TR624 vs TR625
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Beaver Dam, WI
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am looking to upgrade my Hitec Optic 6 to 2.4 and am looking at the Tactic module to do this. For the airplanes why would a person choose the TR625 receiver vs. the TR624? They are both listed as full range receivers so I am not sure what the big difference is between the 2 (besides 1 vs 2 antennas and price). I fly primarily 40 size sport aircraft so mounting the 2 antennas perpendicular to each other would prove a little challenging.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Beaver Dam, WI
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I saw that on the website, but other than "demanding radio environments" I did not see a real difference. What does that mean, why would I choose one receiver over another?
#4
![](/forum/images/badges/premium_vendor.png)
My Feedback: (11)
![Default](https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you have an aircraft with a carbon fuselage, a metal-covered one, one with a lot of metal components, you are flying at the extremes of range, in a noisy RF environment, and so forth. The additional antenna gives you better reception because you can position it away from the first antenna and at a different angle.