CMP/GSP Spitfire
#127
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bournemouth, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
I flew mine yesterday! 1.08 and 14x8 really moved this thing! Not at all slow! I turned it over half way through to a British F3A flyer. who really showed it off to its full! Unfortunately, that part of the flight was not videoed. A 2min video of takeoff, some flybys and nearly the landing will be online soon. Unfortunately, because the mounting blocks had previously been broken by original owner, they did not have the (repaired) strength to withstand the landing (even though it was smooth) I now have to take back the skin and covering and see what I can do to re enforce this, and stop any further retract bay problems (any ideas??)
Overall, amazing flying model.....attracted lots of attention and Jon commented on how well it flew and felt.
Cheers for now
Dave
Overall, amazing flying model.....attracted lots of attention and Jon commented on how well it flew and felt.
Cheers for now
Dave
#128
My Feedback: (15)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Iowa City, Iowa (again!)
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Congratulations on your flight, Dave, and hopefully your repairs will not take too long to complete.
Out of curiosity, where is your CG? 120 mm, 125 mm, 130 mm?
Anyone else out there struggling with this plane's tendency to porpoise on landing? Edwin, I know your's is set at 4 7/8, but what about the rest of you flying this plane? I have been experimenting with mine lately, and it seems as though if I'm too far from ideal... the plane becomes unwieldy.
Let me know, and thanks in advance.
Noah
Out of curiosity, where is your CG? 120 mm, 125 mm, 130 mm?
Anyone else out there struggling with this plane's tendency to porpoise on landing? Edwin, I know your's is set at 4 7/8, but what about the rest of you flying this plane? I have been experimenting with mine lately, and it seems as though if I'm too far from ideal... the plane becomes unwieldy.
Let me know, and thanks in advance.
Noah
#129
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bournemouth, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
I believe my cg is at 135mm. When it landed, it seemed that it would have settle onto the tail with only minor up elevator needed.. however i cannot be sure, due to the retract mount failure induced spin.
I'd like to hear what others have found optimum cg to be.....the cg I have ensures great flying characteristics.....ground is ok ish......
I'd like to hear what others have found optimum cg to be.....the cg I have ensures great flying characteristics.....ground is ok ish......
#130
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Livermore,
CA
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Mine is at 122/123mm. Anything further back and mine becomes difficult to handle at slow speeds, especially during landing when the tank doesn't have much fuel in it.
Travis
Travis
#132
My Feedback: (15)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Iowa City, Iowa (again!)
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Thanks for the replies, gents.
I was at ~122 mm to start. It tended to floated a little so I moved it up to 118 mm. It was OK there, but it seemed as though it became too nose-heavy... When I would come in the plane wanted to sink really fast and the elevator would be a bit unresponsive. So, I'd feed in more up, but then it seemed as though I would all of a sudden hit some critical elevator point and the plane would rise dramatically. I have since moved it back to 125 mm and now the plane won't settle in very well... it wants to float forever. So much so that I have to force it down. Every third or so attempt at landing it floats and floats and then slows to the point where I fear a stall so have to go around again. I'm just really surprised that those little (2-4 mm) changes translate into such huge differences in flight characteristics.
I need to keep experimenting, I suppose. I really need to figure this out because I absolutely love the way the plane flys. I just wish it were more predictable when landing.
Thanks again for the input.
Noah
I was at ~122 mm to start. It tended to floated a little so I moved it up to 118 mm. It was OK there, but it seemed as though it became too nose-heavy... When I would come in the plane wanted to sink really fast and the elevator would be a bit unresponsive. So, I'd feed in more up, but then it seemed as though I would all of a sudden hit some critical elevator point and the plane would rise dramatically. I have since moved it back to 125 mm and now the plane won't settle in very well... it wants to float forever. So much so that I have to force it down. Every third or so attempt at landing it floats and floats and then slows to the point where I fear a stall so have to go around again. I'm just really surprised that those little (2-4 mm) changes translate into such huge differences in flight characteristics.
I need to keep experimenting, I suppose. I really need to figure this out because I absolutely love the way the plane flys. I just wish it were more predictable when landing.
Thanks again for the input.
Noah
#134
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bournemouth, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
I've documented the retract re-enforcement incase any of you (heaven forbid) find yourself in the same situation where your retract mounting blocks decide to give up. [link=http://www.wimbornemac.org/Pages/Forum/display_topic_threads.asp?ForumID=8&TopicID=9]WMAC>FORUM>SCALE>SPITFIRE[/link]
cheers for now,
Dave
cheers for now,
Dave
#135
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bkara, MALTA
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
SJN - you have not yet told us if the German retracts are good ? unless I missed your posts and PETE sorry for more questions is you ASP 120 inverted ? if yes did you think about putting it sideways ?
best regards
Joe
best regards
Joe
#136
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WaterloovilleHampshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Hi Joe,
Yes my ASP120 is indeed inverted, as I'd rather have the head sticking out the bottom of the cowl than the side. Having said that, without a remote glow it's a bugger to find the plug with the glow starter while grovelling around on your hands and knees. The next time the cowl is off I'll fit one I think.
