Composite ARF Tucano Build
#203
My Feedback: (27)
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
The stock CG location leaves the plane tail heavy. The plane flies fine, but just sort of "plows through the air" tail low. Moving the CG forward with 12 ounces of weight makes a world of difference in how the Tucano flies. You will notice a speed increase, better vertical performance and it is much more stable in pitch.
Beave
Beave
ORIGINAL: P38J
Hi Jan, I used the throws and CG location from the instructions and I had no problems the plane handled fine and had no bad habits.
Hi Jan, I used the throws and CG location from the instructions and I had no problems the plane handled fine and had no bad habits.
#204
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
ORIGINAL: bevar
The stock CG location leaves the plane tail heavy. The plane flies fine, but just sort of ''plows through the air'' tail low. Moving the CG forward with 12 ounces of weight makes a world of difference in how the Tucano flies. You will notice a speed increase, better vertical performance and it is much more stable in pitch.
Beave
The stock CG location leaves the plane tail heavy. The plane flies fine, but just sort of ''plows through the air'' tail low. Moving the CG forward with 12 ounces of weight makes a world of difference in how the Tucano flies. You will notice a speed increase, better vertical performance and it is much more stable in pitch.
Beave
ORIGINAL: P38J
Hi Jan, I used the throws and CG location from the instructions and I had no problems the plane handled fine and had no bad habits.
Hi Jan, I used the throws and CG location from the instructions and I had no problems the plane handled fine and had no bad habits.
I think it flies better slightly forward. Weight added will vary, but its a little too neutral at the manual figure for me. Some on this forum would certainly feel happy though.
Dw
#205
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,469
Received 26 Likes
on
24 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
ORIGINAL: Dave Wilshere
+1
I think it flies better slightly forward. Weight added will vary, but its a little too neutral at the manual figure for me. Some on this forum would certainly feel happy though.
Dw
ORIGINAL: bevar
The stock CG location leaves the plane tail heavy. The plane flies fine, but just sort of ''plows through the air'' tail low. Moving the CG forward with 12 ounces of weight makes a world of difference in how the Tucano flies. You will notice a speed increase, better vertical performance and it is much more stable in pitch.
Beave
The stock CG location leaves the plane tail heavy. The plane flies fine, but just sort of ''plows through the air'' tail low. Moving the CG forward with 12 ounces of weight makes a world of difference in how the Tucano flies. You will notice a speed increase, better vertical performance and it is much more stable in pitch.
Beave
ORIGINAL: P38J
Hi Jan, I used the throws and CG location from the instructions and I had no problems the plane handled fine and had no bad habits.
Hi Jan, I used the throws and CG location from the instructions and I had no problems the plane handled fine and had no bad habits.
I think it flies better slightly forward. Weight added will vary, but its a little too neutral at the manual figure for me. Some on this forum would certainly feel happy though.
Dw
Thank you all,
Is it at all possible for any of you guys flying the Tucano with the 12oz's added to let me know where the cg now is. It will be very helpful if you could give me a position at the wing root measured from the leading edge as I always balance next to the fuselage, rather than at the wing tips.
Finally, what size smoke tank are you guys using (while the standard tanks are used as intended) and where have you installed it?
Cheers,
Jan
#208
My Feedback: (27)
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
Dave,
You made an excellent point. Different people like their planes to "feel" different to them. Some guys like tail heavy, some guys like nose heavy, some guys fly fingertip with monster deflection angles and some guys fly thumbs with small throws. To each his own I suppose.
That being said, for the Tucano to fly at it's optimum...it needs to have the C of G forward of the factory recommendation as mentioned in other posts. Sure, it flies OK at the stock setting and there are no doubt some who like it there, but it flies "much better" forward of the mark IMO.
Beave
You made an excellent point. Different people like their planes to "feel" different to them. Some guys like tail heavy, some guys like nose heavy, some guys fly fingertip with monster deflection angles and some guys fly thumbs with small throws. To each his own I suppose.
