Mounting Engine to Falcon 120 (Bobcat Copy)
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (34)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Peoria,
AZ
Have a Fuji 43EI gasser that I need to mount to a Falcon 120. Building this as a prop-pusher and will eventually swap the gasser for a turbine.
My issue is how to mount the Fuji to the Falcon? The engine mount on the falcon is meant for a glow engine installation and not a firewall installation like the gassers. Anyone done this before and can send pictures or details on the best way to go about it?
Thanks in advance
John
My issue is how to mount the Fuji to the Falcon? The engine mount on the falcon is meant for a glow engine installation and not a firewall installation like the gassers. Anyone done this before and can send pictures or details on the best way to go about it?
Thanks in advance
John
#2

My Feedback: (106)
John, With all the threads I'v seen about the Falcon 120, and also looking at mine, I have never seen this done. Don't know if you could get enough lead in the nose to accomplish this. Sell your Fuji and get a Moki 180. Good luck with whatever you come up with!!
#3
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (34)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Peoria,
AZ
ORIGINAL: hooker53
John, With all the threads I'v seen about the Falcon 120, and also looking at mine, I have never seen this done. Don't know if you could get enough lead in the nose to accomplish this. Sell your Fuji and get a Moki 180. Good luck with whatever you come up with!!
John, With all the threads I'v seen about the Falcon 120, and also looking at mine, I have never seen this done. Don't know if you could get enough lead in the nose to accomplish this. Sell your Fuji and get a Moki 180. Good luck with whatever you come up with!!
I saw one person talking about doing it, but never saw the finished product.
#6
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus, a Fuji would rip it straight off the back, would be an interesting first flight, but rather short I think. 
Mike

Mike
#7
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus,
Unbelievably the designers put a great lump of heavy wood in the rear 'shelf' area to bolt the engine to but it stops where the shelf stops, there is no overlap into the fuselage.
This was my solution, a bit agricultural but it works.
And it looks great from the top! - John.
#8
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (34)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Peoria,
AZ
ORIGINAL: BaldEagel
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus, a Fuji would rip it straight off the back, would be an interesting first flight, but rather short I think.
Mike
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus, a Fuji would rip it straight off the back, would be an interesting first flight, but rather short I think.

Mike
#9

My Feedback: (106)
Well I can perfectly see why you are wanting to go gas after the JJ.
but get you a OS or Moki 160/180 and be grey hairs ahead of the game!! I think a Saito 180 would be a good match. Prop wise. Just don't want to deal with the P-factor on a model like this.
but get you a OS or Moki 160/180 and be grey hairs ahead of the game!! I think a Saito 180 would be a good match. Prop wise. Just don't want to deal with the P-factor on a model like this.
#10
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (34)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Peoria,
AZ
ORIGINAL: hooker53
Well I can perfectly see why you are wanting to go gas after the JJ.
but get you a OS or Moki 160/180 and be grey hairs ahead of the game!! I think a Saito 180 would be a good match. Prop wise. Just don't want to deal with the P-factor on a model like this.
Well I can perfectly see why you are wanting to go gas after the JJ.
but get you a OS or Moki 160/180 and be grey hairs ahead of the game!! I think a Saito 180 would be a good match. Prop wise. Just don't want to deal with the P-factor on a model like this.
Actually I had great luck with the JJ - I guess I was one of the lucky ones.
Got the gasser to run on the falcon till I can get another turbine, and then slap the fuji on a small YAK or something. Also wanted to go gasser as I wanted smoke on the falcon, and you can't get real good smoke on a GLOW engine.
The plane is designed for a prop engine, so I would hope they designed it with p-factor in mind. I guess I can do a little more research on the others that have pusher props on this model to see if p-factor is a big issue.
I guess only time will tell. If it doesn't fly right, I will have to put a turbine on it sooner than I planned.
Looks like some bottom re-inforcement and a good "L" bracket will at least let me get here in the air and see how it goes.
#11
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (34)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Peoria,
AZ
ORIGINAL: Boomerang1
The smaller Chinese Bobcats are the same, my rear fuse was already cracked when I bought this one crashed.
Unbelievably the designers put a great lump of heavy wood in the rear 'shelf' area to bolt the engine to but it stops where the shelf stops, there is no overlap into the fuselage.
This was my solution, a bit agricultural but it works.
And it looks great from the top! - John.
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus,
Unbelievably the designers put a great lump of heavy wood in the rear 'shelf' area to bolt the engine to but it stops where the shelf stops, there is no overlap into the fuselage.
This was my solution, a bit agricultural but it works.
And it looks great from the top! - John.
#12
ORIGINAL: mtndewdewd
Do you think the weight is the issue or the thrust? The weight is just over a pound more and the thrust (based on the prop I will be using) is the same as a JetJoe I had on a previous Falcon.
ORIGINAL: BaldEagel
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus, a Fuji would rip it straight off the back, would be an interesting first flight, but rather short I think.
Mike
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus, a Fuji would rip it straight off the back, would be an interesting first flight, but rather short I think.

Mike
Mike
EDIT: Canterlever should be 1/3 out 2/3's in i.e. if the overhang is 50mm the inside support should go internally by 100mm.
#13
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (34)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Peoria,
AZ
ORIGINAL: BaldEagel
Neither I think the issue will be the vibration and the loading on a not so perfect landing, I drilled a 11mm hole through from the back into the inside area of the fus and Hysoled in a 10mm carbon rod along the root internal rib, the problem with the bottom brackets in the Falcon is they have nothing to attach too.
Mike
EDIT: Canterlever should be 1/3 out 2/3's in i.e. if the overhang is 50mm the inside support should go internally by 100mm.
ORIGINAL: mtndewdewd
Do you think the weight is the issue or the thrust? The weight is just over a pound more and the thrust (based on the prop I will be using) is the same as a JetJoe I had on a previous Falcon.
ORIGINAL: BaldEagel
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus, a Fuji would rip it straight off the back, would be an interesting first flight, but rather short I think.
Mike
The rear cantilever section of the fus does not have any internal support its only supported by the glassfibre skin of the fus, a Fuji would rip it straight off the back, would be an interesting first flight, but rather short I think.

Mike
Mike
EDIT: Canterlever should be 1/3 out 2/3's in i.e. if the overhang is 50mm the inside support should go internally by 100mm.
#14
Yes I do, its already on the Falcon 120 thread, but I don't have it to hand at the moment as its 2400 in the UK at the moment, will not be back on line until Wednesday, but look early in the Falcon thread and you will find it.
Mike
EDIT: 93 for the wheel well and 97 for the rear cantilever support.
Mike
EDIT: 93 for the wheel well and 97 for the rear cantilever support.
#15

My Feedback: (49)
Do you think the weight is the issue or the thrust?
Joe
#16
Where did you get the bottom brackets?
#17
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (34)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Peoria,
AZ
ORIGINAL: joeflyer
The weight of the engine is a problem. There is not enough structure at the rear fuse. You can beef it up as many have done for turbine applications, but with a gasoline engine it will be heavy and will be a dog due to insufficient rpm.
Joe
Do you think the weight is the issue or the thrust?
Joe
#19

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: tehachapi,
CA
i make some C/F stiffeners for the falcon ...there are pics of them on RCG in the flacon EDf thread ...but the alum home made ones are cheaper



