Community
Search
Notices
RC Tanks Discuss all aspects of rc tank building and driving here!

Weight Distribution and

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2018 | 04:58 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Weight Distribution and

Hey peoples I'm new, not just to the forum but to rc tanks! But not to RCs. but man the closest thing I've ever seen to my tank (Henglong M41) is maybe the "BLizzard" snow cat looking RC that my friend has. I understand the basics of what controlling two motors at once is all about but have no experience with those specialty escs or any kind of mixing with traditional escs, and on top of that the tank has a board which is alittle different and has a lot more pins and wires than I'm used to.


So on the Henglong I've driven it around and I really.. well I was really disappointed it the performance, I'm into scale crawling and my tank does the opposite of what I'd like it to do.
On flat smooth ground trying to start up slowly the motors are already stalled out lol. If I slowly move the stick forward it will eventually lurch forward and then its mostly fine. The controller wins worst quality of any of my RCs.

It does have metal tracks and wheels so maybe that's why the small stock motors are having trouble. they are not too tight.

Ive ordered a V2 taigen gearbox which will come with 390 size motors but beyond that, is there anything else than can help make it move more realisticly? The shorter gear ratio and stronger motors will help but I was just wondering how big is the next step to a better controller and throttle resolution?

Oh and the tank is very rear weight biased.. Do any of you add weight to the front to make it drive better?

Last edited by RCEnduro; 10-17-2018 at 05:10 PM.
Old 10-17-2018 | 07:47 PM
  #2  
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 944
Received 285 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

You are on the right path with the new gearbox and motors. But the M41 stock track type, metal or plastic are horrible for grip and slide/break traction to easily. You will need to change over to either M26 Pershing tracks and sprockets or for the best performance DKLM Abrams metal/rubber padded tracks and metal Abrams sprockets. Fortunately the M41 is super easy to do this with as changing just the sprockets and adjusting the new tracks lengths are all that is really needed in your case.

Also consider running an 8.4v or 9.6v battery. These will make the motors perform better both for crawling and sprinting. I have done a few write ups on the M41 so check them out. Especially the one where I did the track conversion to run Abrams metal/rubber padded track.

Lastly adding wieght helps the suspension flex and conform better to terrain features. This helps with climbing grip but does not really help with throttle control. I add a fair amount of wieght to all my tanks to give them a 50/50 front to back balance. With the M41 though I find that a 60/40 front to back is best as the wheel base is so short and needs just a bit more forward to keep from flipping over while climbing steep inclines or step type obstacles.

With the new gearbox, motors, track with more grip and higher volt batteries you should be able to achieve decent control from the newer generation of HL controllers. I have no problems with them and I actually “rock crawl” my M41s (as shown in my gallery and past thread photos).

Here are few of my M41s. The front green M41 is running M26 Pershing tracks and sprockets the tan M41 is running DKLM Abrams metal/rubber padded tracks with metal sprockets. The far background M41 is running stock "metal" M41 tracks/sprockets. All of these tanks run 390 motors, 9.6v batteries and 3:1 steel gearboxes. They are fast (scale top end of 45mph) but can also perform slow crawling maneuvers when the terrain calls for it. Though the tan M41 completely outclasses the other two in all around handling due to the superior grip of its track. All still run the newer HL "5.3" 2.4G system.

Heng Long M41s "modernized"

Heng Long M41 with stock metal tracks and sprocket.



Last edited by Fsttanks; 10-17-2018 at 09:23 PM.
Old 10-18-2018 | 04:30 AM
  #3  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,678
Received 319 Likes on 263 Posts
From: Detroit Rock City
Default

First, the stock taigen V3 control unit will give you much better control than the Heng long unit and it's a cheap option. However, your best bet is to go with a hobby grade board like a Clark or an IBU. The difference in control is just amazing. The Walker Bulldog is, in my opinion, a really nice little tank that gets overlooked by quite a few. When I get home from work I'll post a couple videos of mine because I've done something unique with it. My m41 has two different Hull tops. One is stock and has a regular tank turret, and the other is one that I converted over to a quad 50 anti-aircraft tank. The tank runs with TG ball bearing gearboxes, 380 Motors, with metal tracks and sprockets and with the Clark tk20 it really, really runs great. If you want to maintain accuracy, you don't want to change your tracks. I know the other tracks can grip better but they are historically inaccurate and that's why I stuck with the stock m41 tracks in metal.
Old 10-18-2018 | 04:59 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok cool. So I didn't expect to be able to use a higher voltage battery, that should totally help. Add some weight to balance it out.. that will be (hopefully) an easy task.