That being said, for the Tucano to fly at it's optimum...it needs to have the C of G forward of the factory recommendation as mentioned in other posts. Sure, it flies OK at the stock setting and there are no doubt some who like it there, but it flies "much better" forward of the mark IMO.
Beave
ORIGINAL: Dave Wilshere
+1
I think it flies better slightly forward. Weight added will vary, but its a little too neutral at the manual figure for me. Some on this forum would certainly feel happy though.
Dw
+1
I think it flies better slightly forward. Weight added will vary, but its a little too neutral at the manual figure for me. Some on this forum would certainly feel happy though.
Dw
#209
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sorocaba, , BRAZIL
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
ORIGINAL: bevar
The stock CG location leaves the plane tail heavy. The plane flies fine, but just sort of ''plows through the air'' tail low. Moving the CG forward with 12 ounces of weight makes a world of difference in how the Tucano flies. You will notice a speed increase, better vertical performance and it is much more stable in pitch.
Beave
The stock CG location leaves the plane tail heavy. The plane flies fine, but just sort of ''plows through the air'' tail low. Moving the CG forward with 12 ounces of weight makes a world of difference in how the Tucano flies. You will notice a speed increase, better vertical performance and it is much more stable in pitch.
Beave
ORIGINAL: P38J
Hi Jan, I used the throws and CG location from the instructions and I had no problems the plane handled fine and had no bad habits.
Hi Jan, I used the throws and CG location from the instructions and I had no problems the plane handled fine and had no bad habits.
What is the weight on the nose (scale leveled with the main weels) after you had the plane on a great CG? I find that to be the best way to get a correct CG. I will start on mine this week!
Best,
Leo
#210
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
ORIGINAL: Modellbau Brazil
What is the weight on the nose (scale leveled with the main weels) after you had the plane on a great CG? I find that to be the best way to get a correct CG.
What is the weight on the nose (scale leveled with the main weels) after you had the plane on a great CG? I find that to be the best way to get a correct CG.
this is a VERY poor way to balance a model. with so many having such a big difference in their dry AUW this method of CG can be off quiet a bit.
#211
My Feedback: (27)
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
Leo,
Mine weighs 4 pounds 8 ounces on the nose wheel.
KC brings up an excellent point in his post, so keep it in mind. The weight will only be a good reference if your dry weight equals mine, which is 42 pounds. Depending on how you build your Tucano, your weight might might be quite different from mine. I know of some other Tucanos that weigh well over 50 pounds dry, and in that case, my numbers would be useless.
Build your plane as light as possible, because no matter what power plant you choose (but of course I recommend you use the new Jet Cat V3 Turbo Prop motor), you are still ending up with a 100CC sized airplane that weighs over 50 pounds at takeoff power to weight wise.
Let us know how it goes and have fun!
Beave
http://www.f18superhornet.com/Tucano.htm
Mine weighs 4 pounds 8 ounces on the nose wheel.
KC brings up an excellent point in his post, so keep it in mind. The weight will only be a good reference if your dry weight equals mine, which is 42 pounds. Depending on how you build your Tucano, your weight might might be quite different from mine. I know of some other Tucanos that weigh well over 50 pounds dry, and in that case, my numbers would be useless.
Build your plane as light as possible, because no matter what power plant you choose (but of course I recommend you use the new Jet Cat V3 Turbo Prop motor), you are still ending up with a 100CC sized airplane that weighs over 50 pounds at takeoff power to weight wise.
Let us know how it goes and have fun!
Beave
http://www.f18superhornet.com/Tucano.htm
ORIGINAL: Modellbau Brazil
Beave,
What is the weight on the nose (scale leveled with the main weels) after you had the plane on a great CG? I find that to be the best way to get a correct CG. I will start on mine this week!
Best,
Leo
Beave,
What is the weight on the nose (scale leveled with the main weels) after you had the plane on a great CG? I find that to be the best way to get a correct CG. I will start on mine this week!
Best,
Leo
#212
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
Nose gear door actuators.Plz advise what size and brand you used? I want to get rid of unreliable spring.
Thanks,
Maurice Hanjoul.
