x factor vs mad force
#26
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Long branch,
NJ
The x-factor would be a better option just because it has a 4-link suspension and a bigger(torquey) motor. Just use savage stub axles on the x-factor and you can run any maxx size tires, my sugestion would be 40s and either of the treads they offer for them. You really dont even need a good cyl. head unless you need to lean it out for more power, but it should have the grunt. Definatley go up 7-8 teeth on the spur, or use a savage spur and stock clutch. Talk to dirk diggler he has a rock x-fac.
#29
c'mon now, the guy asked which truck for rock crawling....and you guys went on to argue which is faster etc....is speed even important for "crawling"??? how about just giving your input to help the guy out....rather than criticizing everything the guy after you had said...skate, get both and tell us about them ...j/k...I think Xfactor is a better crawler skate, but then again, somebody says the madforce beat the Xfactor in RCCA, but you also have to consider the skills of the driver.
#33
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Who z\' whats it,
YT, BOTSWANA
lol...There are several reasons why i want my forum back up. This type of thread is one of those reasons. I've owned a mad force, its pretty nice, and durable. Do i think its nearly as functional as a rock climber? No, not ever, not compared to the TXT's, and the X factor.
Matt
Matt
#34
Thermal, I'm planning to get a MAD FORCE, GOOD IDEA??? Do you know if I would be able to put 8 Shocks in the regular MADFORCE like in the RCX edition?




