Basic basher
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Norwood,
OH
T-maxx sucks (I've had two), Aftershock isn't as strong as the LST2 and takes enough money to upgrade to LST2 specs to make it LESS of a good deal than the LST2, and the Revo's engine blows goats. Savage, bang for the buck, is the only way to fly IMO
#5

The T-Maxx shouldn't even be considered against a Savage or Aftershock, there's just no comparison. As for the Savage Vs. Aftershock most Savage owners will tell you to get a Savage, while Losi owners will tell you to get the Aftershock. Personally I would go with the Aftershock (heh see I'm a Losi owner) but both are excellent trucks and you should be happy with either one.
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Norwood,
OH
YOU ARE WRONG, SAVAGE IS THE ONLY GOOD TRUCK!
hehe
honestly, though, if you were to ask LST2 vs Savage XL (far closer comparison) I'd say pick whichever one you think looks cooler. But, X4.6 vs Aftershock...I honestly think that there's no contest, in the Savage's favor.
But, hell, maybe i should go buy an Aftershock and try it out. Wonder how cheap used ones go for...
hehe

honestly, though, if you were to ask LST2 vs Savage XL (far closer comparison) I'd say pick whichever one you think looks cooler. But, X4.6 vs Aftershock...I honestly think that there's no contest, in the Savage's favor.
But, hell, maybe i should go buy an Aftershock and try it out. Wonder how cheap used ones go for...
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Brevard,
NC
ORIGINAL: ThunderbirdJunkie
YOU ARE WRONG, SAVAGE IS THE ONLY GOOD TRUCK!
hehe
honestly, though, if you were to ask LST2 vs Savage XL (far closer comparison) I'd say pick whichever one you think looks cooler. But, X4.6 vs Aftershock...I honestly think that there's no contest, in the Savage's favor.
But, hell, maybe i should go buy an Aftershock and try it out. Wonder how cheap used ones go for...
YOU ARE WRONG, SAVAGE IS THE ONLY GOOD TRUCK!
hehe

honestly, though, if you were to ask LST2 vs Savage XL (far closer comparison) I'd say pick whichever one you think looks cooler. But, X4.6 vs Aftershock...I honestly think that there's no contest, in the Savage's favor.
But, hell, maybe i should go buy an Aftershock and try it out. Wonder how cheap used ones go for...
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Norwood,
OH
K dude, way to take yourself way too seriously
LOL, it's a GST! one of two MT's on the market that have WORSE shocks than a Savage...come on, dude. Get over yourself, and it was a joke.

