AMT Concorde?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Crest Hill,
IL
What ever happened to it? I heard they where going to build a smaller one first to find the correct CG or something. Do they plan on flying it? Just curious. That's all.
Thanks,
Craig
Thanks,
Craig
#6
Member
My Feedback: (18)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Knoxville,
TN
Has anyone heard the status of the big AMT Concorde lately? It came up during a discussion among modelers the other night. A search yielded this thread, but I notice it is old!
#7

If AMT need the correct C of G I can fix that !
At low speeds the Cof G needs to be at 54 % of the root chord. However, once supersonic they will need to move it aft to 58% at Mach 2 and then return it progressively to 54 % during the decell.
BAC and Aerospatiale found a trim tank in the tailcone the best answer, worked perfectly , and eliminated trim drag considerably improving cruise fuel burn.
However, this will only work if the AMT Concorde wing is exactly the same shape as the original Concorde and that shape is VERY complex with twist, camber and droop , particularly the outer panels.
David Gladwin
At low speeds the Cof G needs to be at 54 % of the root chord. However, once supersonic they will need to move it aft to 58% at Mach 2 and then return it progressively to 54 % during the decell.
BAC and Aerospatiale found a trim tank in the tailcone the best answer, worked perfectly , and eliminated trim drag considerably improving cruise fuel burn.
However, this will only work if the AMT Concorde wing is exactly the same shape as the original Concorde and that shape is VERY complex with twist, camber and droop , particularly the outer panels.
David Gladwin



