Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2014, 02:46 PM
  #9551  
Redback
Senior Member
 
Redback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: GraftonNew South Wales, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would make a great movie!

Terry
Old 03-25-2014, 05:09 AM
  #9552  
brn2fly
My Feedback: (190)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hobe Sound, FL
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Beechcraft Stagerwing
Old 03-25-2014, 05:17 AM
  #9553  
adavis
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 478
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Redback
(1) The military aircraft i am looking for had its origins in an executive aircraft
Bristol Blenheim?

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
Old 03-25-2014, 06:59 AM
  #9554  
brn2fly
My Feedback: (190)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hobe Sound, FL
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Beechcraft King Air
Old 03-25-2014, 12:09 PM
  #9555  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor?

Or the
[h=1]Cessna 526 CitationJet?[/h]

Last edited by JohnnyS; 03-25-2014 at 12:20 PM.
Old 03-25-2014, 12:42 PM
  #9556  
Redback
Senior Member
 
Redback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: GraftonNew South Wales, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry to be slow back on this, I've been sleeping!!!!

Adrian is correct, the Bristol Blenheim light bomber.

Based on an aircraft built for media magnate Lord Rorthermere which turned out to be significantly faster than any RAF fighter around at the time.

You are up sir!!!

Terry
Old 03-26-2014, 03:46 AM
  #9557  
adavis
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 478
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Next warbird:-

1) Two seat.

2) Biplane.

3) Designed for an environment in which it was never used.

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
Old 03-26-2014, 03:37 PM
  #9558  
RCKen
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
 
RCKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 27,767
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adavis
Next warbird:-

1) Two seat.

2) Biplane.

3) Designed for an environment in which it was never used.

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
Antonov An-2??



Ken
Old 03-27-2014, 01:35 AM
  #9559  
adavis
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 478
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Next question:-

1) Two seat.

2) Biplane.

3) Designed for an environment in which it was never used.

4) Shared a particular ability with another more well known aircraft produced by the same company.

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
Old 03-27-2014, 09:46 AM
  #9560  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

This is not really fair, as Ernie P. already answered it: The Fiesler Fi 167.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieseler_Fi_167

If Ernie wants, he can go ahead and take this and run with the next question.
Old 03-27-2014, 11:43 AM
  #9561  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyS
This is not really fair, as Ernie P. already answered it: The Fiesler Fi 167.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieseler_Fi_167

If Ernie wants, he can go ahead and take this and run with the next question.

JohnnyS; Let's wait until Adrian confirms that's the right answer. I know the Fieseler seems to meet all the requirements; but there are often multiple correct answers. If it is, you go ahead. Besides, I'm trying to lay back a bit. I don't want folks to get tired of my questions. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 03-28-2014, 12:50 AM
  #9562  
adavis
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 478
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyS
This is not really fair, as Ernie P. already answered it: The Fiesler Fi 167.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieseler_Fi_167

If Ernie wants, he can go ahead and take this and run with the next question.

Fiesler Fi 167 is correct - Sorry if this was a duplicate!!

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
Old 03-28-2014, 01:21 AM
  #9563  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adavis
Fiesler Fi 167 is correct - Sorry if this was a duplicate!!

Best Regards,
=Adrian=

Don't sweat the small stuff, Adrian; I was going to sit back and see if any one caught it. JohnnyS did, so I'll let him run with the next question. But, if he doesn't post anything by this evening, I'll post the next question. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 03-28-2014, 05:16 AM
  #9564  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thanks, Ernie P!

OK, let's see if I can come up with something interesting.

1. It was a test aircraft. Only one was built, but it was flown a LOT by many interesting people.

2. The next aircraft in the series was much faster. MUCH faster!

3. Developed using parts from different Beech aircraft models.

4. Twin engined.
Old 03-28-2014, 09:26 PM
  #9565  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

1. It was a test aircraft. Only one was built, but it was flown a LOT by many interesting people.

2. The next aircraft in the series was much faster. MUCH faster!

3. Developed using parts from different Beech aircraft models.

4. Twin engined.

5. Although jet powered, top speed was only 180 mph.
Old 03-29-2014, 10:49 AM
  #9566  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

1. It was a test aircraft. Only one was built, but it was flown a LOT by many interesting people.

2. The next aircraft in the series was much faster. MUCH faster!

3. Developed using parts from different Beech aircraft models.

4. Twin engined.

5. Although jet powered, top speed was only 180 mph.

6. At one point, a digital fly-by-wire control system was installed on the aircraft and it's designation was changed from (name)A to (name)B.
Old 03-30-2014, 10:11 AM
  #9567  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No guesses yet? Sad.

1. It was a test aircraft. Only one was built, but it was flown a LOT by many interesting people.

2. The next aircraft in the series was much faster. MUCH faster!

3. Developed using parts from different Beech aircraft models.

4. Twin engined.

5. Although jet powered, top speed was only 180 mph.

6. At one point, a digital fly-by-wire control system was installed on the aircraft and it's designation was changed from (name)A to (name)B.

7. First flight in 1957, retired in 1981.

8. Go back and re-read clue #2: The next aircraft in the series still holds records for speed.
Old 03-30-2014, 05:12 PM
  #9568  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bell X-14?
Old 03-30-2014, 06:55 PM
  #9569  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes, Yes, YES!!!

That's IT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_X-14



Sir, you ROCK, sir. Please go ahead with the next question!
Old 03-30-2014, 09:02 PM
  #9570  
Redback
Senior Member
 
Redback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: GraftonNew South Wales, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Zip

Now you gotta figure out a question! That'll teach you to be a smarty pants

Terry
Old 03-31-2014, 06:35 AM
  #9571  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Old 03-31-2014, 02:31 PM
  #9572  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, Lets see what obscure thing I can find that you guys can answer in one question!
Thanks ,
Zip!
Old 04-02-2014, 06:46 AM
  #9573  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zippome
Ok, Lets see what obscure thing I can find that you guys can answer in one question!
Thanks ,
Zip!
Zip; please post your question, Sir. Otherwise, we will have to move on. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 04-02-2014, 02:09 PM
  #9574  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Zip;

Last chance, Sir. Thanks; Ernie P.

Originally Posted by Ernie P.
Zip; please post your question, Sir. Otherwise, we will have to move on. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 04-02-2014, 03:09 PM
  #9575  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry Ernie! I meant to post last night but I ended up helping a buddy move. His divorce reminds me of the old joke. Q." Why is divorce so expensive?" A. "Because its worth it!"


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.