Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
 Wing loading. >

Wing loading.

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

Wing loading.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2009 | 08:09 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Citrus Heights , CA
Default Wing loading.

Hello.

Does an AD Rafale consider a flying brick with the wing loading of 64oz per sq/ft? This number came from some of the calculator
online i used. Also, when measure the wing chords on these deltas, does the measurements includes the trailing edge of the elevons, or just
up to the point where the elevons attaches to the wing with hinges? Thank you.
Old 11-05-2009 | 09:25 PM
  #2  
Hustler58's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,484
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Mansfield, TX
Default RE: Wing loading.

When figuring wing area you figure all the area. Even theoretical area.(Which is the area in the fuse) For example on the B-58 wing the area is 2868.51 / 144= 19.92 sq ft. If the plane weighs 55# x 16oz = 880oz / 19.92 sq ft = 44.17 oz wing loading. Hope I didn't confuse you with this. 64oz wing loading is fairly light on a jet.Butch
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Sq47450.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	34.0 KB
ID:	1308625   Click image for larger version

Name:	Yt62342.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	28.3 KB
ID:	1308626  
Old 11-05-2009 | 09:41 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Citrus Heights , CA
Default RE: Wing loading.

I am confused now sir. Not by any means you, but i am just generally confused about it. My AD Rafale came out at 26.5 lbs dry,
I am just getting ready and arming myself with as much info about it as i could. Hopefully, before i may find out it is a flying brick. LOL
Old 11-05-2009 | 10:00 PM
  #4  
I-NAV's Avatar
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mililani, HI
Default RE: Wing loading.

Don't get too hung up on wing loading... Wing loading doesn't have the same significance in jets, as in say, a warbird. We fly our landing approaches nose-high and power on. High wing loading means a higher stall speed which we compensate for by a higher approach speed, and hopefully, a longer runway....


I had a F-104 with a wing loading of over 100oz per SQFT. Approach speed was around 50mph..

A Rafal should land pretty slow if you keep the nose up and the power on until touch-down.
Old 11-05-2009 | 10:06 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Citrus Heights , CA
Default RE: Wing loading.

F-104, now that's a brick. Just kiddin. Thank you for the info. The more the better right.
Old 11-05-2009 | 11:49 PM
  #6  
LGM Graphix's Avatar
My Feedback: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,823
Received 61 Likes on 43 Posts
From: Abbotsford, BC, CANADA
Default RE: Wing loading.

You'll be fine, if you calculated your wing loading at 64oz and you ONLY included the wing that will be light on a Rafale, the Rafale has a very large lifting moment in the fuse as well. I assume your AD Rafale is the large one, 26.5 lbs for the small one would be very very heavy, but for the large one that is reasonably light actually.
Old 11-06-2009 | 02:14 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Citrus Heights , CA
Default RE: Wing loading.

It is the larger 1/6.8 version. Had tried my best to keep the weight down. The calculator software online i used didn't even included the area of the
elevons at all. I only measured from the LE to the part where the hinges are. I didn't know if the elevons should be included or not. I also tried to include
the elevons, and the numbers came out to about 47.8 oz/sqft. Please excuse all the funny questions. Its my first jet after all. LOL
Old 11-06-2009 | 03:23 AM
  #8  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,663
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Malta, MALTA
Default RE: Wing loading.

I think you also missed the fact that today's fighter jets will not only have any lifting wings but also lifting fuselages. The F-16 is one of them and believe that the Rafale also has that additional benefit.

Reuben
Old 11-06-2009 | 12:38 PM
  #9  
thunderceptor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Padova, ITALY
Default RE: Wing loading.

Jet models have a very high wing loading compared to standard prop models, about 3 times more! [X(][X(][X(]
That's why is so important to choose a very efficient airfoil, as Eric Rantet of AD does on all of his models.
Other producers don't take care of this problem, and choose to enlarge the original airfoil: the result is an airplane with high wing loading and low efficiency profile, meaning a higher stall speed and a low glide ratio.

Here is a video that shows an AD Rafale landing:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-aPDjlLqb4[/youtube]
Old 11-06-2009 | 05:56 PM
  #10  
CraigG's Avatar
My Feedback: (40)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,098
Received 36 Likes on 22 Posts
From: Sautee Nacoochee, GA
Default RE: Wing loading.

I think the big AD Rafale is similar in size to the BVM Rafale. In fact, some guys even use the BV landing gear in the AD. My BV Rafale is close to 35lbs dry and it flys just fine. However, as with any "heavy metal" jets, it flys with power. You should be fine at 26.5lbs.

Craig
Old 11-07-2009 | 03:22 AM
  #11  
JohnMac's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
From: Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Wing loading.

The canards are also lifting area on the Rafale or any canard. But you are worrying about nothing. The AD Rafale flies very well indeed in both sizes. They also land very slowly.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.