many receivers at Horizon and perhaps there is a misunderstanding. The 945 is a current prooduct of Horizon and there are no plans to discontinue the 945 for many years.
Here is a link to the Horizon site for more product information.
http://horizon.hobbyshopnow.com/prod...Prod=JRPR945**
Additionally, the main difference between the 940 and 945 is the SMT (Surface Mount Technology). SMT allows the use of smaller components hence reducing the potential for vibration type failures. The RF internals are very similar to the 940 and performance evaluations are identical.
Kind regards
Peter Goldsmith
Horizon Hobby