I'd love to get my M41 to the point that I can make an Tank vs. Rock crawler video.. of course at the end the tank shoots the truck and blows it up haha.

I wish you said the stock tracks work better because I paid the extra money for metal tracks and then painted them and everything, but I probably need the driving experience first anyway before I can take advantage of a grippy abrams track.

I'll check out your build thread for sure.
Old 10-18-2018 | 05:19 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crius
First, the stock taigen V3 control unit will give you much better control than the Heng long unit and it's a cheap option. However, your best bet is to go with a hobby grade board like a Clark or an IBU. The difference in control is just amazing. The Walker Bulldog is, in my opinion, a really nice little tank that gets overlooked by quite a few. When I get home from work I'll post a couple videos of mine because I've done something unique with it. My m41 has two different Hull tops. One is stock and has a regular tank turret, and the other is one that I converted over to a quad 50 anti-aircraft tank. The tank runs with TG ball bearing gearboxes, 380 Motors, with metal tracks and sprockets and with the Clark tk20 it really, really runs great. If you want to maintain accuracy, you don't want to change your tracks. I know the other tracks can grip better but they are historically inaccurate and that's why I stuck with the stock m41 tracks in metal.
Thanks for the info. on the other control units/boards! I didn't realize the Taigen's had a unique control unit compared to the Heng Longs. After I get some experience with the stock controls and upgraded gearbox/motors I'm sure I will start looking towards this.

When I was looking at tanks for some reason I gravitated towards the M41! It just seemed so random amongst the many WWII tanks and I'm always a fan of the underdog

Last edited by RCEnduro; 10-18-2018 at 05:24 AM.
Old 10-18-2018 | 05:26 AM
  #6  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,678
Received 319 Likes on 263 Posts
From: Detroit Rock City
Default

I understand completely, and I'm a big fan of the Bulldog myself. One of these days I'll get around to building one of the Bulldogs from the movie Apocalypse Now. One thing you should keep in mind is that the HL Bulldog is not true 1/16 scale. It's actually closer to 1/14 scale so to make it completely accurate you would have to narrow the tracks and lower the hull and a whole bunch of work that I just don't think is worth it. It's a sweet-looking and sweet running tank just the way it is and it's always good to see another Bulldog fan show up on the Forum.
Old 10-19-2018 | 03:00 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok so I'm too new to post URLs or pictures of my tank I guess .. but I can tell you that if you search " M 41 English" on youtube you will find this old VHS copy of some upfitting program video from the era, and it starts off slow with just some guy talking but then it has the most awesome footage of M41s driving I've seen yet.
Old 10-20-2018 | 10:40 AM
  #8  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,678
Received 319 Likes on 263 Posts
From: Detroit Rock City
Default

So here's my M41 with a Clark TK22 and the stock hull top.


And here with the AA top.

Old 10-21-2018 | 04:16 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It does seem like a good combination with the Tk22! The AA version is really trick, the smoker unit works really well.
Did you actually time it with the engine start or does the TK22 bind it together? And your headlights work remotely too wow.

Last edited by RCEnduro; 10-21-2018 at 04:21 AM.
Old 10-21-2018 | 08:22 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok so I've opened up the M41 for the first time and started making some changes.

First I removed the non-functioning heng long smoker unit. I just never got it to work, although it was moving air no smoke.

I want to move the speaker to in between the new taigen gearboxes, but they are still in the mail so I can't tell if it will fit. But it does appear to fit with the stock gearbox. Also now the wires are too short to reach from the speaker in the rear back to the board.

The layout and compact size of the RX18 is pretty sweet, and the wire management was surprisingly adequate (although I'm not a fan of twisted wires) I even saw a few mini cable ties in there. The overall build quality and connector fitment etc.on the board is really bad. Mine was not even closed all the way and I just barely got the plastic to snap together. It's a few steps back from the waterproof, and sealed escs that are available in other RCs.

So the reason why I want to move the speaker between the gearbox is to add some weight to the front, which I did in the source of a large square aluminum block I was using as a paper weight. I think its just the right weight, if it was steel it would probably be too heavy! After checking to make sure the upper hull would still fit and snapping off some plastic bits on the bottom to make it fit better I used gorilla glue to secure it. I didn't want to use double sided tape because it would have made it taller and possible interfere with fitment.

The motors are really small, if they didn't have that gear reduction they would be toast!

