Flyeagle F18F
#527
My Feedback: (24)
RE: Flyeagle F18F
ORIGINAL: Mr DJ
To anyone reading this: is this customer service or what? FEJ is on the One!
To anyone reading this: is this customer service or what? FEJ is on the One!
As for the "fix" its not conclusive that bigger cylinders will solve the problem. Whatever the fix, FEJ needs to come up with potential solutions and then FLY it and try it, and do so enough that the fix is going to work for the customers without further aggravation and risk to their investment. Instead, I fear that they will simply move on and leave the customers to find their own solutions to the problems, as they have done in their previous models.
Bob
#528
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: norwich, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Hi All i have flown mine today and i have had the same problem as david with the gear retracting it will not go up,i also think that the main gear needs to be brought forward as far as possable because mine came off the ground at 80 degrees a hand full of down elevator saved the model,once up and flying not to bad but the C/G needs to be more forward it was very pitch sencertive,i rolled to inverted to prove the c/g problem and needed only very slight down elevator which indeicated rearward c/g problem,when inverted i had a flame out!! and had to land dead stick this broke the main gear mounts on one side,very easy to repair and needed doing any way no other damage,but i agree with david it needs at least 40lbs plus as there is a lot of drag on the air frame,the Rhino only just enough to fly it,verticals woud not be good regards Keith
1st vertical on take off 2 flying shot
1st vertical on take off 2 flying shot
#529
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Maryland,
MD
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
ORIGINAL: jetmodeller
Hi All i have flown mine today and i have had the same problem as david with the gear retracting it will not go up,i also think that the main gear needs to be brought forward as far as possable because mine came off the ground at 80 degrees a hand full of down elevator saved the model,once up and flying not to bad but the C/G needs to be more forward it was very pitch sencertive,i rolled to inverted to prove the c/g problem and needed only very slight down elevator which indeicated rearward c/g problem,when inverted i had a flame out!! and had to land dead stick this broke the main gear mounts on one side,very easy to repair and needed doing any way no other damage,but i agree with david it needs at least 40lbs plus as there is a lot of drag on the air frame,the Rhino only just enough to fly it,verticals woud not be good regards Keith
Hi All i have flown mine today and i have had the same problem as david with the gear retracting it will not go up,i also think that the main gear needs to be brought forward as far as possable because mine came off the ground at 80 degrees a hand full of down elevator saved the model,once up and flying not to bad but the C/G needs to be more forward it was very pitch sencertive,i rolled to inverted to prove the c/g problem and needed only very slight down elevator which indeicated rearward c/g problem,when inverted i had a flame out!! and had to land dead stick this broke the main gear mounts on one side,very easy to repair and needed doing any way no other damage,but i agree with david it needs at least 40lbs plus as there is a lot of drag on the air frame,the Rhino only just enough to fly it,verticals woud not be good regards Keith
Sorry to hear 'bout your broken gear mount but like you said, easy fix... Post a photo if you can...
You have the light version-correct? Even with that version, 40 or more pounds is suggested from you-excellent info: c/g, power, all... I know you and David S are excellent flyers-your comments are well taken...
Thanks...
#530
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mtarfa., MALTA
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Keith,
Have you flown it with full ordinance? I have the heavy version. If flown without ordinance using 40lbs you think it will be `good' enough for flying?
Regards
Joseph
Have you flown it with full ordinance? I have the heavy version. If flown without ordinance using 40lbs you think it will be `good' enough for flying?
Regards
Joseph
#531
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: norwich, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Hi i only had the missles on the wing tips and the others underneath no tanks,40lbs will fly it but the vertcals will not be great regards Keith
#532
Senior Member
My Feedback: (36)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Hello Keith and All,
Some one posted that on any F18F a shim should be placed under front nose gear to lift the nose up slightly thus allowing better AOA on take off. I cut 1/4 ply shims and placed them between gear mounts and ply rails. Easy fix and lift the nose up 1/4 inch. Nose gear fits inside fuse with no problem.
Also it has been stated that take off flaps should always be used for F18F. Did you use take off flaps, and if so what did you have them set at. Also what did you set your CG at and what are you going to move it to.
I think there are a handful of us getting ready to maiden our FEJ F18F, and all this info is needed.
What else would you do to enhance flight and handling charactoristics?? Was your nose wheel responsive using FEJ pull/ pull wire system??
Thanks to everyone contributing to this thread.
Kevin Marks
Some one posted that on any F18F a shim should be placed under front nose gear to lift the nose up slightly thus allowing better AOA on take off. I cut 1/4 ply shims and placed them between gear mounts and ply rails. Easy fix and lift the nose up 1/4 inch. Nose gear fits inside fuse with no problem.
