Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not the Shackleton
1 - This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed by this nation.
2- 4 engine
3 - For it’s time and type very fast
4 - Development of a new technology doomed it.
1 - This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed by this nation.
2- 4 engine
3 - For it’s time and type very fast
4 - Development of a new technology doomed it.
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not the Babazon either
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neither crash was caused by a design failure
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neither crash was caused by a design failure
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neither crash was caused by a design failure
6 Strongly built Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neither crash was caused by a design failure
6 Strongly built Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Neither the Victor nor the Valkyrie.
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.
13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.
13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Neither the Victor nor the Valkyrie.
1 This was the last in a long line of its type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For its time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1 thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesnt show up much on this site.
13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
1 This was the last in a long line of its type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For its time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1 thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesnt show up much on this site.
13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Neither the Victor nor the Valkyrie.
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.
13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.
13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
Pilotal; you have come up with a great question. I don't want to take the lead right now, because I'm hoping to go hunting next week, but I'm really getting tempted. Again, a great question and a .... Well, I don't want to give anything away. Thanks; Ernie P.
My Feedback: (49)
Neither the Victor nor the Valkyrie.
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.
13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.
13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron,
OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You got it ZIPPOME !!! The Seamaster was a great closer to a huge and largely unheralded part of Naval Aviation history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_P6M_SeaMaster
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You got it ZIPPOME !!! The Seamaster was a great closer to a huge and largely unheralded part of Naval Aviation history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_P6M_SeaMaster
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron,
OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Merry Christmas Everyone!
Ok, I thought i'd post a question before I nod off in a nice Christmas Nap!
1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
Ok, That's it for now!
Thanks!
Zip
5.
Ok, I thought i'd post a question before I nod off in a nice Christmas Nap!
1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
Ok, That's it for now!
Thanks!
Zip
5.
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron,
OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
Ok, That's it for now!
Thanks!
Zip
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
Ok, That's it for now!
Thanks!
Zip
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron,
OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
8. This aircraft went through many design changes during it's development.
9. Some include :
a) Straight wing to swept.
b) V tail to conventional.
c) Horizontal Stabilizer going from having dihedral to anhedral.
d) Also the wingtips needed some work, and wing fences had to be added.
Ok, That's it for now!
Thanks!
Zip
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
8. This aircraft went through many design changes during it's development.
9. Some include :
a) Straight wing to swept.
b) V tail to conventional.
c) Horizontal Stabilizer going from having dihedral to anhedral.
d) Also the wingtips needed some work, and wing fences had to be added.
Ok, That's it for now!
Thanks!
Zip
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron,
OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
8. This aircraft went through many design changes during it's development.
9. Some include :
a) Straight wing to swept.
b) V tail to conventional.
c) Horizontal Stabilizer going from having dihedral to anhedral.
d) Also the wingtips needed some work, and wing fences had to be added.
10. When the replacement aircraft was put into service, this plane was kept in service to be used in a support role to overcome a deficiency in the new aircraft.
11. It shares it's name with at least one other military aircraft. (of an older vintage)
Ok, That's it for now!
Thanks!
Zip
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
8. This aircraft went through many design changes during it's development.
9. Some include :
a) Straight wing to swept.
b) V tail to conventional.
c) Horizontal Stabilizer going from having dihedral to anhedral.
d) Also the wingtips needed some work, and wing fences had to be added.
10. When the replacement aircraft was put into service, this plane was kept in service to be used in a support role to overcome a deficiency in the new aircraft.
11. It shares it's name with at least one other military aircraft. (of an older vintage)
Ok, That's it for now!
Thanks!
Zip