Cheap turbines??
#3

My Feedback: (11)
There is one RAM 750F (22 lbs of thrust) on auction at RCCanada in the engines for sale. Currnerly the price is at 1350 Canadian dollars (about 1050 US)!
http://www.rccanada.ca/bb/viewtopic.php?t=18072
http://www.rccanada.ca/bb/viewtopic.php?t=18072
#4
Be careful buying used turbines! If you don't know the person well, even if they're honest and straight up, you could still find yourself in a lose-lose situation. $1050 sounds cheap for an engine, but not if you only get a few minutes of run time out of it before you have to send it in to an aftermarket repair facility that may charge some arbitrary price to fix an out-of-production engine. If you buy an engne (and especially if you're on a budget), get something current! Somehow, this statement seems to offend some Ram owners, but it's not meant to. It applies to any engine whose manufacturer/warrantor and service department has ceased to be. Get the seller to agree to a buyback if it's found to have issues when/if you send it in somewhere, at least.
#5

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: The Villages,
FL
I don't know the quality, and I'm still researching, but check www.jetjoe.com . Comments about the company / product are most welcome.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (17)
thats what I like about Jetcat..... I just bought another turbine, this time it was a p-120. I called and spoke with justin, gave him the serial number of that turbine and he gave me the history of that turbine before i bought it. then i shipped the money to the seller and he sent me the turbine.
before you buy a used turbine. check the work history on it.
mark
before you buy a used turbine. check the work history on it.
mark
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: leedswest yorkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
really go for the wasp. 20lb thrust small size and good on fuel . nothing comes close to this really for the price and quality
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
ORIGINAL: cowboyway88
Hey Guys, I was wanting to know where I can find a used turbine 15 to 20 lbs, and what would be a reasonable price.
Hey Guys, I was wanting to know where I can find a used turbine 15 to 20 lbs, and what would be a reasonable price.
Gordon
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Londonderry,
NH
Hi
I have a JJ1400 only 12lbs thrust, has many many flights and much more running time and runs perfect. Many people have bad things to say about jetjoe but these are people who dont own one. All of the owners of jetjoe turbines say they run very good at least I never read anything bad from a jj owner.
Tim.
I have a JJ1400 only 12lbs thrust, has many many flights and much more running time and runs perfect. Many people have bad things to say about jetjoe but these are people who dont own one. All of the owners of jetjoe turbines say they run very good at least I never read anything bad from a jj owner.
Tim.
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
ORIGINAL: timfly1
Hi
I have a JJ1400 only 12lbs thrust, has many many flights and much more running time and runs perfect.
Hi
I have a JJ1400 only 12lbs thrust, has many many flights and much more running time and runs perfect.
How many is "many, many flights" ? I recently saw someone boasting about having loads of flights on a JJ, when he had only flown it about 20 times [X(]
... to many of us, 20 flights is a weekend's flying, and nothing close to indicating reliability. Tell me about your 200+ flawless flights with a JJ, without it having to be repaired (with the exxception of FOD / crash damage), and I'll consider it reliable. BTW, the quote in your sig line, that you attribute to Chuck Yeager, is in fact generally attributed to W.W. Windstaff.
Gordon
#14
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Londonderry,
NH
You people are something else. It used to be that r/cers where helpful frendly, you people are just plain well I wont say it. The jj I have has lots of use LOTS if thats not good enough for you then I feel sorry for you. High dollar turbines have gone to your head in fact the so call anme brand turbines have there problems as well. I have never had a turbine blow up ever. Once I did see a turbine wheel come apart and then it was only because the rpms had exceeded the design limits this was a homemade wheel pieces came out the back and it was back to the drawing board no harm done. JJs are a good low dollar turbine...
And as for my sig thank you for pointing that out I will change my sig. Do you supose that Mr. Yeager could have spoke that quote hmmmm.
And as for my sig thank you for pointing that out I will change my sig. Do you supose that Mr. Yeager could have spoke that quote hmmmm.
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (11)
ORIGINAL: timfly1
You people are something else. It used to be that r/cers where helpful frendly, you people are just plain well I wont say it.
You people are something else. It used to be that r/cers where helpful frendly, you people are just plain well I wont say it.
I'd hate to see someone who is short of cash and trying to get into turbines as economically as possible scrimp by to save up the money for a turbine only to end up having something that lets him down ... and now, since he was short of cash to begin with, he's even shorter of cash for attempting to buy a replacement engine. Better that he have an idea what the reliability is like before he plonks down his hard-earned cash - and you know what - if his choice then is JJ, then power to him -- but let that be an educated choice based on the long-term viability of the engine.
Gordon
#17
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Londonderry,
NH