Also it has been stated that take off flaps should always be used for F18F. Did you use take off flaps, and if so what did you have them set at. Also what did you set your CG at and what are you going to move it to.
I think there are a handful of us getting ready to maiden our FEJ F18F, and all this info is needed.
What else would you do to enhance flight and handling charactoristics?? Was your nose wheel responsive using FEJ pull/ pull wire system??
Thanks to everyone contributing to this thread.
Kevin Marks
#533
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: , FRANCE
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Hello,
Dave and Keith, do you have balance the elevator?
Concerning the power for this plane, it's an obviousness that 40 lbs or more is better than 36 lbs... but don't forget that all the planes that flight until today, flight with gear down (because the gear problem) and with this, the drap is enormous..
So yes this plane is probably better with big engine, but i think that a 36 lbs to 40 lbs engine is correct and more realist, but less demonstrative (vertical..etc)
I have several model:
Rafale xtreme jet (10.5 kg dry) with 13 kg of trust, Or FEJ F16 (9.5 kg dry) with only 7.5 kg of trust.. it's different.. but all flight great, it's different style.
Concernig the several little issues (gear up, gear plate..etc) regarding the low price of these models, the excellent after sell service (thanks a lot James!!).. i think it's question of choice. i made already several modifications and checks to improve the reliability (before first flight in several week...i'm not in e hurry!) (tank renforcement, gear plate replacement, )..etc
It's also abviousness that skymaster ARF plus or composite aRF make CURRENTLY.... better plane but.. the price.. and with the rate of progression of FEJ.... it's excellent :
Regards,
sébastien
Dave and Keith, do you have balance the elevator?
Concerning the power for this plane, it's an obviousness that 40 lbs or more is better than 36 lbs... but don't forget that all the planes that flight until today, flight with gear down (because the gear problem) and with this, the drap is enormous..
So yes this plane is probably better with big engine, but i think that a 36 lbs to 40 lbs engine is correct and more realist, but less demonstrative (vertical..etc)
I have several model:
Rafale xtreme jet (10.5 kg dry) with 13 kg of trust, Or FEJ F16 (9.5 kg dry) with only 7.5 kg of trust.. it's different.. but all flight great, it's different style.
Concernig the several little issues (gear up, gear plate..etc) regarding the low price of these models, the excellent after sell service (thanks a lot James!!).. i think it's question of choice. i made already several modifications and checks to improve the reliability (before first flight in several week...i'm not in e hurry!) (tank renforcement, gear plate replacement, )..etc
It's also abviousness that skymaster ARF plus or composite aRF make CURRENTLY.... better plane but.. the price.. and with the rate of progression of FEJ.... it's excellent :
Regards,
sébastien
#534
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: norwich, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Hi Seb no i did not use take off flap as i was not sure if it would affect the elevator trim,also i did not balance the elevators as to put around 2oz in each elevator would need the same if not more weight in the front to get the c/g correct,C.G was set at 160mm from the L/edge of wing this needs to be futher forward,perhaps David can tell us where his is set regards Keith
#535
My Feedback: (24)
RE: Flyeagle F18F
ORIGINAL: Kmarks
Also it has been stated that take off flaps should always be used for F18F. Did you use take off flaps, and if so what did you have them set at. Also what did you set your CG at and what are you going to move it to.
Also it has been stated that take off flaps should always be used for F18F. Did you use take off flaps, and if so what did you have them set at. Also what did you set your CG at and what are you going to move it to.
Bob
#536
My Feedback: (49)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SANTA ANA, CA
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Keith,
I'm sorry to hear about your damage, but glad it is repairable.
I balanced mine exactly on the point they indicated, with the fuel tanks empty and gear down. I then added a 1lb weight in the nose, just to be sure. With the added weight of the fuel in the center tank, mine actually felt a little nose heavy. I'm just super careful in making sure I never do another maiden flight with a tail heavy airplane! Takes years off your life! Again, I'm really glad you got yours down in one piece, especially deadstick!!
Bob,
I agree with your comments re the new cylinders. I'm not sure the cylinders are the problem. In static they snap up with what seems to be more than enough authority to handle the air induced drag. The problem seems to me to be in the ultra secure mechanical down lock built into the gear frames. A good positive down lock is essential, but there's seems to bind the system under load. We'll see how the larger cylinders work.
