Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-09-2015, 05:03 PM
  #12401  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Oops... I don't have one ready!

May I please just leave the floor open: Anyone with a good question please go ahead.
Old 12-09-2015, 08:16 PM
  #12402  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Okay, I have another one. Hopefully this one will take some time.
And again,it's a "Name the plane" quiz. Good Luck
1) This plane was developed for a specific purpose
Old 12-10-2015, 04:34 AM
  #12403  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

EA 6B Grumman Prowler .
Semper Fi
Old 12-10-2015, 04:39 AM
  #12404  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Now HERE'S a good question: Name a warbird that WASN'T developed for a specific purpose.
Old 12-10-2015, 05:21 AM
  #12405  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcguy59
Now HERE'S a good question: Name a warbird that WASN'T developed for a specific purpose.
Many planes were developed for a specific role and found to be better in another. Just look at the RA-5C Vigilante, a carrier based supersonic bomber that sucked in that role but excelled in photo-recon. Nope, not the Prowler. Now, back to the quiz:
1) This plane was developed for a specific purpose
2) This plane used an engine, built under license, developed by an ally
Old 12-10-2015, 06:47 AM
  #12406  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Bell P-59A Airacomet
http://www.aviation-history.com/bell/xp59.html
Old 12-10-2015, 08:21 AM
  #12407  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Not the P-59. Time for the next clue:
1) This plane was developed for a specific purpose
2) This plane used an engine, built under license, developed by an ally
3) This plane was armed with only one gun and explosive ordinance
Old 12-10-2015, 02:12 PM
  #12408  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
Many planes were developed for a specific role and found to be better in another. Just look at the RA-5C Vigilante, a carrier based supersonic bomber that sucked in that role but excelled in photo-recon. Nope, not the Prowler. Now, back to the quiz:
1) This plane was developed for a specific purpose
2) This plane used an engine, built under license, developed by an ally
Hydro I gotta disagree on the EA6B was developed as a Electronic Warfare Platform,, sure the Profile is similar to the A6 that's about all .. But it's your question
Semper Fi
Joe
Old 12-11-2015, 12:23 AM
  #12409  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Actually, the Prowler uses a standard Intruder airframe, up to the cockpit. The only real changes were the addition of the forward cockpit and the "football" on top of the vertical stab. Otherwise they are the same plane. In this case, I know the Prowler inside and out since I used to work on them while in the Navy. I also got to check out the Intruder and found that over 80% if the parts were common to both aircraft.
Old 12-11-2015, 12:27 AM
  #12410  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Time for another clue:
1) This plane was developed for a specific purpose
2) This plane used an engine, built under license, developed by an ally
3) This plane was armed with only one gun and explosive ordinance
4) This plane was intended to be used in stealthy operations
Old 12-11-2015, 05:07 AM
  #12411  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

F3D Skynight

NEED MOR HINTZ
Old 12-11-2015, 07:13 AM
  #12412  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Okay Porcia, I think I can handle "mor hintz". BTW, the F3D is not it either.
1) This plane was developed for a specific purpose
2) This plane used an engine, built under license, developed by an ally
3) This plane was armed with only one gun and explosive ordinance
4) This plane was intended to be used in stealthy operations
5) This plane's base was "mobile"
Old 12-11-2015, 11:09 AM
  #12413  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No...I meant mor helpful hintz.......back to thinking now. "mobile"...that's interesting
Old 12-11-2015, 11:20 AM
  #12414  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Supermarine Type 322. Singe gun, bomber, carrier based.
Old 12-11-2015, 10:47 PM
  #12415  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Not the 322 though you are slightly warmer. Time for another clue that may start to narrow this one down:
1) This plane was developed for a specific purpose
2) This plane used an engine, built under license, developed by an ally
3) This plane was armed with only one gun and explosive ordinance
4) This plane was intended to be used in stealthy operations
5) This plane's base was "mobile"
6) This plane's base did not have a flight deck


Old 12-11-2015, 11:51 PM
  #12416  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Aichi M6A1

1.Designed to be carried and launched by submarine.
2.Used license-built version of German DB-601.
3.Armed with one 13mm MG and gravity bombs.
4.You don't get much more stealthy than a submarine.
5.See #1.
6.It had launching rails.

One example survives in the National Air and Space Museum collection of the Smithsonian.

Last edited by rcguy59; 12-12-2015 at 12:13 AM.
Old 12-12-2015, 04:55 AM
  #12417  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Damn, not only did he get it right, he explained the clues. What gave it away?
Old 12-12-2015, 08:24 AM
  #12418  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
Damn, not only did he get it right, he explained the clues. What gave it away?
Ya but he didn't leave a URl to it: Had to go see what it looked like my self. There was also another Sub Launched BIPLANE that the japanese used to try and set the North West Coastal Forest On fire, too. Anyway here is the URL to the Aichi M6A1 on Wick
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aichi_M6A
Old 12-12-2015, 09:54 AM
  #12419  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
Damn, not only did he get it right, he explained the clues. What gave it away?
Way outta my league. Shoulda known with "Kelly" Johnson quote in his sig line.
Old 12-12-2015, 10:31 AM
  #12420  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No flight deck and the license-built engine were what sparked my memory. I saw something on this Aichi awhile back, and I guess I just remembered it because it was so weird. Also one of the rare examples of a Japanese airplane with an inline engine. I'll start thinking about a question.
Old 12-12-2015, 01:59 PM
  #12421  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This one shouldn't last too long.

1. This warbird never saw combat in it's intended role, though some were lost to hostile action.
Old 12-12-2015, 03:17 PM
  #12422  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1. This warbird never saw combat in it's intended role, though some were lost to hostile action.

2. When introduced, it was among the fastest military aircraft of it's time.
Old 12-12-2015, 04:05 PM
  #12423  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1. This warbird never saw combat in it's intended role, though some were lost to hostile action.

2. When introduced, it was among the fastest military aircraft of it's time.

3. It was also one of the heaviest.
Old 12-12-2015, 04:30 PM
  #12424  
porcia83
Banned
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 7,269
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll never get it, but what the heck, this might buy me another hint

Horton Ho?
Old 12-12-2015, 05:56 PM
  #12425  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No, but closer than you think. "Ho" is an incomplete designation and the spelling is "Horten", but I knew what you meant.

Last edited by rcguy59; 12-12-2015 at 05:59 PM.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.