2.4 ghz Jammers
09-03-2010, 07:57 PM
#76
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: tadawson
That's a trip to death row . . . you CANNOT know for certain what is going to happen, until it begins to happen!
A lot of folks are blowhards, and never do 1% of the spew that comes out of their mouths.
This is undoubtedly NOT an example of justification!
Or use a wee bit more brain, and just make a point of being elsewhere, or getting the appropriate law enforcement person(s)
involved . . .
- Tim
without them actually attacking you first
A lot of folks are blowhards, and never do 1% of the spew that comes out of their mouths.
This is undoubtedly NOT an example of justification!
or it would be lying in the pool of blood.
involved . . .
- Tim
09-03-2010, 10:05 PM
#77
My Feedback: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tampa,
FL
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
Also illegal is to cross-thread the face of the no-lifes who are caught jamming R/C activities. We had an incident in which a car load of toilet-bowl-children were driving past the club field with a Tx out the window and a different freq dialed up each pass (confirmed with an analyzer). Guess what would have happened if one of us had managed to catch them??? Nevermind jail time or fines, what needs to be instilled in the minds of these and potential criminals is that being caught by the police and the FCC would be a picnic compared to being tortured by a modeller whose prized creation has been destroyed by such a prank. Chances are the modeller will get out of jail before the creeps get out of the hospital!
09-03-2010, 10:46 PM
#78
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: Jaffray
Also illegal is to cross-thread the face of the no-lifes who are caught jamming R/C activities. We had an incident in which a car load of toilet-bowl-children were driving past the club field with a Tx out the window and a different freq dialed up each pass (confirmed with an analyzer). Guess what would have happened if one of us had managed to catch them??? Nevermind jail time or fines, what needs to be instilled in the minds of these and potential criminals is that being caught by the police and the FCC would be a picnic compared to being tortured by a modeller whose prized creation has been destroyed by such a prank. Chances are the modeller will get out of jail before the creeps get out of the hospital!
Also illegal is to cross-thread the face of the no-lifes who are caught jamming R/C activities. We had an incident in which a car load of toilet-bowl-children were driving past the club field with a Tx out the window and a different freq dialed up each pass (confirmed with an analyzer). Guess what would have happened if one of us had managed to catch them??? Nevermind jail time or fines, what needs to be instilled in the minds of these and potential criminals is that being caught by the police and the FCC would be a picnic compared to being tortured by a modeller whose prized creation has been destroyed by such a prank. Chances are the modeller will get out of jail before the creeps get out of the hospital!
09-08-2010, 12:40 PM
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Greensboro,
PA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
Correctional law enforcement is looking into getting jammers for prisons because of the illegal use of cell phones by inmates. There are 3 state prisons within 20 miles of where I live.
09-08-2010, 02:46 PM
#80
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: HEMICUDA
Correctional law enforcement is looking into getting jammers for prisons because of the illegal use of cell phones by inmates. There are 3 state prisons within 20 miles of where I live.
Correctional law enforcement is looking into getting jammers for prisons because of the illegal use of cell phones by inmates. There are 3 state prisons within 20 miles of where I live.
there are a lot of jammers out in the wild. They are used in schools, halls and some cinemas. As long as the power is reasonable to the effect needed, then why shoujld anyone have aproblem with it?? The jammer law is old and out of date with reality and needs to be brought into the cell phone world. cell phones have their uses but the abuse by ignorant fools abounds and needs to have a reasonable answer.
09-21-2010, 02:41 AM
#82
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: new york, NY
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
Can you imaging that a beautiful painting is actually a cell phone blocker http://www.espow.com/wholesale-security-jammer.html?
09-21-2010, 11:46 AM
#83
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: jikeryma
Can you imaging that a beautiful painting is actually a cell phone blocker http://www.espow.com/wholesale-security-jammer.html?
Can you imaging that a beautiful painting is actually a cell phone blocker http://www.espow.com/wholesale-security-jammer.html?
gotta get me a few of those and give them to people who use their pone far too much
09-21-2010, 08:48 PM
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lewisville,
TX
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: jikeryma
Can you imaging that a beautiful painting is actually a cell phone blocker http://www.espow.com/wholesale-security-jammer.html?
Can you imaging that a beautiful painting is actually a cell phone blocker http://www.espow.com/wholesale-security-jammer.html?
Not only illegal as heck, but ugly too!
No way, no how, no time . . .
- Tim
09-21-2010, 08:57 PM
#85
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norwood,
OH
Posts: 22,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
Stupid question, but would a signal jammer not be a transmitter, too?
Technically the FCC could approve one and call it a "communication device" and all it would be to them is just another transmitter.
Sorry if this came up already, didn't read all 4 pages...us RC car guys have a short attention span
Technically the FCC could approve one and call it a "communication device" and all it would be to them is just another transmitter.
Sorry if this came up already, didn't read all 4 pages...us RC car guys have a short attention span
09-21-2010, 09:01 PM
#86
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: tadawson
Beautiful painting? I've got some paint by number kits that my kid did when about 6 that I am sure that you would love too . . .
Not only illegal as heck, but ugly too!
No way, no how, no time . . .
- Tim
ORIGINAL: jikeryma
Can you imaging that a beautiful painting is actually a cell phone blocker http://www.espow.com/wholesale-security-jammer.html?
Can you imaging that a beautiful painting is actually a cell phone blocker http://www.espow.com/wholesale-security-jammer.html?
Not only illegal as heck, but ugly too!
No way, no how, no time . . .
- Tim
09-21-2010, 09:26 PM
#87
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: ThunderbirdJunkie
Stupid question, but would a signal jammer not be a transmitter, too?
