Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2020, 10:45 AM
  #18151  
FlyerInOKC
My Feedback: (6)
 
FlyerInOKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 14,152
Received 272 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

How about the Messerschmitt Me 210?
Old 03-04-2020, 02:19 PM
  #18152  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

No correct answers thus far; but Top_Gunn and FlyerInOKC have earned a couple of bonus clues to go with an evening clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.




Old 03-05-2020, 04:05 AM
  #18153  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.

Old 03-05-2020, 06:10 AM
  #18154  
FlyerInOKC
My Feedback: (6)
 
FlyerInOKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 14,152
Received 272 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

How about the Blackburn Botha or the LaGG-3?
Old 03-05-2020, 07:07 AM
  #18155  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Sir; both good guesses, but not correct. Here's a bonus clue for you and I may as well post an afternoon clue as well. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.





Old 03-05-2020, 03:17 PM
  #18156  
elmshoot
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, IN,
Posts: 1,705
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Well how about the Brewester Buffalo?
Sparky
Old 03-05-2020, 03:25 PM
  #18157  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by elmshoot
Well how about the Brewester Buffalo?
Sparky
Not the Buffalo, Sparky; but you do earn a bonus clue for your attempt. This plane may have been worse; since the Buffalo was a bit long in the tooth and our subject aircraft was new to the field. And, here's an evening clue as well. Please try again. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.

Old 03-05-2020, 04:00 PM
  #18158  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,527
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Sounds kind of like the P-39, other than when used by the Russians as a tank buster
Old 03-05-2020, 04:11 PM
  #18159  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
Sounds kind of like the P-39, other than when used by the Russians as a tank buster
Not the P-39, Sir; but you do earn a bonus clue. Thanks; Ernie P.

PS: I've read that the P-39 being used as a tank buster was a total myth. Supposedly, the U.S. never sent AP ammo to the Russians for the P-39's cannon. It was all HE, for use against aircraft. Anyone know if there's any truth to the story? Tnx: EP


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.
Old 03-05-2020, 05:55 PM
  #18160  
Top_Gunn
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Granger, IN
Posts: 2,344
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Boulton Paul Defiant, maybe? Unsuccessful at its intended day fighter role, but a decent night fighter until better airplanes came along.
Old 03-05-2020, 08:26 PM
  #18161  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Top_Gunn
Boulton Paul Defiant, maybe? Unsuccessful at its intended day fighter role, but a decent night fighter until better airplanes came along.
Another very good, but incorrect, answer. This plane was as big a failure as the Defiant. And here's your bonus clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.

Old 03-06-2020, 08:28 AM
  #18162  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.
Old 03-06-2020, 02:42 PM
  #18163  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Afternoon and evening clues. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.
Old 03-07-2020, 10:36 AM
  #18164  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

No new guesses, so here's a couple of new clues. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.
Old 03-07-2020, 02:32 PM
  #18165  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.
Old 03-08-2020, 04:39 AM
  #18166  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.
Old 03-08-2020, 09:52 AM
  #18167  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Afternoon clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.
Old 03-08-2020, 02:49 PM
  #18168  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.



23. It had originally been intended to replace a particular earlier aircraft produced by the same company.
Old 03-09-2020, 03:06 AM
  #18169  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.



23. It had originally been intended to replace a particular earlier aircraft produced by the same company.



24. A very famous and very useful aircraft.
Old 03-09-2020, 07:30 AM
  #18170  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Afternoon clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.



23. It had originally been intended to replace a particular earlier aircraft produced by the same company.



24. A very famous and very useful aircraft.



25. It featured a top wing which gave it great forward visibility.
Old 03-09-2020, 01:58 PM
  #18171  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. Thanks; Ernie P.



What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.



23. It had originally been intended to replace a particular earlier aircraft produced by the same company.



24. A very famous and very useful aircraft.



25. It featured a top wing which gave it great forward visibility.



26. But much poorer rearward visibility; which was the direction from which the enemy aircraft which shot it down often came.
Old 03-10-2020, 08:13 AM
  #18172  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning and afternoon clues. And, they're big clues. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.