While I also agree with your comments about testing first, I also accept the fact that I paid less than $3k for this plane delivered to my door! I'm sure that a more involved testing cycle would alleviate some customer issues ahead of time, but how much would it also increase the cost? For the time being, I'm still happy making the effort to help work out some of the bugs in exchange for saving a bunch of money! Were the issues more structural in nature, ie weak wings or construction, it would be a different story! But overall, for the money, I still think I'm ahead in the game. Especially if the cylinders solve the problem, this plane is golden.
As regards takeoff settings. I learned by flying the Tam SuperHornet, to use FULL flaps, hold full up elevator until you see the nose start to lighten, then ease back on the elevator for smooth takeoffs. The same process worked on this F-18F. The problem is that the AOA on our planes tends to be slightly negative. It causes the nose to be difficult to "unstick" that's why the "jump" on takeoff. I would say that Keith's 80 degree takeoff was entirely due to his having no flap set.
GAWD, I hadn't seen the photo before. Thrust is a wonderful thing! It can save you from all sorts of unfortunate predicaments we get ourselves into. That had to be a TRUE 36lbs spitting out the tail or you would have been done!
Yes, my stabs are balanced and yes it took a couple oz in each to get it done. I know there is an argument back and forth as to whether it is really necessary. But IMHO, I would never fly a plane of this size with stabs this big, having not balanced them.
David S
I'm sorry to hear about your damage, but glad it is repairable.
I balanced mine exactly on the point they indicated, with the fuel tanks empty and gear down. I then added a 1lb weight in the nose, just to be sure. With the added weight of the fuel in the center tank, mine actually felt a little nose heavy. I'm just super careful in making sure I never do another maiden flight with a tail heavy airplane! Takes years off your life! Again, I'm really glad you got yours down in one piece, especially deadstick!!
Bob,
I agree with your comments re the new cylinders. I'm not sure the cylinders are the problem. In static they snap up with what seems to be more than enough authority to handle the air induced drag. The problem seems to me to be in the ultra secure mechanical down lock built into the gear frames. A good positive down lock is essential, but there's seems to bind the system under load. We'll see how the larger cylinders work.
While I also agree with your comments about testing first, I also accept the fact that I paid less than $3k for this plane delivered to my door! I'm sure that a more involved testing cycle would alleviate some customer issues ahead of time, but how much would it also increase the cost? For the time being, I'm still happy making the effort to help work out some of the bugs in exchange for saving a bunch of money! Were the issues more structural in nature, ie weak wings or construction, it would be a different story! But overall, for the money, I still think I'm ahead in the game. Especially if the cylinders solve the problem, this plane is golden.
As regards takeoff settings. I learned by flying the Tam SuperHornet, to use FULL flaps, hold full up elevator until you see the nose start to lighten, then ease back on the elevator for smooth takeoffs. The same process worked on this F-18F. The problem is that the AOA on our planes tends to be slightly negative. It causes the nose to be difficult to "unstick" that's why the "jump" on takeoff. I would say that Keith's 80 degree takeoff was entirely due to his having no flap set.
GAWD, I hadn't seen the photo before. Thrust is a wonderful thing! It can save you from all sorts of unfortunate predicaments we get ourselves into. That had to be a TRUE 36lbs spitting out the tail or you would have been done!
Yes, my stabs are balanced and yes it took a couple oz in each to get it done. I know there is an argument back and forth as to whether it is really necessary. But IMHO, I would never fly a plane of this size with stabs this big, having not balanced them.
David S
#537
My Feedback: (24)
RE: Flyeagle F18F
ORIGINAL: David Searles
[snip]
While I also agree with your comments about testing first, I also accept the fact that I paid less than $3k for this plane delivered to my door! I'm sure that a more involved testing cycle would alleviate some customer issues ahead of time, but how much would it also increase the cost? For the time being, I'm still happy making the effort to help work out some of the bugs in exchange for saving a bunch of money! Were the issues more structural in nature, ie weak wings or construction, it would be a different story! But overall, for the money, I still think I'm ahead in the game. Especially if the cylinders solve the problem, this plane is golden.
David S
[snip]
While I also agree with your comments about testing first, I also accept the fact that I paid less than $3k for this plane delivered to my door! I'm sure that a more involved testing cycle would alleviate some customer issues ahead of time, but how much would it also increase the cost? For the time being, I'm still happy making the effort to help work out some of the bugs in exchange for saving a bunch of money! Were the issues more structural in nature, ie weak wings or construction, it would be a different story! But overall, for the money, I still think I'm ahead in the game. Especially if the cylinders solve the problem, this plane is golden.
David S
It would seem to me that flight testing out back of the factory and getting it working right would be cheaper than sending out all of those replacement parts. James had to DHL me at least 4 times stuff from China and that can't be inexpensive.
