BUGGIES_R_US

I sure am glad I looked into this "noobie" thread!!!

Great discussion indeed.

I wish everone would disagree like Sean and i8tweety did.
I commend you guys!!!

ram

i8tweety

My Feedback: (11)

Actually, the fuel was vaporized in the experiment. It was the vaporized (evaporated) fuel in the flask that was being ignited. The only thing missing was compression, which in my opinion (and supported by the research I've done over the past few days), plays a role on timing (specifically expediting) combustion in a nitro engine, but isn't required to create the chain reaction (repeated burn cycles without outside intervention).

And yes, I would like an electron microscope. Would anyone happen to have one to spare?

blue62

My Feedback: (3)

oh well we have thought this to death, lets go fly!!!


john

halb0971

My Feedback: (2)

I haven't installed the wings on my GT yet.

blue62

My Feedback: (3)

well whatya waitin for? too much thinkin i guess huh?

john

oh yeah i can't fly my engine took a c**p and now i am without propulsion!!!


don't ya hate it when that happens?

halb0971

My Feedback: (2)

I haven't properly engineered it yet. LOL

Besides the fastest way around a track is on the ground.

Sean

blue62

My Feedback: (3)

d'oh!!! to quote Homer Simpson. just like me to bring my plane to a truck discussion!!! i respectfully remove myself!!

john

halb0971

My Feedback: (2)

Excellent quote, I use it daily myself.

Its all good bring a plane view to the ground world, some of us cross over too.

Sean

i8tweety

My Feedback: (11)

Well, I certainly drove the discussion away from the original thread, didn't I? The thread really belongs in the engine discussion forum as it's just interesting (or boring) for the plane folks (plain folks too, I guess).

blue62

My Feedback: (3)

lol yes thats why i got interested in it to start with

john