Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread) >

ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2005 | 02:15 PM
  #76  
c/f
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
From: evansville, IN
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

As I understand it, mass balancing to 100% could cause more problems, bear with me.

If the control surface is neutralized by static balance then the servo which has zero torq available in the nuetral position would be throwing the load back and forth thus spiking servo motor amperages +/-. This in effect would be a micro flutter already setup.

My understanding could however be flawed since I buy into the digital servo OEM hype that it takes a movement off of center to develop servo torq, and digitals develop the torq closer to center than do the others.
Old 03-16-2005 | 02:30 PM
  #77  
David Gladwin's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,961
Received 154 Likes on 100 Posts
From: CookhamBerkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

John, My unequivocal apologies to all concerned. I fear it was more than a couple of glasses which so distorted my judgement. My wife is away with a friend, cooking for myself and well, you know, just another glass of this fine nectar ! Anyway I humbly ask forgiveness.
Regards,
David Gladwin.

Old 03-16-2005 | 02:54 PM
  #78  
mr_matt's Avatar
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Oak Park, CA,
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

ORIGINAL: c/f

As I understand it, mass balancing to 100% could cause more problems, bear with me.

If the control surface is neutralized by static balance then the servo which has zero torq available in the nuetral position would be throwing the load back and forth thus spiking servo motor amperages +/-. This in effect would be a micro flutter already setup.

My understanding could however be flawed since I buy into the digital servo OEM hype that it takes a movement off of center to develop servo torq, and digitals develop the torq closer to center than do the others.
This has been known to happen, but usually on large surfaces, like full flying stabs, as the polar moment of inertia is high.

Be aware that as we have seen higher and higher performance servos, we are seeing a SYSTEM limitation due to the fact that the gain settings in the servo cannot be adjusted. This is usually apparent on the flying stabs, I have never seen it even on heavy mass balanced elevators. We had one of the highest performance digital servos (big Volz) that was unusable on a big UAV as we could not adjust one of the gain settings in the servo controllwer software.


Old 03-16-2005 | 03:32 PM
  #79  
Miguel Santana's Avatar
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,139
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Santo Domingo, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

Matt,
You are right about that the Viper rudder has a tight taper.....
In solved that by adding some balsa blocks at the hinges holes location.....I think you called that gusset, right?
I the other Viper thead I posted another draw explaining the same problem.....I still have the idea that some of the guys are not getting the picture [] Anyway, for all of you.....here I go again [&:]
Thanks for the complements

See you.-


ORIGINAL: mr_matt

I agree, adding vertical gussets would make the exposed part of the hinge even stiffer, you can always improve!!. In my Stingray, I ended up with some pretty healthy fillets so I figured what the heck.

I have attached a couple of pics, see in the second one, I quit trying to make the clearance holes for the hinges on the movable piece, and just made the radius part in sections, so those slots in the elevator will clear the gussets.....Miguel did a great job of explaining the problem in post 58.

I agree with Tom, I would rather just cut this stuff out and do it myself...I spent more time trying to get the hinges to work on the Stinggray rudders, I think it has the same issue as the Viper, the taper was not right ....to me this will be hard to do on any ARF and is a little much to expect at the price, IMHO....you want those killer fits you almost have to do it yourself.

Having said that the only "ARF" I have seen that had predrilled, perfectly fitting hidden hinges is a Tom Cook Firebird, never seen anything close to the prefab and fit/finish on any arf.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ec87780.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	32.2 KB
ID:	244851  
Old 03-16-2005 | 11:27 PM
  #80  
c/f
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
From: evansville, IN
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

Moved to build thread
Old 03-18-2005 | 09:41 AM
  #81  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

In reply to Woketman, c/f and mr_matt

Regarding flutter:

Flutter is caused by an aero dynamical effect with a flutter frequency depending of the speed of the aircraft.

When this flutter frequency is the same (or very close) to the natural frequency of the control surface system then the flutter amplitude is amplified and the acceleration and forces in to the system will also be amplified. This is typical for a bad case of flutter.

A very rigid linkage and slope free servo transmission will contribute to a high natural frequency of the control surface system.
When you mass balance your control surface you also contribute to a high natural frequency.

Ideally you want a natural frequency of your control surfaces which are way above the aero dynamical flutter frequency at maximum flying speed.

Regarding torsional flutter of the elevators I think you can rule that out quickly by twisting an elevator half in your hand. Then compare the stiffness with the “system”. It should be quite obvious that the torsional stiffness of the elevator is significantly higher compared to the stiffness of the system.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
/Johan Tinde
Old 03-18-2005 | 09:53 AM
  #82  
mr_matt's Avatar
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Oak Park, CA,
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

ORIGINAL: Speedbird66

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
When you are right, you are right!


Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Lg16876.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	46.2 KB
ID:	245591   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ki19842.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	238.3 KB
ID:	245592  
Old 03-18-2005 | 11:45 AM
  #83  
c/f
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
From: evansville, IN
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

So, you guys are suggesting that mass balancing to 100% will move the natrual flutter freq higher which is a good thing. I'll try it as I have never done so in the past.

The VPII has servo helpers forward of C/G line on tail surfaces so it is very easy to drill a hole and insert some heli blade style round lead (YIKES, a four letter word).


Thanx for your input.........


Old 03-18-2005 | 12:51 PM
  #84  
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,437
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Slidell, LA LA
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

Certainly the stiffer the system, the better off you are and the higher the speed at which things will go a flutterin'. But I am not so sure that it can be obvious with a twist of the hand that the system is too stiff to get into a torsional flutter mode. Obviously the more torsionally stiff the surface is, the higher the flutter speed and therefore the better off you are, but its still out there somewhere. If you are gonna put weights out in the tip, I'd be real certain to put lots of carbon fiber oriented at 45 degrees in the skin.

Matt, that counterweight is TOO COOL. Was that on the Bandit's (or Stingray???) elevators or ailerons?
Old 03-18-2005 | 03:30 PM
  #85  
Miguel Santana's Avatar
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,139
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Santo Domingo, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
Default RE: ViperJet (moved from FLJ 2005 thread)

I added 2 ounces of weight to each stab in my old Viper.....and worked perfect....
I beleave more weight will be needed for this new stabs....and my concern is that the plane is already tail heavy....keep that in mind too.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.