#214
My Feedback: (27)
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
Concur. Don't try the factory method...use door cylinders. I used BVM on the Tucano (OK...Bill Hatcher installed 'em) and my Lightning used Robart. Just pick a good quality unit (UP, BVM, Robart) and you will be fine.
Beave
Beave
ORIGINAL: P38J
I'm not sure which brand I used they were a set I had laying around in the shop; they were one inch throw I believe. I would recommend Ultra Precision cylinders. There are many other brands but they seem to hold up well over time.
I'm not sure which brand I used they were a set I had laying around in the shop; they were one inch throw I believe. I would recommend Ultra Precision cylinders. There are many other brands but they seem to hold up well over time.
#216
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sorocaba, , BRAZIL
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
ORIGINAL: martin_wam
My CG is set at the wing retaining bolt, and that is spot on.
A few pictures of my cockpit and pilots made by Maff's CAV.
My CG is set at the wing retaining bolt, and that is spot on.
A few pictures of my cockpit and pilots made by Maff's CAV.
Hi Martin,
How did you get in touch with this guy? I have emailed him several times with no luck.
Thanks, your cockpit looks just like the real one.
#218
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: RobinaQLD, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
Peter Agnew has let me know my SPT-5 has been shipped, and my Tucano kit is ready to be shipped in the next container to Australia.
The long(ish) wait is nearing it's end!!
The long(ish) wait is nearing it's end!!
#219
My Feedback: (27)
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
That is a winning combination Mate...you are just going to love it!
Beave
Beave
ORIGINAL: mincherallen
Peter Agnew has let me know my SPT-5 has been shipped, and my Tucano kit is ready to be shipped in the next container to Australia.
The long(ish) wait is nearing it's end!!
Peter Agnew has let me know my SPT-5 has been shipped, and my Tucano kit is ready to be shipped in the next container to Australia.
The long(ish) wait is nearing it's end!!
#221
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Slagelse, DENMARK
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
Jan, I balanced my Tucano at the wing retaining bolt position, and with the batteries mounted as far forward as possible I ended up with app. 100 G of weight in the nose.
My smoke tank is a standard Tucano fuel tank placed below the aft fuel tank - see attached pictures.
Regarding the cockpit, just write Matthias again - he will answer you. He made my cockpit and pilots. The helmets were painted by a friend of mine.
Having said that, I know that Matthias doesn't really want to make cockpits anymore, so he might decline your order.
You can also trywww.noll-modelltechnik.de - they do make instrument panels for the Tucano.
Also have a look atwww.inzpan.com - they make great cockpits.
Best regards,
Martin
My smoke tank is a standard Tucano fuel tank placed below the aft fuel tank - see attached pictures.
Regarding the cockpit, just write Matthias again - he will answer you. He made my cockpit and pilots. The helmets were painted by a friend of mine.
Having said that, I know that Matthias doesn't really want to make cockpits anymore, so he might decline your order.
You can also trywww.noll-modelltechnik.de - they do make instrument panels for the Tucano.
Also have a look atwww.inzpan.com - they make great cockpits.
Best regards,
Martin
#223
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,469
Received 26 Likes
on
24 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
Beave, Interesting, why do you use a UAT on the smoke side? Must say I like the servo output horns that you have on the rudder - please can you tell me where to find them? Cheers, Jan.
#224
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
Jan, The servo arms on Bevar,s Tucano came from Air Wild.
Here is the link to them.
http://www.airwildpilotshop.com/More...product&id=292
Hope this helps.
Here is the link to them.
http://www.airwildpilotshop.com/More...product&id=292
Hope this helps.
#225
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,469
Received 26 Likes
on
24 Posts
RE: Composite ARF Tucano Build
ORIGINAL: Bill Hatcher
Jan, The servo arms on Bevar,s Tucano came from Air Wild.
Here is the link to them.
http://www.airwildpilotshop.com/More...product&id=292
Hope this helps.
Jan, The servo arms on Bevar,s Tucano came from Air Wild.
Here is the link to them.
http://www.airwildpilotshop.com/More...product&id=292
Hope this helps.
Bill,
Awesome mate, thanks a mil.
Cheers,
Jan