I dont want to step on toes or pi^s people of. You said it education. If someone wants to get into turbines no matter for what reason, that person needs to be educated in the design and use of these wonderful toys. I will say that if a person has the money to buy a good top dollar turbine then by all means do it. There are some very fine motors being manufactured. I would also say the person on a tight budget who wants to get into jets can for a very small amount of cash if you build your own turbine. I've seen ugly high wing jet trainers people have build for under $200.00 home built motor under $300.00 if you have tools not a problem. I guess I think a little different than some having built several in years past. Its safe to say that most of what comes out of China in the way of machinery is considered to be a kit by all who have purchased these things from China. By that I mean you have to take it apart clean it tweek it, then you have a nice machine most of the time. I have a lathe and mill made in China and I will tell you after cleaning, tweaking the perform as good or better than anything made here USA in fact I have made turbine parts with them and many many other precision parts. The JJs are doing better than the machines from China, but thay run and fly and I beleave there reasonalbly safe. Anyone who wants to get into jets cant be on too tight a budget or they will not get into this aspect of r/c.
So to anyone who wants to buy a cheap turbine, you will need a deep pocket or build or own turbine from scratch or parts and get educated.
Sorry for rambling.
Tim.
So to anyone who wants to buy a cheap turbine, you will need a deep pocket or build or own turbine from scratch or parts and get educated.
Sorry for rambling.
Tim.
#18
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NA,
NJ
Just some thought about the cheap turbine in question.
As far as I can tell that turbine is a blatant ripoff of the Wren MW54.
Wren is a wonderful company which has given this field some really neat innovations. It really pisses me off that some guy over in China is copying this design and reselling it. The real crux is that you can't do anything about it except not buy it.
I'm a student and a father to newborn twins. Money I don't have. Still, I'd rather save up a little more and buy Wren. Don't forget that the price does not end with the turbine alone. You still need an airplane, radio, servos etc... All in all you might save $500 in a $5000 airplane. Resonably safe? Your call.
Just my two cents
p.s. Buying the other turbine you also forgo the Wren service which is about the best there is.
As far as I can tell that turbine is a blatant ripoff of the Wren MW54.
Wren is a wonderful company which has given this field some really neat innovations. It really pisses me off that some guy over in China is copying this design and reselling it. The real crux is that you can't do anything about it except not buy it.
I'm a student and a father to newborn twins. Money I don't have. Still, I'd rather save up a little more and buy Wren. Don't forget that the price does not end with the turbine alone. You still need an airplane, radio, servos etc... All in all you might save $500 in a $5000 airplane. Resonably safe? Your call.
Just my two cents
p.s. Buying the other turbine you also forgo the Wren service which is about the best there is.
#19
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Londonderry,
NH
The JJ 1200 is a copy for sure, the 1400 maybe. But then all turbines except for the Phoenix are copies to some degree. And yes Wren and others have done some research to design a better running turbine its more a matter of tweaking than inovative design. There have been companies are still are who buy parts from Wren and sell the turbines. Hmm are these copies too?
#20
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: leedswest yorkshire, UNITED KINGDOM
i would tell you about a jet joe blowing up but all witness`s are dead. not really its just what i have heard all i have seen is a jetjoe running ok but with lots of vibration meaning life will be short. i only have experiance flying with a few types and i can very much recommend behotec and wren engines seem to be good apart from slight problems with ecu failures. as i said also the heward wasp is a good buy
#21
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bowling Green, KY
Im not sturing anything up but good greif the JJ Turbine wheel is not designed the same as the Wren.... Everyone says the JJ was copied for a Mk2 kit....3 weeks ago a goof friend of mine brought a Mk2 to the field and we sit them side be side and the was a clear difference in the pitch of the jj compared to the wren, although we did not count them, it seemed the jj had a few more blades aswell.
#22
Banned
My Feedback: (119)
ORIGINAL: Heatseeker_Hill
i would tell you about a jet joe blowing up but all witness`s are dead. not really its just what i have heard all i have seen is a jetjoe running ok but with lots of vibration meaning life will be short. i only have experiance flying with a few types and i can very much recommend behotec and wren engines seem to be good apart from slight problems with ecu failures. as i said also the heward wasp is a good buy
i would tell you about a jet joe blowing up but all witness`s are dead. not really its just what i have heard all i have seen is a jetjoe running ok but with lots of vibration meaning life will be short. i only have experiance flying with a few types and i can very much recommend behotec and wren engines seem to be good apart from slight problems with ecu failures. as i said also the heward wasp is a good buy
So...that was a lie?
#23
Wasn't that long before it turned nasty
Lasted quite well really before someon mentioned JJ.

