Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust >

Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2008 | 06:06 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Enterprise, AL
Default Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

a little TiVo on the GE90 115B

[link=http://www.fileden.com/files/2006/9/12/215757/GE90115B.wmv]Click To Play[/link]


the hail test is [X(]
Old 04-18-2008 | 06:21 PM
  #2  
SPEED JUNKIE's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (14)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: GRIFTON, NC
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Why does that sexy new blade draw in more air then a conventional straight chord blade?
More area reaching out beyond the norm of the conventional blade?
Old 04-18-2008 | 06:22 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Enterprise, AL
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

i dunno, but if we could get a few of them put on a JetCat................
Old 04-18-2008 | 06:25 PM
  #4  
Joe C's Avatar
My Feedback: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,455
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
From: CA
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

great engine, thanks for sharing. Joe C!!
Old 04-18-2008 | 09:31 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlotte, NC
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

I wish I could watch it, but God forbid my computer actually work.[:'(]

@Speed Junkie, I just did some research, and read that the fan blades are specially designed to operate at low rpm ( around 2500 rpm ) so it moves the same ammount of air as a conventional blade running at a higher speed. This lower speed allows it to meet all noise requirements.
Old 04-18-2008 | 10:42 PM
  #6  
WhoDaMan's Avatar
My Feedback: (164)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Davis, CA
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

That is incredable
Old 04-18-2008 | 10:56 PM
  #7  
Wayne22's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,394
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Strathcona county, AB, CANADA
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Just by contrast...in 1968 - 40 years ago- the first JT9D, the biggest jet engine in the world at the time (designed for the B747) flew its first test flight and developed a whopping 43,500 lbs of thrust
Old 04-19-2008 | 01:39 AM
  #8  
My Feedback: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,096
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chevrieres, FRANCE
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Impressive engine, I guess they can fly the 747 as a twin now!
Old 04-19-2008 | 08:04 AM
  #9  
My Feedback: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, MO
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Sara,
Do you have a FOD screen that will fit this?
Thanks,
Don
Old 04-19-2008 | 03:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

I flew on a 777 and it vibrated like no other jet I have been on..

They need to put 3 of those monsters on the back of flying wing
with 1000 head of cattle on board... hahaha

Eddie
Old 04-19-2008 | 03:53 PM
  #11  
My Feedback: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Springfield, MO
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Eddie,
They probably forgot to "Locktite" the bolts that hold the turbine to the plane! [X(]
Don
Old 04-20-2008 | 07:24 AM
  #12  
747drvr's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: DundasOntario, CANADA
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Thanks for the cool vid . I can attest to the awsome power these engines can produce ! My new ride is the 777-300/ER and 200LR . Amazing machines !

Marc
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ge96340.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	44.5 KB
ID:	933064  
Old 04-20-2008 | 08:27 AM
  #13  
TREADSTONE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust



....127,900 Lbs ?.. The GE90-115B Max Power at Sea Level is rated @ 115,300 Lb.......Or does it have a reheat version...
Old 04-20-2008 | 08:48 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Enterprise, AL
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

ORIGINAL: TREADSTONE



....127,900 Lbs ?.. The GE90-115B Max Power at Sea Level is rated @ 115,300 Lb.......Or does it have a reheat version...

can only go by what the lady said as being 'Most Recently'.
Old 04-20-2008 | 11:14 AM
  #15  
darryltarr's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

115,300 Lbs of thrust at Sea Level is the Flat Rating, hence GE115BL (the 115 stands for the Flat Rating Thrust Available), however with a plug change to the Fuel Control Unit the engine can produce more thrust.

At a Sea Level Airport with standard pressure (1013.25 Millibars) the engine will produce 115,300 Lbs of thrust until the ambient temperature exceeds about 28 degrees celcius, meaning that below this temperature the engine is Flat Rated.

It's always better to reduce the thrust on all jet engines as much as possible (of course maximum thrust is always available in an emergency), but we very seldome do full rated thrust takeoffs. How we do this is to input an assumed ambient temperature into the FMC (sometimes as much as 75 degrees celcius), the engine now thinks that the actual ambient temperature is 75 so it limits the thrust.

Don't want to be too technical, more of a laymens answer.

Cheers,

Darryl Tarr,
Captain Boeing 777,
Emirates airline
Old 04-20-2008 | 11:30 AM
  #16  
WhoDaMan's Avatar
My Feedback: (164)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Davis, CA
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Thanks you Darryl,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, very well explained for the layman

Dave
Old 04-20-2008 | 11:35 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust


ORIGINAL: darryltarr

Darryl Tarr,
Captain Boeing 777,
Emirates airline
So… With your experience, do those engines vibrate a little more than most jets…

Or was I on just on too much crack that day… ?

Eddie

Old 04-20-2008 | 11:37 AM
  #18  
WhoDaMan's Avatar
My Feedback: (164)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Davis, CA
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust


[quote]ORIGINAL: EddieWeeks


ORIGINAL: darryltarr

Darryl Tarr,
Captain Boeing 777,
Emirates airline
So… With your experience, do those engines vibrate a little more than most jets…

Or was I on just on too much crack that day… ?

Eddie


Crack Kills
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Fc90255.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	59.3 KB
ID:	933193  
Old 04-20-2008 | 11:06 PM
  #19  
darryltarr's Avatar
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

Hello Eddie,

They growl and rumble a lot during the start procedure, but after stabilization they are as smooth as silk throughout the flight envelope.

I think this airplane has a very bad crack in one of its windows.

Cheers


Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Tr51192.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	132.2 KB
ID:	933752  
Old 04-21-2008 | 12:42 AM
  #20  
Eddie P's Avatar
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Reno, NV
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust

ORIGINAL: Wayne22

Just by contrast...in 1968 - 40 years ago- the first JT9D, the biggest jet engine in the world at the time (designed for the B747) flew its first test flight and developed a whopping 43,500 lbs of thrust
And the current -400 versions of the 747, a-la 1989 vintage with the big upper deck and winglets, have over 60,000 pounds of thrust these days per engine, and the 747-8 due out next year will have well over 70k per engine, in the basic same size package for a total of about 290,000 pounds of thrust for the airplane.

And the A-380 with four of the 'baby' 777 engines on it, pretty amazing.

The 777 variant engines are pretty cool looking, but the big -300ER versions are just monsters. Wise cracks about 2 engines going on strike during short final not withstanding.

Engine technilogy has long been the bottleneck of aerspace development, it's pretty cool to see the development these days, bit by bit.
Old 04-21-2008 | 01:06 AM
  #21  
TREADSTONE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: , UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Only 127,900 LBS Of Thrust


ORIGINAL: Eddie P
...Engine technilogy has long been the bottleneck of aerspace development.

Its not the engines that are holding the 787 back...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.