I took a picture but I don't think I can post them cause I have like 4 posts lol

Last edited by RCEnduro; 10-21-2018 at 08:34 AM.
Old 10-21-2018 | 10:54 AM
  #11  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,678
Received 319 Likes on 263 Posts
From: Detroit Rock City
Default

If you run with the speaker between the GBs you won't be able to use a smoker, and I believe you liked the effect on mine so do you really want to give that up? I just use a stock Taigen smoker from Imex in Florida and they're only ten bucks a pop. For a long time I would automatically have Erik add two smoke units and two airsoft units (also ten bucks) to every order I placed. I found out early that smokers and airsoft units are prone to failure (even though they've gotten more dependable as time goes by) but they're cheap and easy to swap out so I guess I've just gotten used to it.

I understand about the weight in the front but I don't think aluminum is the best material for that, being light weight to start with. I just use simple lead sinkers from the fishing tackle box. I hold them in with Zap Goo and they come in all different shapes and sizes. Usually the split shot, about a quarter inch in diameter, work very well. You can tuck them into nooks and crannies so you don't waste space, and I just weigh out a handful on my postal scale to get a starting point.

You might want to look into a better control system. The hobby grade boards, like the IBU and the TK22 like the one in mine are a popular choice, and there's also the Asp and the Elmod. The TK22 is by far the most economical at about $100 including shipping from RC Tanks of OKC. That's Nathan's outfit and he's a good guy and an avid RC tanker himself. It does have it's drawbacks, though, as you need a special TV remote and an IR programming device to set it up, but once you have those things they work for any subsequent Clark products you buy. When I first started out I was buying HL tanks with the old 27 MHz set-ups and the control was horrible, so I found a cheap way to get better control was to install a Taigen MFU. Now they're up to the V3 control board (also called an MFU, for Multi-Function Unit) and I think it's a very good, low cost option for airsoft tanks. It's around $60 and works with any hobby grade transmitter, like my favorite tank TX, the FlySky i6. I have some videos of this set-up if you'd like to see them. The new V3 MFUs have proportional turret rotation speeds, very good sounds (although they haven't come out with a Bulldog sound module yet) and a feature to disable that horribly fake track recoil when you fire the main gun.

Where are you located? I think it's great to see guys from other areas of RC coming over to tanks so I try to do whatever I can to help them out. If you need parts you're welcome to raid my spares box for whatever I can provide, and I'll try to help out with whatever else you need. That don't mean we'll be takin' warm showers together or anything like that, but I do try to be as accommodating as possible with guys like you, just to make sure your experience is a good one and you stay in the hobby. The more you spend, the better chance they'll finally come out with my favorite TD, the Hellcat! So it's not like I don't have ulterior motives, but in this case they're to the benefit of new RC Tankers. So just shout if you need anything, and I'm looking forward to photos once you have enough posts (I always thought that was a dumb rule, but I don't run things around here. In fact, the only thing I run around here is my mouth. ).

You might also want to take a look at this thread.

https://www.rctankwarfare.co.uk/foru...p?f=22&t=26093

Louis has just gone whole hog on this puppy and he's replaced the too wide stock tracks with a pair of the proper width, narrowed the sprockets and idlers, corrected all the errors in the tank that HL let slide, and really gone crazy with detail. This is one of the finest Bulldogs I've ever seen, and Louis never ceases to amaze me with his skill and attention to detail.
Old 10-21-2018 | 02:11 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 944
Received 285 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RCEnduro
Ok so I've opened up the M41 for the first time and started making some changes.

First I removed the non-functioning heng long smoker unit. I just never got it to work, although it was moving air no smoke.

I want to move the speaker to in between the new taigen gearboxes, but they are still in the mail so I can't tell if it will fit. But it does appear to fit with the stock gearbox. Also now the wires are too short to reach from the speaker in the rear back to the board.

The layout and compact size of the RX18 is pretty sweet, and the wire management was surprisingly adequate (although I'm not a fan of twisted wires) I even saw a few mini cable ties in there. The overall build quality and connector fitment etc.on the board is really bad. Mine was not even closed all the way and I just barely got the plastic to snap together. It's a few steps back from the waterproof, and sealed escs that are available in other RCs.

So the reason why I want to move the speaker between the gearbox is to add some weight to the front, which I did in the source of a large square aluminum block I was using as a paper weight. I think its just the right weight, if it was steel it would probably be too heavy! After checking to make sure the upper hull would still fit and snapping off some plastic bits on the bottom to make it fit better I used gorilla glue to secure it. I didn't want to use double sided tape because it would have made it taller and possible interfere with fitment.

The motors are really small, if they didn't have that gear reduction they would be toast!