LOL, it's a GST! one of two MT's on the market that have WORSE shocks than a Savage...come on, dude. Get over yourself, and it was a joke.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: Torchy the Fiery Fast RC Turtl
Yeah, that is a GST/Nemesis/Genesis. That truck I can say is tougher than both a Savage or LST2. I hate admitting taht since Savages are my favorite truck, but I have seen a Genesis/GST take alot of hits my Savage would have been limping away from.
I do agree with you, the LST and LST2 has a very nice layout which makes its handling superior to that of a Savage. And yes, the Savage would would need alot of upgrades to improve its handling.
As far has durability? I'd dare say teh Savage has teh edge. Dont get me wrong, the LST2 does have a good rugged design, so it can take some hits too.
I do agree with you, the LST and LST2 has a very nice layout which makes its handling superior to that of a Savage. And yes, the Savage would would need alot of upgrades to improve its handling.
As far has durability? I'd dare say teh Savage has teh edge. Dont get me wrong, the LST2 does have a good rugged design, so it can take some hits too.
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hillsborough,
CA
Gotta say hands down, that you'd be better off with an Aftershock and about 30$$'s of upgrades than with a savage X any day!!!
Savages are sooooooooooo overrated in terms of handling, durability, drivetrain, tranny, and build quality... The aftershock has amazing shocks and it verrrrryyy durable with some basic lst2 upgrades
Savages are sooooooooooo overrated in terms of handling, durability, drivetrain, tranny, and build quality... The aftershock has amazing shocks and it verrrrryyy durable with some basic lst2 upgrades
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 22,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Norwood,
OH
Uh
Show me how the Savage's drivetrain is overrated? Show me how the Aftershock shocks, that have never been on truck that's moved under its own power, are good, when they're leaking oil ALL OVER my desk?
Good thing I'm getting some aluminum shock bodies for free, or else I'd just throw them in the trash can...
I will drive my Savage head-on into an Aftershock, with us both going top speed, and we will see who comes out still drivable.
Sure, it doesn't handle well stock..but neither does an Aftershock.
After a good bash day...only two of these cars were still operable (aside from a radio issue in the buggy)...I'll give you a hint. It wasn't the Revo, and it wasn't the LST...and guess which one of them disabled the LST...and kept on truckin' (not the Savage and not the Revo...)
Show me how the Savage's drivetrain is overrated? Show me how the Aftershock shocks, that have never been on truck that's moved under its own power, are good, when they're leaking oil ALL OVER my desk?
Good thing I'm getting some aluminum shock bodies for free, or else I'd just throw them in the trash can...
I will drive my Savage head-on into an Aftershock, with us both going top speed, and we will see who comes out still drivable.
Sure, it doesn't handle well stock..but neither does an Aftershock.
After a good bash day...only two of these cars were still operable (aside from a radio issue in the buggy)...I'll give you a hint. It wasn't the Revo, and it wasn't the LST...and guess which one of them disabled the LST...and kept on truckin' (not the Savage and not the Revo...)
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mesa,
AZ
ORIGINAL: HPI_Savage_RC
I can't believe people would even begin to compare any Losi MT's durability to that of the Savage. The Savage has a better chassis design, and much tougher plastics.
I can't believe people would even begin to compare any Losi MT's durability to that of the Savage. The Savage has a better chassis design, and much tougher plastics.
#16

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've also seen plenty of bent TVPs and cracked engine plates. It takes a really good hit to break them (A stock Revo or LST2 would have numerous broken parts as well), but it does happen. Thing is, you can fix the issue for less than $100 (Keep in mind that I said chassis DESIGN, not chassis), and customize length, positioning of all chassis components, and thickness and design while you're at it. There is currently no aftermarket fix for this.

I have a drawer full of broken LST shock shafts that prove the stock Savage shocks are more durable.
Broken arms, yes it does happen, but in 4 years, I have broken 2, and considering what I was doing to the truck at the time, I would expect them to break. Messed up landings from 20ft in the air, and both arms were still usable, having split at only one of the 3 mounting points. The original 21/25 arms are IMO, more durable than RPM arms.

I have a drawer full of broken LST shock shafts that prove the stock Savage shocks are more durable.
Broken arms, yes it does happen, but in 4 years, I have broken 2, and considering what I was doing to the truck at the time, I would expect them to break. Messed up landings from 20ft in the air, and both arms were still usable, having split at only one of the 3 mounting points. The original 21/25 arms are IMO, more durable than RPM arms.
#17
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mesa,
AZ
ORIGINAL: HPI_Savage_RC
I've also seen plenty of bent TVPs and cracked engine plates. It takes a really good hit to break them (A stock Revo or LST2 would have numerous broken parts as well), but it does happen. Thing is, you can fix the issue for less than $100 (Keep in mind that I said chassis DESIGN, not chassis), and customize length, positioning of all chassis components, and thickness and design while you're at it. There is currently no aftermarket fix for this.

I have a drawer full of broken LST shock shafts that prove the stock Savage shocks are more durable.
Broken arms, yes it does happen, but in 4 years, I have broken 2, and considering what I was doing to the truck at the time, I would expect them to break. Messed up landings from 20ft in the air, and both arms were still usable, having split at only one of the 3 mounting points. The original 21/25 arms are IMO, more durable than RPM arms.
I've also seen plenty of bent TVPs and cracked engine plates. It takes a really good hit to break them (A stock Revo or LST2 would have numerous broken parts as well), but it does happen. Thing is, you can fix the issue for less than $100 (Keep in mind that I said chassis DESIGN, not chassis), and customize length, positioning of all chassis components, and thickness and design while you're at it. There is currently no aftermarket fix for this.

