Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 Twitches >

Twitches

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Twitches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2006 | 09:01 AM
  #26  
causeitflies's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,452
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
From: EASTERN OHIO
Default RE: Twitches

Frothingslosh,
Did you point the antenna directly at the plane and turn the plane at different angles?
Old 09-19-2006 | 09:55 AM
  #27  
Member
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Royston, GA
Default RE: Twitches

I have had the same experience with the Deans base loaded whip antennae! My ground range was actually more with it than with the regular antennae! 487' ! It was about 5' less with the ECU and turbine on!!
Old 09-19-2006 | 09:56 AM
  #28  
frothingslosh's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Willard, OH
Default RE: Twitches

Mark -

We did everything but stand on our heads trying to get a lockout - not a twitch. The Deans was mounted vertically on the nose of the plane so it was more or less omni-directional from the getgo. I'd heard of guys getting over 600 ft. with this kind of setup but didn't belive it. I'm a believer now. I also know guys that swear they get more range with the Deans than with the wire antenna. Have a friend with a Boomer XL - has all but about 2" of the Deans INSIDE the nose (mounted vertically) and it works like a charm.
Old 09-19-2006 | 01:03 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: BrisbaneQLD, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Twitches

I get that no problem with a Multiplex transmitter and IPD receiver!
Old 09-19-2006 | 02:31 PM
  #30  
GrayUK's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Dunstable, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Twitches

ORIGINAL: j.duncker

What about lockouts then. You were at St Athens and a number of pilots reported lockouts.

I have flown both PCM and PPM in high threat environments. Personally I am more comfortable getting warning glitches which may alert me to the weakening link. But I am always happy to listen to my peers on subjects like this. I understand the theory behind PCM, is there any concrete evidence that says it will be safer in the air?
I was present when both 'lock outs occurred' What i can tell you is that if that had been ppm both models would have gone home in black bags.
The fault turned out to the the TX but due to the pcm hold last commands the models continue the turns adn came back into signal range, both were then landed.
As the model were flying in a banking curve away form the TX at medium height, the resultant glitch's would have most likely put the model into the ground (or a hanger!).

This thread is not really the place to debate this subject, if you wish, i will give you a unarguable ground demonstration as to why you should fly PCM next time we meet

Stig
You my old mate, how goes it?

Paul

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.