which cub??
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sarasota,
FL
im lookin' at Sig 1/4 cub and balsa usa 1/4 cub
which builds easier? which has better ground handling? or isnt this gonna matter
and any other differences?
thanks
which builds easier? which has better ground handling? or isnt this gonna matter
and any other differences?
thanks
#2
I cant say much about the Balsa USA kit , I havent built one .
I have built a few Sig 1/4 cub kits . They build fairly straight forward w alot of cutting out small parts from stamped sheet balsa (not too bad..)
Both planes do fly very similarly , If your going for scale looks I would go with the Sig kit (just my opinion...)
I have built a few Sig 1/4 cub kits . They build fairly straight forward w alot of cutting out small parts from stamped sheet balsa (not too bad..)
Both planes do fly very similarly , If your going for scale looks I would go with the Sig kit (just my opinion...)
#3

My Feedback: (2)
Both fly great!
Ground handling is not an issue with either because of the long wheelbase (54" )
Both require a lot of gluing sticks to other sticks
Neither are particularly scale. The BUSA Fuse is 1/4" wider than the Sig
Sig can be built with one or two piece wing. The BUSA can only be built as a 2 piece wing
The BUSA cub has a scale door/window, so a believeable cockpit can be built, if desired
This is a pic of a scaled out Balsa USA cub

...and this is a pic of a scaled out Sig Cub
Ground handling is not an issue with either because of the long wheelbase (54" )
Both require a lot of gluing sticks to other sticks
Neither are particularly scale. The BUSA Fuse is 1/4" wider than the Sig
Sig can be built with one or two piece wing. The BUSA can only be built as a 2 piece wing
The BUSA cub has a scale door/window, so a believeable cockpit can be built, if desired
This is a pic of a scaled out Balsa USA cub

...and this is a pic of a scaled out Sig Cub
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Potomac, MD
Fact is.... both kits are mostly lots of sticks. They are both quality kits that will produce a good looking semi-scale Cub that flies great in a scale manner. The BUSA is a bit less expensive. Both offer plenty of opportunity for minor modifications to add as much/little scale features it requires to please you. Look at both and decide which stock features you like the most and how much additional work each will require to achieve whatever scale features you want most. I have the 1/4 BUSA Cub built mostly per plans with STITS lite covering, tapes, fake stitching and paints with a G23 up front. Not exactly scale... but it looks pretty good from 10' as well as in the air! Good luck!
NONY.... that is one fine looking Cub with floats!
NONY.... that is one fine looking Cub with floats!
#6
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mountain City,
TX
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (219)
I have built both. The Sig kit is far superior in my opinion. There is more cutting of parts in the Sig kit. The thicker balsa parts (3/8" +) are printed, not die or laser cut. The Balsa USA is all laminated 1/8"material (lite ply and balsa).
The die cutting is poor and laminating is a pain. The Sig is a 5/16 frame, Balsa USA 1/4". The Sig fram is much stronger.
The die cutting is poor and laminating is a pain. The Sig is a 5/16 frame, Balsa USA 1/4". The Sig fram is much stronger.