I have a drawer full of broken LST shock shafts that prove the stock Savage shocks are more durable.
Broken arms, yes it does happen, but in 4 years, I have broken 2, and considering what I was doing to the truck at the time, I would expect them to break. Messed up landings from 20ft in the air, and both arms were still usable, having split at only one of the 3 mounting points. The original 21/25 arms are IMO, more durable than RPM arms.

Sorry to say it, bro... but the Savage's chassis design is old news. I'm not saying LST2's chassis design is the best thing since sliced bread... but, your reaction to the pure audacity that someone would compare the antiquated design of the Savage to the newer design of the LST2... quite honestly.. made me laugh out loud...
#18

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Savage's chassis design is 6 years old. The LST's chassis design is 4 year old. Wow, so much more modern.
20' high single wheeled landings will leave every other truck on the market limping away with a broken suspension arm. Both Losi and Traxxas use a glass filled composite that has a much lower impact strength, and lower toughness (Look up the definition) than HPI's nylon.
The TVP design is most certainly the best. You seem to be lost amongst the sheeple *cough* I mean people who believe that newer is automatically better. Do me a favor, and have a structural engineer do a stress analysis on both the LST's chassis and the Savage's. He will tell you that the TVP structure is far superior, guaranteed.

20' high single wheeled landings will leave every other truck on the market limping away with a broken suspension arm. Both Losi and Traxxas use a glass filled composite that has a much lower impact strength, and lower toughness (Look up the definition) than HPI's nylon.
The TVP design is most certainly the best. You seem to be lost amongst the sheeple *cough* I mean people who believe that newer is automatically better. Do me a favor, and have a structural engineer do a stress analysis on both the LST's chassis and the Savage's. He will tell you that the TVP structure is far superior, guaranteed.
#20
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mesa,
AZ
ORIGINAL: HPI_Savage_RC
The Savage's chassis design is 6 years old. The LST's chassis design is 4 year old. Wow, so much more modern.
20' high single wheeled landings will leave every other truck on the market limping away with a broken suspension arm. Both Losi and Traxxas use a glass filled composite that has a much lower impact strength, and lower toughness (Look up the definition) than HPI's nylon.
The TVP design is most certainly the best. You seem to be lost amongst the sheeple *cough* I mean people who believe that newer is automatically better. Do me a favor, and have a structural engineer do a stress analysis on both the LST's chassis and the Savage's. He will tell you that the TVP structure is far superior, guaranteed.
The Savage's chassis design is 6 years old. The LST's chassis design is 4 year old. Wow, so much more modern.

20' high single wheeled landings will leave every other truck on the market limping away with a broken suspension arm. Both Losi and Traxxas use a glass filled composite that has a much lower impact strength, and lower toughness (Look up the definition) than HPI's nylon.
The TVP design is most certainly the best. You seem to be lost amongst the sheeple *cough* I mean people who believe that newer is automatically better. Do me a favor, and have a structural engineer do a stress analysis on both the LST's chassis and the Savage's. He will tell you that the TVP structure is far superior, guaranteed.
I haven't had to touch the chassis on my LST2 or my Revo... and I've taken my Revo past 20' in the air.... without breaking an arm.... as a matter of fact... I took my Revo 20' in the air with a broken arm... and it didn't suffer any further damage. If I still had my ramp... I would have sent my LST2 off of it... but I got rid of it a while back.
#21