Technically the FCC could approve one and call it a "communication device" and all it would be to them is just another transmitter.
Sorry if this came up already, didn't read all 4 pages...us RC car guys have a short attention span
Stupid question, but would a signal jammer not be a transmitter, too?
Technically the FCC could approve one and call it a "communication device" and all it would be to them is just another transmitter.
Sorry if this came up already, didn't read all 4 pages...us RC car guys have a short attention span
so it will remain illegal BUT the Guvment can do as they please
09-21-2010, 09:30 PM
#88
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norwood,
OH
Posts: 22,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
Right, but if they approved one, it'd still be a transmitter that was FCC approved.
Just thinking out loud.
75mhz never felt so good
Just thinking out loud.
75mhz never felt so good
09-21-2010, 10:03 PM
#89
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: ThunderbirdJunkie
Right, but if they approved one, it'd still be a transmitter that was FCC approved.
Just thinking out loud.
75mhz never felt so good
Right, but if they approved one, it'd still be a transmitter that was FCC approved.
Just thinking out loud.
75mhz never felt so good
75 can be jammed just as easily <grin> but at least cars are not flying too high... mostly
09-22-2010, 01:00 AM
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lewisville,
TX
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
beauty is in the eyes of the beholder...as for illegal? who cares as long as the damn phones and texting get stopped!!
Yeah, the ignorant masses are out of control with the phones, but this isn't the solution . . . businesses and employers simply need to set policies that phones in certain areas are not tolerated, and enforce it with expulsion or disciplinary action.
- Tim
09-22-2010, 09:51 PM
#94
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Norwood,
OH
Posts: 22,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
Yes, because screwing with somebody's cell phone reception on the freeway is destructive behavior.
Did you expect more from a guy that drives toy cars?
Did you expect more from a guy that drives toy cars?
09-22-2010, 10:41 PM
#95
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: ThunderbirdJunkie
Wonder if they make any of these that work from 12v.
Put it in the Jeep. Hilarity will ensue.
Wonder if they make any of these that work from 12v.
Put it in the Jeep. Hilarity will ensue.
just make sure you do not leave it on when you are not running the engine
09-22-2010, 10:42 PM
#96
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: Woketman
WOW!!! What a mature and intelligent individual.....
ORIGINAL: ThunderbirdJunkie
Wonder if they make any of these that work from 12v.
Put it in the Jeep. Hilarity will ensue.
Wonder if they make any of these that work from 12v.
Put it in the Jeep. Hilarity will ensue.
09-22-2010, 10:44 PM
#97
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: tadawson
Who cares? You *should* . . . the fines are pretty severe, and it only takes *one* phone user who figures out what is going on to make a call, and you get an FCC visit . . .
Yeah, the ignorant masses are out of control with the phones, but this isn't the solution . . . businesses and employers simply need to set policies that phones in certain areas are not tolerated, and enforce it with expulsion or disciplinary action.
- Tim
beauty is in the eyes of the beholder...as for illegal? who cares as long as the damn phones and texting get stopped!!
Yeah, the ignorant masses are out of control with the phones, but this isn't the solution . . . businesses and employers simply need to set policies that phones in certain areas are not tolerated, and enforce it with expulsion or disciplinary action.
- Tim
09-22-2010, 10:45 PM
#98
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: ThunderbirdJunkie
75 can be jammed more easily, but it's not as condusive to workplace productivity to jam 75/72/etc
75 can be jammed more easily, but it's not as condusive to workplace productivity to jam 75/72/etc
06-26-2013, 06:23 AM
#99
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LA,
CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
I'm just wondering?
Would it be illegal to jam a unlicensed range link or dragon link FPV flyer or operator. Of course causing a crash that created liability to innocent people would not be without consequences, but it's an interesting question.
The illegal unlicensed person operating the RC system legally is breaking the FCC law and risking a heavy fine for each time it's done. The person jamming is risking a FCC fine for jamming.
But... is it jamming if the person bring jammed is not authorized to operate or transmit in the first place? Taking it one step farther, does the illegal non licensed 433/900 mhz operator risk exposing his illegal operating and power levels to sue in court of involve the FCC?
If both persons are actually involved in a legal action or lawsuit over equipment damage, whom would come out the winner in a court of law or in the FCC eyes?
I was asked this actual question and had no answer.
It is an interesting?
Many flyers are acting like 2.4g is bullet proof and unlike in the past when we could shoot each other down, are losing some of the sportsmanship attitude and just have attitude.
06-26-2013, 06:32 AM
#100
My Feedback: (2)
RE: 2.4 ghz Jammers
ORIGINAL: KB61
I'm just wondering?
I'm just wondering?
Would it be illegal to jam a unlicensed range link or dragon link FPV flyer or operator. Of course causing a crash that created liability to innocent people would not be without consequences, but it's an interesting question.
The illegal unlicensed person operating the RC system legally is breaking the FCC law and risking a heavy fine for each time it's done. The person jamming is risking a FCC fine for jamming.
But... is it jamming if the person bring jammed is not authorized to operate or transmit in the first place? Taking it one step farther, does the illegal non licensed 433/900 mhz operator risk exposing his illegal operating and power levels to sue in court of involve the FCC?
If both persons are actually involved in a legal action or lawsuit over equipment damage, whom would come out the winner in a court of law or in the FCC eyes?
I was asked this actual question and had no answer.
It is an interesting?
Many flyers are acting like 2.4g is bullet proof and unlike in the past when we could shoot each other down, are losing some of the sportsmanship attitude and just have attitude.
There were a couple of years where Ch44 and Ch46 seemed to be targeted and Jamming was suspected, but none were discovered.