Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
What warbird do I describe?
1. This aircraft was in development for nearly ten years, but never reached production.
2. It was still in development when the war ended; and was not further developed.
3. This aircraft was designed to be a high speed bomber, able to evade enemy fighters through sheer speed.
4. It used an unusual engine design.
5. A shortage of engines was a very large part of the reason why the aircraft never reached production.
6. Only a handful of prototypes, and pre-production prototypes were produced.
7. Its design was probably an evolution of a noted previous design.
8. The previous design was very successful, setting several speed records.
9. This new aircraft set a speed record itself.
10. The design was significant in that aerodynamic drag was kept to an absolute minimum.
11. Its engine was set very close to the center of gravity.
12. The first couple of prototypes used retractable landing gear.
13. But the third was constructed with floats.
14. The fourth prototype set a new world speed record.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.
What warbird do I describe?
1. This aircraft was in development for nearly ten years, but never reached production.
2. It was still in development when the war ended; and was not further developed.
3. This aircraft was designed to be a high speed bomber, able to evade enemy fighters through sheer speed.
4. It used an unusual engine design.
5. A shortage of engines was a very large part of the reason why the aircraft never reached production.
6. Only a handful of prototypes, and pre-production prototypes were produced.
7. Its design was probably an evolution of a noted previous design.
8. The previous design was very successful, setting several speed records.
9. This new aircraft set a speed record itself.
10. The design was significant in that aerodynamic drag was kept to an absolute minimum.
11. Its engine was set very close to the center of gravity.
12. The first couple of prototypes used retractable landing gear.
13. But the third was constructed with floats. 14. The fourth prototype set a new world speed record.
15. The next few prototypes followed quickly, but the engine shortage became apparent and no more were produced.
What warbird do I describe?
1. This aircraft was in development for nearly ten years, but never reached production.
2. It was still in development when the war ended; and was not further developed.
3. This aircraft was designed to be a high speed bomber, able to evade enemy fighters through sheer speed.
4. It used an unusual engine design.
5. A shortage of engines was a very large part of the reason why the aircraft never reached production.
6. Only a handful of prototypes, and pre-production prototypes were produced.
7. Its design was probably an evolution of a noted previous design.
8. The previous design was very successful, setting several speed records.
9. This new aircraft set a speed record itself.
10. The design was significant in that aerodynamic drag was kept to an absolute minimum.
11. Its engine was set very close to the center of gravity.
12. The first couple of prototypes used retractable landing gear.
13. But the third was constructed with floats. 14. The fourth prototype set a new world speed record.
15. The next few prototypes followed quickly, but the engine shortage became apparent and no more were produced.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Sir; welcome aboard and I hope you enjoy participating in the forum. We have fun and learn a few things along the way. And, if you answer correctly, you get to ask the next question! Unfortunately, it is not the Martin P6M, but you have earned a bonus clue for your efforts. Stick with us and have fun. Thanks; Ernie P.
What warbird do I describe?
1. This aircraft was in development for nearly ten years, but never reached production.
2. It was still in development when the war ended; and was not further developed.
3. This aircraft was designed to be a high speed bomber, able to evade enemy fighters through sheer speed.
4. It used an unusual engine design.
5. A shortage of engines was a very large part of the reason why the aircraft never reached production.
6. Only a handful of prototypes, and pre-production prototypes were produced.
7. Its design was probably an evolution of a noted previous design.
8. The previous design was very successful, setting several speed records.
9. This new aircraft set a speed record itself.
10. The design was significant in that aerodynamic drag was kept to an absolute minimum.
11. Its engine was set very close to the center of gravity.
12. The first couple of prototypes used retractable landing gear.
13. But the third was constructed with floats.
14. The fourth prototype set a new world speed record.
15. The next few prototypes followed quickly, but the engine shortage became apparent and no more were produced.
16. Two of the prototypes were purchased by another country.
What warbird do I describe?
1. This aircraft was in development for nearly ten years, but never reached production.
2. It was still in development when the war ended; and was not further developed.
3. This aircraft was designed to be a high speed bomber, able to evade enemy fighters through sheer speed.
4. It used an unusual engine design.
5. A shortage of engines was a very large part of the reason why the aircraft never reached production.
6. Only a handful of prototypes, and pre-production prototypes were produced.
7. Its design was probably an evolution of a noted previous design.
8. The previous design was very successful, setting several speed records.
9. This new aircraft set a speed record itself.
10. The design was significant in that aerodynamic drag was kept to an absolute minimum.
11. Its engine was set very close to the center of gravity.
12. The first couple of prototypes used retractable landing gear.
13. But the third was constructed with floats.
14. The fourth prototype set a new world speed record.
15. The next few prototypes followed quickly, but the engine shortage became apparent and no more were produced.
16. Two of the prototypes were purchased by another country.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
What warbird do I describe?