23. It had originally been intended to replace a particular earlier aircraft produced by the same company.



24. A very famous and very useful aircraft.



25. It featured a top wing which gave it great forward visibility.



26. But much poorer rearward visibility; which was the direction from which the enemy aircraft which shot it down often came.



27. It featured an improved gun system…. for its one machine gun.



28. While other aircraft, particularly its enemies, tended to carry two.
Old 03-10-2020, 02:04 PM
  #18173  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. And again, it's a big one! Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.



23. It had originally been intended to replace a particular earlier aircraft produced by the same company.



24. A very famous and very useful aircraft.



25. It featured a top wing which gave it great forward visibility.



26. But much poorer rearward visibility; which was the direction from which the enemy aircraft which shot it down often came.



27. It featured an improved gun system…. for its one machine gun.



28. While other aircraft, particularly its enemies, tended to carry two.



29. Having just produced a particularly outstanding light bomber, its designer and the company for which he worked were possibly more focused on producing and improving that aircraft.
Old 03-11-2020, 05:58 AM
  #18174  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.



23. It had originally been intended to replace a particular earlier aircraft produced by the same company.



24. A very famous and very useful aircraft.



25. It featured a top wing which gave it great forward visibility.



26. But much poorer rearward visibility; which was the direction from which the enemy aircraft which shot it down often came.



27. It featured an improved gun system…. for its one machine gun.



28. While other aircraft, particularly its enemies, tended to carry two.



29. Having just produced a particularly outstanding light bomber, its designer and the company for which he worked were possibly more focused on producing and improving that aircraft.



30. Our subject aircraft was, in fact, produced by several companies under license; in addition to its owners.
Old 03-11-2020, 08:28 AM
  #18175  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Afternoon clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


What warbird do I describe?



1. This aircraft was built by a famous and successful manufacturer.



2. It was designed by a famous and successful designer.



3. Together, those two had produced several famous and very successful aircraft.



4. But this aircraft was an unmitigated failure.



5. It did serve well in a new role; but by then its failure to fulfill its primary role had doomed it. It was simply second best, at its best.



6. In fact, it was little, if any, better than aircraft that were available more than a year earlier.



7. And markedly inferior to aircraft already in service when it arrived.



8. And since all this occurred when men were busily killing each other in the air, its failings were getting men killed.



9. And those men were decidedly unhappy with our subject aircraft.



10. Hundreds of this aircraft were produced.



11. And rapidly withdrawn from service as soon as those superior aircraft were available to replace them.



12. But it was in front line service for a while.



13. And while it was there, a very useful role was discovered at which it was pretty good.



14. But by then, the decision had already been made to withdraw it from service.



15. The basic problem seemed to be that it took too long to get our subject aircraft into service.



16. When it was designed and ordered into production, it would have been quite useful as produced.



17. But by the time it arrived, the war had progressed to the point it simply wasn’t very useful.



18. Its engine, which had been perfectly adequate when the aircraft was first tested, was now decidedly underpowered.



19. And since it was a bit on the heavy side, its performance, particularly at altitude, was inferior.



20. And as it tended to lose altitude when turning, its pilots were unhappy.



21. In fact, its performance got progressively worse the higher it flew.



22. Which wasn’t all that high to begin with.



23. It had originally been intended to replace a particular earlier aircraft produced by the same company.



24. A very famous and very useful aircraft.



25. It featured a top wing which gave it great forward visibility.



26. But much poorer rearward visibility; which was the direction from which the enemy aircraft which shot it down often came.



27. It featured an improved gun system…. for its one machine gun.



28. While other aircraft, particularly its enemies, tended to carry two.



29. Having just produced a particularly outstanding light bomber, its designer and the company for which he worked were possibly more focused on producing and improving that aircraft.



30. Our subject aircraft was, in fact, produced by several companies under license; in addition to its owners.



31. It featured rather large ailerons on both wings.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.