I took a picture but I don't think I can post them cause I have like 4 posts lol
Yes the speaker will fit just fine between the gearboxes even with the 390 motors. I put all mine between the boxes. No need for the "unrealistic" and "toy like" smoke units, but then thats just my opinion. I have seen some excellent realistic looking builds ruined by the look of white smoke puffs as exhaust.

Consider also removing (cutting out) the battery box. This adds a lot of space for larger batteries, adding weight and moving around/changing electronics as your build evolves. The M41 is a short tank and even with the battery box removed it is still quite structurally sturdy.
Old 10-22-2018 | 09:19 AM
  #13  
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 723
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I wondered about the correct amount of smoke, but if you look at the YouTube videos of restored tanks running around you can see that some do indeed produce a lot of smoke! Maybe they are just bad restorations and the engine needs work. The Tiger 131 doesn't seem to smoke much.

Steve
Old 10-22-2018 | 09:36 AM
  #14  
RichJohnson's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,891
Received 425 Likes on 262 Posts
From: San Diego
Default

You might have a problem fitting the henglong sprocket on the taigen gear boxes, their shaft size is a bit larger. Dont know why they did that.
also, if you go after market control board beware right now the IBU2U has an inirtia delay built in. You cant turn it off. Eventually they will likely create an option to turn it off but its not available right now. Makes the tank horrible to drive in my opinion amd impossible to use in an IR battle.
Old 10-22-2018 | 10:13 AM
  #15  
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 723
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I have not tested this, but the parameter inertiainit can be set = 0 to turn it off on startup. Also, it can be turned on and off with the transmitter:

The inertia (momentum) can be enabled automatically at startup by setting the appropriate value,
also it can be turned on or off by transmitter.

For Base version only one curve is available
For Full Option version there’s up to 6 different pre-loaded curves, you can set the desired one by
setting the related value
InertiaInit=0
Set inertia status at tank power on 0=Inertia OFF, 1=Inertia ON (at start up)
InertiaType=1
Set the desired inertia curve


I like the inertia. When you just let off the throttle, the tank slowly comes to a stop. If you want an abrupt stop, reverse stick. This engages the "brakes" and the tank stops immediately and the brake lights come on.

Steve
Old 10-22-2018 | 10:38 AM
  #16  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,678
Received 319 Likes on 263 Posts
From: Detroit Rock City
Default

Originally Posted by maillemaker
I wondered about the correct amount of smoke, but if you look at the YouTube videos of restored tanks running around you can see that some do indeed produce a lot of smoke! Maybe they are just bad restorations and the engine needs work. The Tiger 131 doesn't seem to smoke much.

Steve
Smoke is pretty much a matter of personal preference. Some guys like it and some guys don't. Personally, I like a small amount of smoke just because I think it's a good effect but there are quite a few tanks that don't really produce any smoke at all. Like I said, it all depends on what you like. If you like the smoker, use it, if you don't like it, don't.
Old 10-22-2018 | 11:01 AM
  #17  
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 944
Received 285 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RichJohnson
You might have a problem fitting the henglong sprocket on the taigen gear boxes, their shaft size is a bit larger. Dont know why they did that.
also, if you go after market control board beware right now the IBU2U has an inirtia delay built in. You cant turn it off. Eventually they will likely create an option to turn it off but its not available right now. Makes the tank horrible to drive in my opinion amd impossible to use in an IR battle.
Rich brought up an often overlooked point about the Taigen gearbox drive output axles. They have to be fitted to HL M41 sprockets (and other HL sprockets). A easy way to do this is to install them, then run them while holding a “sanding implement” to the first ~2/3rds of the axle checking routinely the fit of the sprockets onto the axle shafts. It does not take long, is easy enough and will save a lot of grumbling.

I do it this EASY way now, after it was point out to me by Rich.
Old 10-22-2018 | 11:27 AM
  #18  
RichJohnson's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,891
Received 425 Likes on 262 Posts
From: San Diego
Default

Yeah, you can read how i did it durimg my m60a3 build.