Let's look at it another way.
Define cheap. Give it a budget. Then examine what is available at that price, look at new and used.
If it's new, check the supply chain, whats the presumed reliability, what is being said, is that view presented by someone qualified to present it, what's the evidence about it.
If it's second user or more, what are the parts status, run time, condition, evidence of others, access to the manufacturer and local availability of expertise etc etc. Indeed many of the checks for new would be as valid as the checks for cheap.
Do your homework, as if your looking for it to be cheap, it will be lower costs for reasons, make sure you understand and can qualify such reasons.
But make sure your budget has some reserve whether you buy new or 2nd user.
At the end of hte day pay your money and take your choice.
Like I say define cheap, and it is not a word oft associated with jets.............
Gazzer
Was that OK ET?
Lasted quite well really before someon mentioned JJ.

Let's look at it another way.
Define cheap. Give it a budget. Then examine what is available at that price, look at new and used.
If it's new, check the supply chain, whats the presumed reliability, what is being said, is that view presented by someone qualified to present it, what's the evidence about it.
If it's second user or more, what are the parts status, run time, condition, evidence of others, access to the manufacturer and local availability of expertise etc etc. Indeed many of the checks for new would be as valid as the checks for cheap.
Do your homework, as if your looking for it to be cheap, it will be lower costs for reasons, make sure you understand and can qualify such reasons.
But make sure your budget has some reserve whether you buy new or 2nd user.
At the end of hte day pay your money and take your choice.
Like I say define cheap, and it is not a word oft associated with jets.............
Gazzer
Was that OK ET?
#24
Banned
My Feedback: (119)
ORIGINAL: Gazzer
Wasn't that long before it turned nasty
Lasted quite well really before someon mentioned JJ.

Let's look at it another way.
Define cheap. Give it a budget. Then examine what is available at that price, look at new and used.
If it's new, check the supply chain, whats the presumed reliability, what is being said, is that view presented by someone qualified to present it, what's the evidence about it.
If it's second user or more, what are the parts status, run time, condition, evidence of others, access to the manufacturer and local availability of expertise etc etc. Indeed many of the checks for new would be as valid as the checks for cheap.
Do your homework, as if your looking for it to be cheap, it will be lower costs for reasons, make sure you understand and can qualify such reasons.
But make sure your budget has some reserve whether you buy new or 2nd user.
At the end of hte day pay your money and take your choice.
Like I say define cheap, and it is not a word oft associated with jets.............
Gazzer
Was that OK ET?
Wasn't that long before it turned nasty
Lasted quite well really before someon mentioned JJ.

Let's look at it another way.
Define cheap. Give it a budget. Then examine what is available at that price, look at new and used.
If it's new, check the supply chain, whats the presumed reliability, what is being said, is that view presented by someone qualified to present it, what's the evidence about it.
If it's second user or more, what are the parts status, run time, condition, evidence of others, access to the manufacturer and local availability of expertise etc etc. Indeed many of the checks for new would be as valid as the checks for cheap.
Do your homework, as if your looking for it to be cheap, it will be lower costs for reasons, make sure you understand and can qualify such reasons.
But make sure your budget has some reserve whether you buy new or 2nd user.
At the end of hte day pay your money and take your choice.
Like I say define cheap, and it is not a word oft associated with jets.............
Gazzer
Was that OK ET?
The problem is it is very difficult to get accurate info on the Jetjoe because people keep making up lies about it.
That makes it very hard to make the informed decision you are suggesting.
I mean, people talking about them exploding? Saying lots of them are exploding? Then it turns out to be a complete lie.
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Londonderry,
NH
Wren is the one saying that JJ copied there MW54 MK2 maybe he did, Wren only publishes the drawings for the MK2 I have a set of the MK2 drawings but I dont have a JJ1200. I dont think it would be useful to compair the 1400 with Wrens drawings. I would say that the JJ motors at least the 1200 and 1400 are more for the home builder type. The person who has tools and can tweak turbines. Much of this uncerteny I'm sure comes from JJ who ever he is not coming forth and speaking out for his motors. JET JOE SPEAK OUT. Maybe low cost is better than saying cheap. The JJs are low cost but not cheap. The parts are well manufactured tolerances seem to be good, at $700.00 a motor thats not cheap.