1. This aircraft was in development for nearly ten years, but never reached production.
2. It was still in development when the war ended; and was not further developed.
3. This aircraft was designed to be a high speed bomber, able to evade enemy fighters through sheer speed.
4. It used an unusual engine design.
5. A shortage of engines was a very large part of the reason why the aircraft never reached production.
6. Only a handful of prototypes, and pre-production prototypes were produced.
7. Its design was probably an evolution of a noted previous design.
8. The previous design was very successful, setting several speed records.
9. This new aircraft set a speed record itself.
10. The design was significant in that aerodynamic drag was kept to an absolute minimum.
11. Its engine was set very close to the center of gravity.
12. The first couple of prototypes used retractable landing gear.
13. But the third was constructed with floats.
14. The fourth prototype set a new world speed record.
15. The next few prototypes followed quickly, but the engine shortage became apparent and no more were produced.
16. Two of the prototypes were purchased by another country.
17. These two were studied extensively, and resulted in a new prototype design by that country.
18. The second countrys design was never developed beyond the prototype stage.
19. Development ended in the second country when the prototype was destroyed.
Answer: The Heinkel He 119 The Heinkel He 119 was an experimental single-engine monoplane developed in Germany. A private venture by Heinkel to test radical ideas by the Gόnter brothers, the He 119 was originally intended to act as an unarmed reconnaissancebomber capable of eluding all fighters due to its high performance.
Development
Variants
Basic version, eight prototypes built.
He 5191944 high-speed bomber development, designed as a private venture by Heinkel to test radical ideas by the Gόnter brothers, the He 519 was designed to use the 24-cylinder Daimler-Benz DB 613, but the aircraft remained a concept and was abandoned at the end of the war.
Specifications (He 119 V6)
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Awesome, going to try not to botch this!
What warbird do I describe?
1. This aircraft never went beyond the drawing board.
2. Wind tunnel tests on models were stable in mach 2+ speeds
3. Was intended to use an unusual engine and fuel source.
What warbird do I describe?
1. This aircraft never went beyond the drawing board.
2. Wind tunnel tests on models were stable in mach 2+ speeds
3. Was intended to use an unusual engine and fuel source.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Sir; I was just up, so I'm not going to answer; but I think this one won't go very far. I'm pretty sure this bunch will be all over this in short order. But good on you for finding an interesting aircraft to highlight. Thanks; Ernie P.
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Martinsville, WV
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, I'll take a swing at it. how about the ramjet powered coal fueled Lippisch P.13a
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lippisch_P.13a
Dr. Alexander Lippisch and his designs were required reading when I was working on my masters in aerospace engineering.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lippisch_P.13a
Dr. Alexander Lippisch and his designs were required reading when I was working on my masters in aerospace engineering.
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, like I said, hoped to not botch this, but you have your answer!
The MilitaryFactory site has some more info on this as well, I can't however post the URL yet due to lack of posts. Interesting plane I had personally never heard of.
Looks like Sekhet is up.
The MilitaryFactory site has some more info on this as well, I can't however post the URL yet due to lack of posts. Interesting plane I had personally never heard of.
Looks like Sekhet is up.
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Martinsville, WV
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll get a question up in a little bit, I have to do a thing or two to show the boss I'm worth my paycheck.
dmcguire, you didn't botch it, you just gave us three very good clues!
dmcguire, you didn't botch it, you just gave us three very good clues!
Last edited by Sekhet; 04-11-2018 at 12:40 PM.
https://www.militaryfactory.com/airc...rcraft_id=1078
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Martinsville, WV
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, I'm not sure if this subject has been used or not (having troubles with the forum search) but I'm going to let her rip 'tater chip.
I'm looking for a warbird.
1. This bird started life as a civilian aircraft
2. Due to modifications made for the military configuration, performance was degraded but was considered sufficient for the anticipated mission requirements.
3. This aircraft was put into military service by fourteen countries.
I'm looking for a warbird.
1. This bird started life as a civilian aircraft
2. Due to modifications made for the military configuration, performance was degraded but was considered sufficient for the anticipated mission requirements.
3. This aircraft was put into military service by fourteen countries.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Sir; you did well. Actually, it's a testament to the depth of knowledge of the contributors on this forum that, not only did several people have knowledge of the Lippisch P.13a, they were able to connect the dots and recognize it as the subject aircraft. Well done all! Thanks; Ernie P.
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Martinsville, WV
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Time for another Clue.
I'm looking for a warbird.