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It required upgrading because as I already stated, the DESIGN is the best, not the materials. Thus, it has the potential to be the strongest in practice as well as theory.
If you have jumped higher than 20ft without breaking your Revo's suspension arms, consider yourself lucky. The arms are a well known weak spot that most Revo owners upgrade right away.
Anyway, I am sick of arguing with a bunch of biased sheeple who have no understanding whatsoever of materials science or structural engineering. But that is my fault, I wouldn't expect to find people WITH said knowledge anywhere else but on a Savage forum.
If you have jumped higher than 20ft without breaking your Revo's suspension arms, consider yourself lucky. The arms are a well known weak spot that most Revo owners upgrade right away.
Anyway, I am sick of arguing with a bunch of biased sheeple who have no understanding whatsoever of materials science or structural engineering. But that is my fault, I wouldn't expect to find people WITH said knowledge anywhere else but on a Savage forum.
#22
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mesa,
AZ
ORIGINAL: HPI_Savage_RC
It required upgrading because as I already stated, the DESIGN is the best, not the materials. Thus, it has the potential to be the strongest in practice as well as theory.
If you have jumped higher than 20ft without breaking your Revo's suspension arms, consider yourself lucky. The arms are a well known weak spot that most Revo owners upgrade right away.
Anyway, I am sick of arguing with a bunch of biased sheeple who have no understanding whatsoever of materials science or structural engineering. But that is my fault, I wouldn't expect to find people WITH said knowledge anywhere else but on a Savage forum.
It required upgrading because as I already stated, the DESIGN is the best, not the materials. Thus, it has the potential to be the strongest in practice as well as theory.
If you have jumped higher than 20ft without breaking your Revo's suspension arms, consider yourself lucky. The arms are a well known weak spot that most Revo owners upgrade right away.
Anyway, I am sick of arguing with a bunch of biased sheeple who have no understanding whatsoever of materials science or structural engineering. But that is my fault, I wouldn't expect to find people WITH said knowledge anywhere else but on a Savage forum.
I must have gotten VERY lucky in all the 4 years I've owned my Revo... because a 20' jump has NEVER broken an A-arm on my Revo. Shock shaft? yep. Motor mount? Uh huh.... A-arm... NOPE. A smash into a tree at 30+MPH broke my A-arm... but never from a failed landing or a high jump. As I said... I have a video somewhere that has over 20 minutes of unedited footage (5 minutes edited) of 10-20' jumps all completed with a broken A-arm from previous smash into a tree... but it never broke any more.
#23

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you want to pick the insignificant terminology apart and once again evade the POINT of the post, I'll rephrase that.
The TVP platform is the best out there. HPI's material's choice is not the best, but the design is otherwise excellent, and far superior to the platform used by Losi for the LST.
Now, the LST chassis could be strong (6061-T6 decks and rails), but there is currently no aftermarket support to utilize said potential. This is why the Savage is currently superior.
As for your Revo, I suspect you managed to land every jump perfectly, because even most Revo owners will agree that your claims of what a STOCK Revo is capable of are BS.
The TVP platform is the best out there. HPI's material's choice is not the best, but the design is otherwise excellent, and far superior to the platform used by Losi for the LST.
Now, the LST chassis could be strong (6061-T6 decks and rails), but there is currently no aftermarket support to utilize said potential. This is why the Savage is currently superior.
As for your Revo, I suspect you managed to land every jump perfectly, because even most Revo owners will agree that your claims of what a STOCK Revo is capable of are BS.
#24
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Gillette,
WY
The a-arms are a love hate thing with the revo, I ran two years with the stock arms on my revo and then had the chance to buy two full sets of rpm arms for $10 heck might aswell take the deal so I bought them. I tried for along time to break the stock ones but never manage to untill one day I hit a boulder in my back yard at wot and broke the mounting ear on the upper and cracked the lower arm. The RPM arms are a little wider then stock so I replaced the fronts with rpms and left the rear alone and then I upgraded to traxxas extended rear a-arms. I have seen other revo's crack a-arms or snap them by clipping a light pole at half throttle, others I have seen get easily 20ft of air and drive away clean. My freinds truck only broke the front a-arms when his radio dyed and his failsafe didn't kick in and it slammed into a dumpster at wot and it snapped both lower arms, I had a extra set of RPM that I sold him for $10 (yea I payed $10 for two sets but I had to make some profit lol) I replaced all the arms just simply because he didn't wanna worry about the rear breaking and having to hassle with them. Last year at one of the monster bashes I got 20ft of air and landed on the right driver side tire and it drove away clean, next I was going to pull a back flip and my throttle servo glitched from the mud and water kick up on the tires and it let off the throttle so I came down on the rear of the truck....I warped my mugen wing mount (yeah mugen one of the top kit companies in the world and MUCH greater quality then hpi).


