crash
#26
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
I don't claim to be an expert on everything, I try to keep my opinions within the range of things that I know. But in addition to running this business I have been a modeler for a long time.
When I see a new product I generally do a quick evaluation to see if it's something that I can use to improve my setup or to solve a problem. IF it seems to be of no value to me, then I notice when others use it and ask them "why" to try to learn what they know that I don't. More often than not the answe back is "because I saw i in an ad" or "because the big guys use it" or even "because I had it".
It's almost never "I had this problem and this geegaw solved it nicely".
I'm all in favor of using the latest gizmo if it actually does something that needs doing. For example a power box seems to make sense on a really big plane with 14 servos, if for no other reason than it gives you a place to plug everything in neatly. But putting a power box on a 28% plane with 6 servos makes no sense and seem to add nothing but weight and complexity, yet lots of people do it.
I don't think that it's necessary to understand the internals of everything before you buy it. BUt I strongly recommend that you ask yourself two questions before buying something that you think is cool;
1. Do I actually need this thing or am I trying to solve an imaginary problem?
2. If I put this thing in my plane, will it actually make things better?
I'm always happy to answer specific questions if I can.
TF
When I see a new product I generally do a quick evaluation to see if it's something that I can use to improve my setup or to solve a problem. IF it seems to be of no value to me, then I notice when others use it and ask them "why" to try to learn what they know that I don't. More often than not the answe back is "because I saw i in an ad" or "because the big guys use it" or even "because I had it".
It's almost never "I had this problem and this geegaw solved it nicely".
I'm all in favor of using the latest gizmo if it actually does something that needs doing. For example a power box seems to make sense on a really big plane with 14 servos, if for no other reason than it gives you a place to plug everything in neatly. But putting a power box on a 28% plane with 6 servos makes no sense and seem to add nothing but weight and complexity, yet lots of people do it.
I don't think that it's necessary to understand the internals of everything before you buy it. BUt I strongly recommend that you ask yourself two questions before buying something that you think is cool;
1. Do I actually need this thing or am I trying to solve an imaginary problem?
2. If I put this thing in my plane, will it actually make things better?
I'm always happy to answer specific questions if I can.
TF
#30
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Evans,
CO
With the battery's you are using I wouldn't. It adds 3 possible failure points to the system. two plugs and the regulator its self. I don't see any benefit to using the regulator.
#31

My Feedback: (10)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Puryear, TN
ORIGINAL: MrKindNuggz
2400 4.8 on ign
1700 6.0volt on rx both MPI
2400 4.8 on ign
1700 6.0volt on rx both MPI
#34
Junior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Princeton,
MN
ORIGINAL: rctom
Once you get an acceptable range check with a PPM/FM receiver and with the engine running, now you can go back to the PCM and recheck the range.
It's worth the $60 (Hitec Supreme 8 channel FM) to keep one of these around just for checking out you plane, even if you never fly with it.
TF
Once you get an acceptable range check with a PPM/FM receiver and with the engine running, now you can go back to the PCM and recheck the range.
It's worth the $60 (Hitec Supreme 8 channel FM) to keep one of these around just for checking out you plane, even if you never fly with it.
TF
in a case such as this can one use the 5945's & 5955 on a fm receiver? just to get a good inital range check before installing the pcm rec.
#36
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
Absolutely you can use all your servos on the FM rcvr. In fact there's no real need to put in the PCM once you have everything working right. FM should fly the plane fine.
TF
TF
#37
The only time I've seen a PCM make a difference is with a stock G62. Apparently the ignition that comes with that engine is junk. However, I have seen planes with G62's fly with FM receivers.
#38
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Vicksburg, MS
Tom, I just remembered where I got my information about the minimum voltage stuff. It was on the ElectroDynamics website. I have one of their optical kill switches and was looking around thieir website and that's where I saw the discussion on minimum voltages. Check it out and see if it makes sense that once the NiCd went below 6.0 volts there was no more electrons flowing to the RX.
Bobby
Bobby
#39
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas),
TX
I think the "about to be dead" voltage cutoff is about 1.1v per cell. I won't fly below 1.2 because there's almost nothing left.
When I heard the description I immediately thought "battery". The fact that it was still working on the ground can be explained, the loads in the air are heavier and would require a lot more current to work.
TF
When I heard the description I immediately thought "battery". The fact that it was still working on the ground can be explained, the loads in the air are heavier and would require a lot more current to work.
TF
#41

My Feedback: (25)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cabot,
AR
Some of the 1700mAh packs have high internal resistance... I've had bad luck with them. Were your voltage measurements under a 1 amp load or static (I don't trust static voltage measurements)? Did you discharge the rest of your RX pack after your crash to see how much was left in it? Try doing a vibration test on your switch and RX... put a small allen wrench in a moto tool and turn it on slow so that it vibrates. Touch it to your radio components one at a time while it is operating (including plugs and switches)... if there are any loose components they should show up with this test. I'm not to impressed with the JR "Heavy Duty" switches... they are kinda junk inside... easy for parts to come loose.