1. This bird started life as a civilian aircraft
2. Due to modifications made for the military configuration, performance was degraded but was considered sufficient for the anticipated mission requirements.
3. This aircraft was put into military service by fourteen countries.
4. This aircraft, in military configuration, had a crew of two.
I'm looking for a warbird.
1. This bird started life as a civilian aircraft
2. Due to modifications made for the military configuration, performance was degraded but was considered sufficient for the anticipated mission requirements.
3. This aircraft was put into military service by fourteen countries.
4. This aircraft, in military configuration, had a crew of two.
Last edited by Sekhet; 04-12-2018 at 06:24 AM.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Time for another Clue.
I'm looking for a warbird.
1. This bird started life as a civilian aircraft
2. Due to modifications made for the military configuration, performance was degraded but was considered sufficient for the anticipated mission requirements.
3. This aircraft was put into military service by fourteen countries.
4. This aircraft, in military configuration, had a crew of two.
I'm looking for a warbird.
1. This bird started life as a civilian aircraft
2. Due to modifications made for the military configuration, performance was degraded but was considered sufficient for the anticipated mission requirements.
3. This aircraft was put into military service by fourteen countries.
4. This aircraft, in military configuration, had a crew of two.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Well, if we're going that direction, how about the Cessna L-19/O-1 Bird Dog? It seems as though there were several planes which fit the clues, but I still don't think that's where he's going. Thanks; Ernie P.
The Cessna L-19/O-1 Bird Dog was a liaison and observation aircraft. It was the first all-metal fixed-wing aircraft ordered for and by the United States Army since the U.S. Army Air Forces separated from the Army in 1947, becoming its own branch of service, the United States Air Force. The Bird Dog had a lengthy career in the U.S. military, as well as in other countries.
The Cessna L-19/O-1 Bird Dog was a liaison and observation aircraft. It was the first all-metal fixed-wing aircraft ordered for and by the United States Army since the U.S. Army Air Forces separated from the Army in 1947, becoming its own branch of service, the United States Air Force. The Bird Dog had a lengthy career in the U.S. military, as well as in other countries.
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Martinsville, WV
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow! FlyerinOKC you nailed it! The Cessna O-2 Skymaster (nicknamed "Oscar Deuce" "Mixmaster") is the one I'm after.
I've owned the civil version, Cessna 337 super Skymaster, and loved every moment of it.
FlyerInOKC you have the runway!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_O-2_Skymaster
I've owned the civil version, Cessna 337 super Skymaster, and loved every moment of it.
FlyerInOKC you have the runway!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_O-2_Skymaster
My Feedback: (6)
Considering how wiped out I am with a cough I'm surprised I nailed it. The bad news is the pulmonologist can't get me in until August! And they say the VA is tough to get an appointment.
I'm looking for a Warbird.
1. It was designed by a well know aircraft company.
2. This airplane was the first of it's type for the company to be built for this branch of the service.
3. Two additional countries licensed the design and produced the airplane.
I'm looking for a Warbird.
1. It was designed by a well know aircraft company.
2. This airplane was the first of it's type for the company to be built for this branch of the service.
3. Two additional countries licensed the design and produced the airplane.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Considering how wiped out I am with a cough I'm surprised I nailed it. The bad news is the pulmonologist can't get me in until August! And they say the VA is tough to get an appointment.
I'm looking for a Warbird.
1. It was designed by a well know aircraft company.
2. This airplane was the first of it's type for the company to be built for this branch of the service.
3. Two additional countries licensed the design and produced the airplane.
I'm looking for a Warbird.
1. It was designed by a well know aircraft company.
2. This airplane was the first of it's type for the company to be built for this branch of the service.
3. Two additional countries licensed the design and produced the airplane.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Considering how wiped out I am with a cough I'm surprised I nailed it. The bad news is the pulmonologist can't get me in until August! And they say the VA is tough to get an appointment.
I'm looking for a Warbird.
1. It was designed by a well know aircraft company.
2. This airplane was the first of it's type for the company to be built for this branch of the service.
3. Two additional countries licensed the design and produced the airplane.
I'm looking for a Warbird.
1. It was designed by a well know aircraft company.
2. This airplane was the first of it's type for the company to be built for this branch of the service.
3. Two additional countries licensed the design and produced the airplane.
The Grumman FF "Fifi" (company designation G-5) was an American biplane fighter aircraft operated by the United States Navy during the 1930s. It was the first carrier aircraft with retractable landing gear. It was produced under licence in Canada and known as the Goblin in Canadian service and Delfin (enolphin) in Spanish service.
My Feedback: (6)
Darn it Ernie you are too good! I didn't think anyone would catch on so quick since it had never really touted for its war service.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_FF
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_FF