Torque tubes vs external linkages
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: N/A,
AP
Ive noticed that there seems to be a preference toward external horns. why is that? has anyone had problems with torque tubes?
#4

My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Scottsdale, AZ
I don't like them personally because they are a pain to install, overtime they develop slop because of metal on metal wear, they have a certain amount of flex to them and there are better ways to do concealed linkages (twist drive system ...forgot the official name).
#5
ORIGINAL: bambam102
Ive noticed that there seems to be a preference toward external horns. why is that? has anyone had problems with torque tubes?
Ive noticed that there seems to be a preference toward external horns. why is that? has anyone had problems with torque tubes?
Torque tubes on the other hand have the advantage of being 1) Internal, (low drag). 2) Invisible. The down side is they are much harder to install, and, if not done corretly can induce play/slop.
However, if torque tubes are designed and installed well they are just as effective as direct linkage. All the BVM Bandits (except the BARF) use internal torque tubes on elevator, and these are some of the fastest jets around.
And for scale fidelity, torque tubes are the only option.
Roger
#6

My Feedback: (67)
ORIGINAL: ianober
I don't like them personally because they are a pain to install, overtime they develop slop because of metal on metal wear, they have a certain amount of flex to them and there are better ways to do concealed linkages (twist drive system ...forgot the official name).
I don't like them personally because they are a pain to install, overtime they develop slop because of metal on metal wear, they have a certain amount of flex to them and there are better ways to do concealed linkages (twist drive system ...forgot the official name).
http://www.irfmachineworks.com/rds/
#7
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: N/A,
AP
Ok, this is just what I thought. I guess it just depends on scale vs convenience. external linkages a huge eyesore. torque tubes a huge butt hurt source.
I havent worked with the RDS system but looking at it, The first thing that jumps out at me is although it is direct drive, the rod length may possibly introduce a torsional spring effect.
I havent worked with the RDS system but looking at it, The first thing that jumps out at me is although it is direct drive, the rod length may possibly introduce a torsional spring effect.
#8
Banned
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Van Nuys, CA
I think the other good thing about external horns is that you see them all the time and (IF) one is loose or broke from transporting you see it rather than finding out in the air.
My 2 cents
My 2 cents
#9

My Feedback: (12)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Scottsdale, AZ
ORIGINAL: smchale
RDS - Rotary Drive System.
http://www.irfmachineworks.com/rds/
ORIGINAL: ianober
I don't like them personally because they are a pain to install, overtime they develop slop because of metal on metal wear, they have a certain amount of flex to them and there are better ways to do concealed linkages (twist drive system ...forgot the official name).
I don't like them personally because they are a pain to install, overtime they develop slop because of metal on metal wear, they have a certain amount of flex to them and there are better ways to do concealed linkages (twist drive system ...forgot the official name).
http://www.irfmachineworks.com/rds/
Thank you Sean, the acronym had escaped me!!!
#10

My Feedback: (67)
ORIGINAL: bambam102
I havent worked with the RDS system but looking at it, The first thing that jumps out at me is although it is direct drive, the rod length may possibly introduce a torsional spring effect.
I havent worked with the RDS system but looking at it, The first thing that jumps out at me is although it is direct drive, the rod length may possibly introduce a torsional spring effect.
http://www.hauninger.gmxhome.de/hobb...g/RDS/RDS.html
It does act as a torque rod, but much more torque is required than your servo would handle. ie. your servo would fail before the rod would twist.




