Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Scale Aircraft
 C A P  Dauntless >

C A P Dauntless

Community
Search
Notices
RC Scale Aircraft Discuss rc scale aircraft here (for giant scale see category above)

C A P Dauntless

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2007 | 08:07 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: westbrook, ME
Default C A P Dauntless

I got some plans and have begun to cut the parts for this beast, has anyone built one?

thanks RCU
Old 11-02-2007 | 10:45 AM
  #2  
EF
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default RE: C A P Dauntless

I plan to. Have the plans, cowl, canopy, and a laser cut kit.
I've read it's a good flyer but may benefit from some weight reduction.
Old 11-02-2007 | 03:55 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,094
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: westbrook, ME
Default RE: C A P Dauntless

EF, take a good look at the plans , there is a contradiction from the side fuse view , to the top fuse view, their different. the plans also show a 40 size engine in it . The one ken walters
flew in england , was powered by a .90 , he must have moved the fire wall back or something
because the drive washer ends way up in front of the cowl , in the position on the plans.

once i figure out the deviation in the plans , i intend to try a .90 . but its going to need some type of surgery . I dont think it will balance with a .90 , even though i intend to lighten it some,
i'll try it . CG to the nose end is very short on this aircraft. THERE was an RCU THREAD A while back where a builder stated , that his final weight was 14 lbs , tried flying it with an even longer 1.08 and couldn't even get it to rotate .

one of the things i dont understand is why their showing 3/16 thick formers in the rear fuse
and also the wing center section, this can be lightened

Old 11-03-2007 | 04:37 AM
  #4  
EF
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 564
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default RE: C A P Dauntless

Yes, there seems to be a contradiction indeed. Will have to check against drawings of the real one to determine which is the correct view!

The firewall needs to be repositioned but seems it can easily be done.

A build article in RCSI mentions 12.25 Lb and a 90 two stroke and no problem balancing, but he changed the rear fuse from 3/32 to 1/16 planking.

Lots of potential for lightening certainly. It's an old design, but a good basis for improvement.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.