If replacement cylinders solve the problem, you may be OK, but it sounds like a gear re-design is in order and I hope they do that if necessary...
Anyway, don't want to hijack the thread... Good luck guys.
Bob
#538
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: , FRANCE
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Agree with you david,
Concerning the gear issue, i think there is two issues : cylinder too little (not enough force, these F18 legs are really strong.. so heavy) AND locking system => On all my other FEJ models (F16 and L39) I had also taken again with the dremel the machining of the geard locking, the angle is too sharp and that blocks even in statics (At up and also down, be carefull!) not cylinder issue on L39 and F16
Regards,
sébastien
Concerning the gear issue, i think there is two issues : cylinder too little (not enough force, these F18 legs are really strong.. so heavy) AND locking system => On all my other FEJ models (F16 and L39) I had also taken again with the dremel the machining of the geard locking, the angle is too sharp and that blocks even in statics (At up and also down, be carefull!) not cylinder issue on L39 and F16
Regards,
sébastien
#539
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: norwich, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Hi David It would be really good if you could measure the postion of the C/G on yours with the weight in,also how much flap did you have on for take off,guess i will have to balance the elevators as well,did you have any rotation problem? of did it just come off nicely regards Keith
#540
My Feedback: (86)
RE: Flyeagle F18F
David,
I am assembling the flaps and ailerons now...the photo shows 40mm of Flap throw...or do they mean 40 degrees??? 40mm is nothing really. Can you help me on this? You fly this bird more than anyone. ON my SM F-18, Flaps are set at 20 degrees for take off and 50 degrees for landing.
Your set up and thoughts please??? I need to set the Flap hinges and sand trailing edges of wing enough for proper Flap deflection.
Thanks,
Rex
I am assembling the flaps and ailerons now...the photo shows 40mm of Flap throw...or do they mean 40 degrees??? 40mm is nothing really. Can you help me on this? You fly this bird more than anyone. ON my SM F-18, Flaps are set at 20 degrees for take off and 50 degrees for landing.
Your set up and thoughts please??? I need to set the Flap hinges and sand trailing edges of wing enough for proper Flap deflection.
Thanks,
Rex
#541
Senior Member
My Feedback: (36)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
I tried a little experiment with the front nose gear.
I had an extra SkyMaster cylinder that was an extra from my F4 main gear, it seemed to be the same length with a larger diameter. I needed to shave off some steel so the end nipples fit perfectly into the side frame holes. I also took a mini file and softly smoothed out the steep angle in the lock positions of the side frames.
After getting everything back together and setting air tank to 110 pounds pressure there was nothing I could do to hold the gear from moving in the direction it wanted. I did not need to tap, push or give negative pressure to get the gear to work well.
I think with new larger diameter air cylinders and slightly smoothing out the lock on the side frames of the gear that this is the cure.
I cant be sure till the actual test flight, but this modification sure has authority.
Kevin
I had an extra SkyMaster cylinder that was an extra from my F4 main gear, it seemed to be the same length with a larger diameter. I needed to shave off some steel so the end nipples fit perfectly into the side frame holes. I also took a mini file and softly smoothed out the steep angle in the lock positions of the side frames.
After getting everything back together and setting air tank to 110 pounds pressure there was nothing I could do to hold the gear from moving in the direction it wanted. I did not need to tap, push or give negative pressure to get the gear to work well.
I think with new larger diameter air cylinders and slightly smoothing out the lock on the side frames of the gear that this is the cure.
I cant be sure till the actual test flight, but this modification sure has authority.
Kevin
#542
My Feedback: (49)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SANTA ANA, CA
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Keith,
I will measure CG one evening this week and let you know. I've just about got the video ready to upload, I think.
I didn't have a problem with rotation. The plane did seem just a bit nose heavy, but rotated easily about the spot I would have thought.
I am using 40 degrees of flap for both takeoff and landing. Experience has shown, with all the Hornet models I have flown, that it helps get the nose up smoothly rather than that "OH SH*T" sudden leap off .
Rex,
Anything more than 45 degrees is adding more drag than creating more lift. I still need to play with the flap setting to find what's right to smooth out the landing profile. As I said and you will see in the video, departure when the wings stop creating enough lift is fairly abrupt at the current settings.
David S
I will measure CG one evening this week and let you know. I've just about got the video ready to upload, I think.
I didn't have a problem with rotation. The plane did seem just a bit nose heavy, but rotated easily about the spot I would have thought.
I am using 40 degrees of flap for both takeoff and landing. Experience has shown, with all the Hornet models I have flown, that it helps get the nose up smoothly rather than that "OH SH*T" sudden leap off .
