Community
Search
Notices
WildHare R/C Support Disscuss WildHare RC products in this forum. Please note, answers may be provided by Tom Fawcett (owner of WildHare RC) or by the general membership.

crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2005 | 05:26 PM
  #26  
rctom's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX
Default RE: crash

I don't claim to be an expert on everything, I try to keep my opinions within the range of things that I know. But in addition to running this business I have been a modeler for a long time.

When I see a new product I generally do a quick evaluation to see if it's something that I can use to improve my setup or to solve a problem. IF it seems to be of no value to me, then I notice when others use it and ask them "why" to try to learn what they know that I don't. More often than not the answe back is "because I saw i in an ad" or "because the big guys use it" or even "because I had it".

It's almost never "I had this problem and this geegaw solved it nicely".

I'm all in favor of using the latest gizmo if it actually does something that needs doing. For example a power box seems to make sense on a really big plane with 14 servos, if for no other reason than it gives you a place to plug everything in neatly. But putting a power box on a 28% plane with 6 servos makes no sense and seem to add nothing but weight and complexity, yet lots of people do it.

I don't think that it's necessary to understand the internals of everything before you buy it. BUt I strongly recommend that you ask yourself two questions before buying something that you think is cool;

1. Do I actually need this thing or am I trying to solve an imaginary problem?
2. If I put this thing in my plane, will it actually make things better?

I'm always happy to answer specific questions if I can.

TF
Old 05-10-2005 | 05:41 PM
  #27  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Default RE: crash

yes it is possible
Old 05-10-2005 | 05:52 PM
  #28  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Default RE: crash

2400 4.8 on ign
1700 6.0volt on rx both MPI


on last flight 5.32 0n ign battery
and 6.53 on rx battery
Old 05-10-2005 | 05:56 PM
  #29  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Default RE: crash

thanx for all the help, ive been reading alot about
people saying its best to use a regulater,true or not?


signed MR KIND
Old 05-10-2005 | 06:19 PM
  #30  
mstroh3961's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Evans, CO
Default RE: crash

With the battery's you are using I wouldn't. It adds 3 possible failure points to the system. two plugs and the regulator its self. I don't see any benefit to using the regulator.

Old 05-10-2005 | 08:02 PM
  #31  
Nogyro's Avatar
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Puryear, TN
Default RE: crash


ORIGINAL: MrKindNuggz

2400 4.8 on ign
1700 6.0volt on rx both MPI

Not sure why you're running a 2400 ma on ignition. I believe you said you had a DA50 on it. That's what I'm running and I get 2 hours actual run time with a 4.8 volt 1100 ma AA nicad pack....
Old 05-10-2005 | 08:18 PM
  #32  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Default RE: crash

r u runnin a regulater on your rx
Old 05-10-2005 | 08:28 PM
  #33  
Nogyro's Avatar
My Feedback: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Puryear, TN
Default RE: crash

No regulators. I'm running 2-6 volt 1100 ma AA nicad packs, 2 switch harnesses plugged into seperate channels in the receiver. 2 hrs flight time....IMAC and 3D flying.....
Old 05-10-2005 | 08:31 PM
  #34  
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Princeton, MN
Default RE: crash


ORIGINAL: rctom

Once you get an acceptable range check with a PPM/FM receiver and with the engine running, now you can go back to the PCM and recheck the range.

It's worth the $60 (Hitec Supreme 8 channel FM) to keep one of these around just for checking out you plane, even if you never fly with it.

TF
very informative tom & thankx, just so happens this is the way i built my 1st gasser, but it was due to lack of funds... started with DA50 & ppm/FM with 645's then went to 5945's with pcm receiver of course.

in a case such as this can one use the 5945's & 5955 on a fm receiver? just to get a good inital range check before installing the pcm rec.
Old 05-10-2005 | 08:50 PM
  #35  
mstroh3961's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Evans, CO
Default RE: crash

I used a ppm hitech recever to do the install and initial rainge checks, after finding no glitching then put the PCM recever in.
Old 05-10-2005 | 09:55 PM
  #36  
rctom's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX
Default RE: crash

Absolutely you can use all your servos on the FM rcvr. In fact there's no real need to put in the PCM once you have everything working right. FM should fly the plane fine.

TF
Old 05-10-2005 | 10:05 PM
  #37  
ben beyer's Avatar
My Feedback: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,385
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bryan TX
Default RE: crash

The only time I've seen a PCM make a difference is with a stock G62. Apparently the ignition that comes with that engine is junk. However, I have seen planes with G62's fly with FM receivers.
Old 05-11-2005 | 11:13 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Vicksburg, MS
Default RE: crash

Tom, I just remembered where I got my information about the minimum voltage stuff. It was on the ElectroDynamics website. I have one of their optical kill switches and was looking around thieir website and that's where I saw the discussion on minimum voltages. Check it out and see if it makes sense that once the NiCd went below 6.0 volts there was no more electrons flowing to the RX.

Bobby
Old 05-11-2005 | 12:06 PM
  #39  
rctom's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Flower Mound (near Dallas), TX
Default RE: crash

I think the "about to be dead" voltage cutoff is about 1.1v per cell. I won't fly below 1.2 because there's almost nothing left.

When I heard the description I immediately thought "battery". The fact that it was still working on the ground can be explained, the loads in the air are heavier and would require a lot more current to work.

TF
Old 05-11-2005 | 01:29 PM
  #40  
mstroh3961's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Evans, CO
Default RE: crash

Also the voltage will come back up slightly after the load is removed.
Old 05-11-2005 | 03:01 PM
  #41  
sillyness's Avatar
My Feedback: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cabot, AR
Default RE: crash

Some of the 1700mAh packs have high internal resistance... I've had bad luck with them. Were your voltage measurements under a 1 amp load or static (I don't trust static voltage measurements)? Did you discharge the rest of your RX pack after your crash to see how much was left in it? Try doing a vibration test on your switch and RX... put a small allen wrench in a moto tool and turn it on slow so that it vibrates. Touch it to your radio components one at a time while it is operating (including plugs and switches)... if there are any loose components they should show up with this test. I'm not to impressed with the JR "Heavy Duty" switches... they are kinda junk inside... easy for parts to come loose.
Old 05-11-2005 | 03:32 PM
  #42  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Default RE: crash

im from U.S.A wats a moto tool?
Old 05-11-2005 | 03:41 PM
  #43  
sillyness's Avatar
My Feedback: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Cabot, AR
Default RE: crash

I bought mine in the USA... same as a Dremel. Little high RPM hand tool.
Old 05-11-2005 | 06:33 PM
  #44  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Default RE: crash

oh!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.