Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
#26
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (104)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: nitrohead5300
Yeah I know a guy who has a modified V1RRR with a .21 in it and it has been radared over 100mph. I think this guy is looking for something that is fast out of the box stock.
Yeah I know a guy who has a modified V1RRR with a .21 in it and it has been radared over 100mph. I think this guy is looking for something that is fast out of the box stock.
I just wanted the easy way out to win races!! LOL (but who doesn't?)
#27
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sioux Falls, S.Dakota >_>, SD
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: oneofakindtrini
For one the... I have a 18tz And I cant really take that engine to full WOT. And BTw the 18tz is a small block thats why it doesn't take much for installtion.
ALSo the Hpi On and Off road cars the parts are much more availble compared to basically any brand.
For one the... I have a 18tz And I cant really take that engine to full WOT. And BTw the 18tz is a small block thats why it doesn't take much for installtion.
ALSo the Hpi On and Off road cars the parts are much more availble compared to basically any brand.
Take a brushless converted OFNA DM-ONE. **IVE NEVER SEEN ONE HIT 100*** but this seems like it would be a worthy project. Add in a 1/8 BL and some "high ampage" Lipo's you should be good to go
Other then that something like a high-end model. Xray, Teammagic, Kyosho etc. only thing is these are not always easy to get parts for. And if you want High speeds... you'll need parts.
I keep leaning tords electrics simply being they can be made to be MUCH lighter then nitro's and can produce more power
#29
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (104)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: oneofakindtrini
I keep leaning tords electrics simply being they can be made to be MUCH lighter then nitro's and can produce more power
I keep leaning tords electrics simply being they can be made to be MUCH lighter then nitro's and can produce more power
electric would be cool, the problem with electric cars, when I look at them for some reason they seem as if they are built not as tough as the nitro counter parts!! (wouldn't know for sure never had an electric street car)
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
Nitro cars have more Potential For Fun IMo. IF you want a project... Get a Rs4 2 And Put in a .21 And Set your aim For 100mph.
#32
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sioux Falls, S.Dakota >_>, SD
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: Fudge
I was told the RS4 big block really doesn't help!
any thoughts?
I was told the RS4 big block really doesn't help!
any thoughts?
Im not saying is ISN'T possible but it WOULD be a project. Other wise finding a car that is fast outta the box is simple and maybe cheaper way to go IMO[:-]
#35
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (104)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: oneofakindtrini
Wolf Makes a .21 Conversion Kit. It Also Has a Serpent Tire COnversion.
Wolf Makes a .21 Conversion Kit. It Also Has a Serpent Tire COnversion.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh,
NC
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: iexion
You would either have to mod a chassis to fit a BB engine or find a RS4 BB conversion kit. Then find the tallest gearing ratio possible.
Im not saying is ISN'T possible but it WOULD be a project. Other wise finding a car that is fast outta the box is simple and maybe cheaper way to go IMO[:-]
ORIGINAL: Fudge
I was told the RS4 big block really doesn't help!
any thoughts?
I was told the RS4 big block really doesn't help!
any thoughts?
Im not saying is ISN'T possible but it WOULD be a project. Other wise finding a car that is fast outta the box is simple and maybe cheaper way to go IMO[:-]
Here is my RS4 evo3 with a modded Picco P9R .21. Expect 75mph or so on stock gearing, faster with taller gearing and distance. I hits that speed in a hurry....but the RS4 evo3 is really not built to handle that power in stock form.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh,
NC
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: oneofakindtrini
Nitrorevo.!... My 18tz will run that thing down.
Nitrorevo.!... My 18tz will run that thing down.
ORIGINAL: Fudge
I would really like to see that!!
I would really like to see that!!
#42
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (104)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
hey nitro revo,
have you ran the car yet? or the better question would be have you had the thing speed tested?
Just wondering how close you were to your predictions!!
That last few cars I built, I always though the car would go faster than it actually did by like 5 to 15 mph!!
have you ran the car yet? or the better question would be have you had the thing speed tested?
Just wondering how close you were to your predictions!!
That last few cars I built, I always though the car would go faster than it actually did by like 5 to 15 mph!!
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh,
NC
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: Fudge
hey nitro revo,
have you ran the car yet? or the better question would be have you had the thing speed tested?
Just wondering how close you were to your predictions!!
That last few cars I built, I always though the car would go faster than it actually did by like 5 to 15 mph!!
hey nitro revo,
have you ran the car yet? or the better question would be have you had the thing speed tested?
Just wondering how close you were to your predictions!!
That last few cars I built, I always though the car would go faster than it actually did by like 5 to 15 mph!!
The problem is the stock RS4 drive train can't handle the power for more than a pass or two, so testing got expensive. I was snapping dogbones and axles at 68-70mph in about 150-175ft or so. I added heavy duty steel CVD's but have not tested it yet. My first time on the track for me and the car, it ran 2.4 @ like 56 or 57mph easy in 132' starting off in 2nd gear w/the tallest HPI pinions and spurs during test-n-tune. It could run 2.2's or better @60mph or so w/a little work.
#44
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (104)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
NICE
I think I may actually build one of these then instead of just buying one!! But I have to finish my crawler project first (cause once you get too many projects going NOTHING gets done)!!
I think I may actually build one of these then instead of just buying one!! But I have to finish my crawler project first (cause once you get too many projects going NOTHING gets done)!!
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Elbridge,
NY
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
i got my rs4 3 evo+ today and i love the car. when i was at the hobby shop he opend the box to te 4-tec and i just didnt like how it looked. to me it looked like cheap plastic and he was telling me there are not alot of hopups for it compared to the rs4. either way i was gettign the rs4 i just wanted to see the 4tec for myself. im happy with my purchase.
#46
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (104)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
you are right the RS4 has more hop ups!!
But I think the 4-Tec can handle the speed a little better, and (at least from my point of view) seems to be built to better take the power!!
But I think the 4-Tec can handle the speed a little better, and (at least from my point of view) seems to be built to better take the power!!
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh,
NC
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
ORIGINAL: Fudge
you are right the RS4 has more hop ups!!
But I think the 4-Tec can handle the speed a little better, and (at least from my point of view) seems to be built to better take the power!!
you are right the RS4 has more hop ups!!
But I think the 4-Tec can handle the speed a little better, and (at least from my point of view) seems to be built to better take the power!!
#48
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (104)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
I know the .21 is a big block!!
But I heard that the belt drive cars, give a little on starts, and the belts absord some of the torque, giving you more controlled launches!, while shaft drive cars do not! (wouldn't you want that for a 100 mph car? so it's semi controllable?)
But I heard that the belt drive cars, give a little on starts, and the belts absord some of the torque, giving you more controlled launches!, while shaft drive cars do not! (wouldn't you want that for a 100 mph car? so it's semi controllable?)
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
NitroRevo Exactly what are you saying that I have to come from behind? That doesn't even make sense... Not to mention you have a rs4 3 EVO.... Lamborghini? Screw Lamborghini... I Have to go but... I'll be back on tonight to show pics of my Subie.
#50
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (104)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Fatsest Car out of the box!!!
Well a lambo will beat a subie!! (unless the subie has major work done to it)
But hey have you had your car clocked to see how fast it is?
Also to everyone in general, would making the car rear wheel drive, make it faster?
I was thinking that should have less rotational resistance, and be a few grams lighter!
But hey have you had your car clocked to see how fast it is?
Also to everyone in general, would making the car rear wheel drive, make it faster?
I was thinking that should have less rotational resistance, and be a few grams lighter!