Rex,
Anything more than 45 degrees is adding more drag than creating more lift. I still need to play with the flap setting to find what's right to smooth out the landing profile. As I said and you will see in the video, departure when the wings stop creating enough lift is fairly abrupt at the current settings.
David S
#543
My Feedback: (15)
RE: Flyeagle F18F
ORIGINAL: Mr DJ
David
I was going with the same smartfly but with li ion battsa123s are heavy. I have time, I will look into Emcotec system-that puppy is sweet...
Thanks...
ORIGINAL: David Jackson
DJ,
I will be using the Smartfly EQ10, TurboReg, and two 5000+ mah A123 battery packs. To run everything from the receiver would require my using Y harnesses for elevator, rudder, flaps, and aileron. I prefer not using Y harnesses with high-output digital servos.
DJ,
I will be using the Smartfly EQ10, TurboReg, and two 5000+ mah A123 battery packs. To run everything from the receiver would require my using Y harnesses for elevator, rudder, flaps, and aileron. I prefer not using Y harnesses with high-output digital servos.
I was going with the same smartfly but with li ion battsa123s are heavy. I have time, I will look into Emcotec system-that puppy is sweet...
Thanks...
#544
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: athelstone, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
hay we have fitted 2 hi flow intarco retract valves 1 to the front gear and 1 to the rear gear this dose mean 3 air systems in the plane but we have had no problems with set up.
we put the front 1 right next to retract and run it at 120-130 psi.
the doors and brakes are on the 3rd air system we are using servos four the canopy.
we put the front 1 right next to retract and run it at 120-130 psi.
the doors and brakes are on the 3rd air system we are using servos four the canopy.
#545
My Feedback: (49)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SANTA ANA, CA
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Guys,
I'm having problems getting this video uploaded properly. First time I've done it. There is a video on youtube but ther's no sound and the vid is pixilated. I'll keep trying to get something better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY0TN7jnqmQ
David S
If any of you videophiles can help. I'm trying to convert my AVI file from the video camera to a file that youtube will accept. Each time I convert it, the audio gets stripped. Any ideas?
I'm having problems getting this video uploaded properly. First time I've done it. There is a video on youtube but ther's no sound and the vid is pixilated. I'll keep trying to get something better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY0TN7jnqmQ
David S
If any of you videophiles can help. I'm trying to convert my AVI file from the video camera to a file that youtube will accept. Each time I convert it, the audio gets stripped. Any ideas?
#546
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Hi David
well done it looks good ones all the little problems are sorted out I am sure she is going to be a good machine,I am working on mine
but I got held up as I am busy at work[:@] but I hope to get some more time over xmas
I had a few of the air rams that where leaking and a broken gear door ,but all where replaced by Flyeagle great service thanks James
I am going to try and see what can be done with the retraction problem.
all the best
Andreas
well done it looks good ones all the little problems are sorted out I am sure she is going to be a good machine,I am working on mine
but I got held up as I am busy at work[:@] but I hope to get some more time over xmas
I had a few of the air rams that where leaking and a broken gear door ,but all where replaced by Flyeagle great service thanks James
I am going to try and see what can be done with the retraction problem.
all the best
Andreas
#547
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tomball,
TX
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Flyeagle F18F
Try converting to a .wmv or even and mpg/mpeg file. WMV is better suited for the web. Don't know what kind of converter you are using but if is somewhat new it should support the WMV formats
#549
RE: Flyeagle F18F
ORIGINAL: David Searles
Guys,
I'm having problems getting this video uploaded properly. First time I've done it. There is a video on youtube but ther's no sound and the vid is pixilated. I'll keep trying to get something better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY0TN7jnqmQ
David S
If any of you videophiles can help. I'm trying to convert my AVI file from the video camera to a file that youtube will accept. Each time I convert it, the audio gets stripped. Any ideas?
Guys,
I'm having problems getting this video uploaded properly. First time I've done it. There is a video on youtube but ther's no sound and the vid is pixilated. I'll keep trying to get something better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aY0TN7jnqmQ
David S
If any of you videophiles can help. I'm trying to convert my AVI file from the video camera to a file that youtube will accept. Each time I convert it, the audio gets stripped. Any ideas?
Nice maiden David...greased her in! Can't wait to get mine in.
Andy
#550
RE: Flyeagle F18F
david
My usually use PInacle Studio to convert and format my videos from the camera to dvd or youtube... it is very good
see
www.youtube.com/heraldoboldrin
My usually use PInacle Studio to convert and format my videos from the camera to dvd or youtube... it is very good
see
www.youtube.com/heraldoboldrin