The IBU2 Ultimate has a permantly set minimum inirtia. Setting it to 0 does nothing. I even set the point to disable it, its still there. Try it you will se what I mean. It makes the tank very hard to control and navigate around obsticals and impossible to use for IR battle. And the reversing system of slowly lowering the stick to get it to back up is so terrible I cannot get my tank to back up without several tries. It just down right sucks for my use. I love IBU, i have 10 tanks set up with older IBUs but the new one got too advanced and left me behind. I have had discussions with RCTE and the MFR about this issue and they confirmed i am correct but most people want the inirtian, well my friends and i that IR battle cant use it. So they are working on some new firmware to update it and remove the basic inirtia setting and make it work like an old ibu2. Until then i wont buy any more. I do not like clark boars for my own continuty of operations and cannot stand the lag recoil of tamiya systems so until the new firmware is updated i will have to retire a tank to put a new one into operation. I wont use the ultimate.
i know i sound like an ass, but im a good customer and they changed a product to where i cant use it so im a bit upset and eagerly waiting the firmware update.
Old 10-22-2018 | 12:17 PM
  #19  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,678
Received 319 Likes on 263 Posts
From: Detroit Rock City
Default

I'm with ya, Rich, I can't stand the inertia feature either, and I have no idea where they got the part about most people wanting it. Almost all of the guys that I know and have talked to have said they don't want inertia and even if they do want it they definitely want the option of turning it off. For close-quarters driving like you find in an IR battle an inertia feature is a definite drawback.

It might be because most of my gear boxes are older, but I've never had any trouble with the diameter of the TG shafts and the HL sprockets, it's the flat. I just take a diamond file and file down the flat a little bit and then the sprocket fits right on. That may have changed since the last time I did it.
Old 10-26-2018 | 04:58 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fsttanks


Rich brought up an often overlooked point about the Taigen gearbox drive output axles. They have to be fitted to HL M41 sprockets (and other HL sprockets). A easy way to do this is to install them, then run them while holding a “sanding implement” to the first ~2/3rds of the axle checking routinely the fit of the sprockets onto the axle shafts. It does not take long, is easy enough and will save a lot of grumbling.

I do it this EASY way now, after it was point out to me by Rich.
Thanks a lot I really appreciate the heads up. I finally have time today to work all this out. Super impressed with the taigengearbox, and it came in a really nice box. I guess I ordered it with both the smaller motors installed and then the 390s in a separate bag.

I almost got depressed when I saw the position of the lower motor screws but they did leave some access holes on the opposite side of the gearbox.

I'll try and install it first and when I run into the problem you mentioned I'll see if I understand what you meant loll

Last edited by RCEnduro; 10-26-2018 at 05:01 AM.
Old 10-26-2018 | 08:58 AM
  #21  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok I see the problem, I need to make the sprocket side a bit bigger without messing up the shape of the key hole.

Also as luck would have it the leads on the larger motors are too short.. But the leads on the smaller motors ARE long enough. So, I bet if I just tap it with a soldering iron it will come off and I can switch them. The larger motors have what I think are little resistors that combine the +/- in series with the can itself. or maybe its some other way i'm pretty tired atm. they say 104, 10.4kohm? i'm studying this stuff for work/school so I only just know what I'm looking at but not much experience

Last edited by RCEnduro; 10-26-2018 at 09:17 AM.
Old 10-26-2018 | 09:04 AM
  #22  
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 723
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

And the reversing system of slowly lowering the stick to get it to back up is so terrible I cannot get my tank to back up without several tries.
One of the things I dislike about the IBU2 is it seems like you have to wait a couple of seconds before each "command". So if you try to fire the gun twice rapidly, for example, the second time nothing happens. You have to wait a bit and then fire the gun. I find other motions have the same "lag", too. Maybe that is what you are talking about with the backup.

I love the inertia. I like how the tank slowly comes to a stop when you take your foot off the gas but don't press the brakes.

Steve
Old 10-26-2018 | 09:51 AM
  #23  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,678
Received 319 Likes on 263 Posts
From: Detroit Rock City
Default

Originally Posted by RCEnduro
Ok I see the problem, I need to make the sprocket side a bit bigger without messing up the shape of the key hole.

Also as luck would have it the leads on the larger motors are too short.. But the leads on the smaller motors ARE long enough. So, I bet if I just tap it with a soldering iron it will come off and I can switch them. The larger motors have what I think are little resistors that combine the +/- in series with the can itself. or maybe its some other way i'm pretty tired atm. they say 104, 10.4kohm? i'm studying this stuff for work/school so I only just know what I'm looking at but not much experience
Those are capacitors, and they're on there to prevent electromagnetic interference with the receiver. The 104 means 104 microfarads.
Old 10-26-2018 | 10:46 AM
  #24  
RichJohnson's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,891
Received 425 Likes on 262 Posts
From: San Diego
Default

Do not try to open up the holes on the slrockets, just run the motors in the tank and lay a file on the end of the drive shaft amd file it while it spins and keep checking to see if the sproket fits yet.
Old 10-26-2018 | 11:54 AM
  #25  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crius
Those are capacitors, and they're on there to prevent electromagnetic interference with the receiver. The 104 means 104 microfarads.
ah cool. thanks


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.