Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 Torque tubes vs external linkages >

Torque tubes vs external linkages

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Torque tubes vs external linkages

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2009 | 07:55 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: N/A, AP
Default Torque tubes vs external linkages

Ive noticed that there seems to be a preference toward external horns. why is that? has anyone had problems with torque tubes?
Old 09-30-2009 | 05:01 PM
  #2  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: N/A, AP
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages

someone? anyone?
Old 09-30-2009 | 07:04 PM
  #3  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,049
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
From: Springfield, VA,
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages

BVM told me that they use torque tubes on his F-80 for the flaps. The servo is in the fuse.. This is for the EDF version, I don't know about the turbine version.
Old 09-30-2009 | 07:21 PM
  #4  
ianober's Avatar
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages

I don't like them personally because they are a pain to install, overtime they develop slop because of metal on metal wear, they have a certain amount of flex to them and there are better ways to do concealed linkages (twist drive system ...forgot the official name).
Old 09-30-2009 | 10:09 PM
  #5  
roger.alli's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,016
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Sydney NSW , AUSTRALIA
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages


ORIGINAL: bambam102

Ive noticed that there seems to be a preference toward external horns. why is that? has anyone had problems with torque tubes?
I think it is because external horns are, 1) Very easy to install and rig, 2) Very very effective, with minimum play/slop. Both important qualities in todays high performance ARF jets.

Torque tubes on the other hand have the advantage of being 1) Internal, (low drag). 2) Invisible. The down side is they are much harder to install, and, if not done corretly can induce play/slop.

However, if torque tubes are designed and installed well they are just as effective as direct linkage. All the BVM Bandits (except the BARF) use internal torque tubes on elevator, and these are some of the fastest jets around.

And for scale fidelity, torque tubes are the only option.

Roger

Old 10-01-2009 | 02:50 PM
  #6  
smchale's Avatar
My Feedback: (67)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,809
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Philadelphia PA
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages


ORIGINAL: ianober

I don't like them personally because they are a pain to install, overtime they develop slop because of metal on metal wear, they have a certain amount of flex to them and there are better ways to do concealed linkages (twist drive system ...forgot the official name).
RDS - Rotary Drive System.

http://www.irfmachineworks.com/rds/
Old 10-01-2009 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: N/A, AP
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages

Ok, this is just what I thought. I guess it just depends on scale vs convenience. external linkages a huge eyesore. torque tubes a huge butt hurt source.
I havent worked with the RDS system but looking at it, The first thing that jumps out at me is although it is direct drive, the rod length may possibly introduce a torsional spring effect.
Old 10-01-2009 | 04:13 PM
  #8  
Banned
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Van Nuys, CA
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages

I think the other good thing about external horns is that you see them all the time and (IF) one is loose or broke from transporting you see it rather than finding out in the air.

My 2 cents
Old 10-01-2009 | 04:18 PM
  #9  
ianober's Avatar
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages


ORIGINAL: smchale


ORIGINAL: ianober

I don't like them personally because they are a pain to install, overtime they develop slop because of metal on metal wear, they have a certain amount of flex to them and there are better ways to do concealed linkages (twist drive system ...forgot the official name).
RDS - Rotary Drive System.

http://www.irfmachineworks.com/rds/

Thank you Sean, the acronym had escaped me!!!
Old 10-01-2009 | 05:53 PM
  #10  
smchale's Avatar
My Feedback: (67)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,809
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Philadelphia PA
Default RE: Torque tubes vs external linkages


ORIGINAL: bambam102

I havent worked with the RDS system but looking at it, The first thing that jumps out at me is although it is direct drive, the rod length may possibly introduce a torsional spring effect.
This should eliviate any of your concerns:

http://www.hauninger.gmxhome.de/hobb...g/RDS/RDS.html

It does act as a torque rod, but much more torque is required than your servo would handle. ie. your servo would fail before the rod would twist.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.