The attached picture shows it just built without the oleos and befor I put a head protecting skid on the rocker cover.
Yes my ASP120 is indeed inverted, as I'd rather have the head sticking out the bottom of the cowl than the side. Having said that, without a remote glow it's a bugger to find the plug with the glow starter while grovelling around on your hands and knees. The next time the cowl is off I'll fit one I think.
The attached picture shows it just built without the oleos and befor I put a head protecting skid on the rocker cover.
#137
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bkara, MALTA
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Pete looks good - I was planning to put on an on-board glow as I am so concerned with inverted engines. What is that hole top ( right ) on cowl for ? I see you are using two switches so you have gone for two sets of batteries ?
Joe
Joe
#138
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WaterloovilleHampshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Joe,
There are two hole on the top of the cowl, but on this particular photo I have only plugged one of them. They were simply to allow access for an allen key to tighten the two extension wires (choke and main needle) that come out the side.
I have mechanicalo retracts so yes, I thought it wise to have separate batteries. 2000mah main and 1400mah for the retracts. Maybe a bit OTT but better safe than sorry. You only want a less than perfect landing to bend a U/C leg that subsequently doesn't retract properly and drain your only battery - then your up sh*t creek without a paddle!!
There are two hole on the top of the cowl, but on this particular photo I have only plugged one of them. They were simply to allow access for an allen key to tighten the two extension wires (choke and main needle) that come out the side.
I have mechanicalo retracts so yes, I thought it wise to have separate batteries. 2000mah main and 1400mah for the retracts. Maybe a bit OTT but better safe than sorry. You only want a less than perfect landing to bend a U/C leg that subsequently doesn't retract properly and drain your only battery - then your up sh*t creek without a paddle!!
#139
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bournemouth, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
[link=http://www.wimbornemac.org/Pages/Forum/display_topic_threads.asp?ForumID=8&TopicID=9]Video of the maiden flight of mine is now up.[/link]
#140
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bkara, MALTA
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Well we don't want to be up the sh*t creek without a paddle but you are right and I will do the same, as originaly I was thinking of large batteries for both but if stuck they would drain....
thanks for you help Pete.
thanks for you help Pete.
#142
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bournemouth, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Hi Pete,
Thanks....I get a lot of satisfaction from weathering a model, just finishes it off and it really aint that hard to do (I've got a Hurricane to do next, for a mate)....feel some good formation flights coming on!
Gear doors are the next point of call.
Thanks....I get a lot of satisfaction from weathering a model, just finishes it off and it really aint that hard to do (I've got a Hurricane to do next, for a mate)....feel some good formation flights coming on!
Gear doors are the next point of call.
#146
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bournemouth, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
6b pencil. Basically colouring in the panel lines and rivet detail, then smudge the pencil with your finger in the direction of the airflow. The wing is slightly trickier. Rub pencil patches onto random places (l/e is best) then add a drop of 3in1 oil to the patch and mix it up, then drag the mixture backwards (airflow) then rub the oil and pencil mix from l/e to t/e with a cloth, 'pulling' them pencil/oil as you go. This I found gave the best effect. Also, if you bugger it up, the pencil should rub out! (emphasis on the 'should' ) I also decided not to clear coat/fuel proof it, as I didnt want the shinyness. Any oil staines from flying can only enhance the look, and if they dont...they can be easily cleaned away, and the pencil weathering stays on! the paint chips are exactly what they are. Flat head screwdriver will give you that effect, but beware....you cant rub that off if you mess it up . Go on, give it a go. I'm glad I did!
#148
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: WaterloovilleHampshire, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
Malta sounds great too.........
I'll have a go with the pencil on my Corsair (next project). The Spit's a bit weather beaten after 18 months flying now anyway.
I'll have a go with the pencil on my Corsair (next project). The Spit's a bit weather beaten after 18 months flying now anyway.
#149
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bkara, MALTA
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: CMP/GSP Spitfire
great you should both come with your spits at our annual open day last year we had Sebastian Silvestri who did a great show but Spits will be nice as we fly off an old WW2 spit runway at Ta' Qali. In fact Sept. this year a real Spit and a Hurricane will be visiting the Island to flyover the Grand Harbour and then the old Runway.......I believe they are flying over from the UK with a good number of stopovers as they cannot make it in one go.
Joe
Joe