Community
Search
Notices
WildHare R/C Support Disscuss WildHare RC products in this forum. Please note, answers may be provided by Tom Fawcett (owner of WildHare RC) or by the general membership.

DA50 Vs EVO58

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2006 | 07:09 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,602
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Valley Springs, CA
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

I agree, most of yours is fairly level and flown where the prop rips
Old 07-29-2006 | 07:44 PM
  #52  
dhooks's Avatar
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Lake Butler , FL
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

Good stuff on the break in techniques, I grew up in a shop an have worked on an saw inside anything from small model engines to heavy eqpt.

Amazes me how some ppl think their engines with 2-3 bearings an a cpl rings break in for the first 1,200 gallons ( yes I inflated the number but only slightly).


I guess the bearings smooth out?
Old 07-29-2006 | 08:38 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,602
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Valley Springs, CA
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

You mean some actually have more than 1 ring!!??
Old 08-15-2006 | 08:57 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kokomo, IN
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

T.bob there is no risk with the Evolution 58GX. I have been flying my 58GX Generation 1 know for over 6 gallons and it flys my TOC1 Yak 54 30% just fine. Matter of fact I have a friend with a DA50 on a WH Edge, been in the shop know 5 times in two years. Yes you are right about DA's service, impeckable. However, if you get a front line person @ Horizon vs. a manager then yes a little squirlley but nothing that can't be fixed by asking for a product manager. Both motors are very good motors, but I really feel the GX is a better fit for most 25, 28 and 30% airplanes.
Old 08-16-2006 | 06:55 AM
  #55  
jongurley's Avatar
My Feedback: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Goldsboro, NC
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

There have been alot of head gasket/shattered ring problems from the 58 recently ,,,, ??????????do a search,. I have a buddy that flies with me,, he had his EVO58 blow a head gasket after three gallons I think, they fixed it promptly under warranty,, if anyone has any question pm him ,,, andyt is RCU name,,,
Old 08-16-2006 | 07:40 AM
  #56  
b-mccor8's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: hegins, PA
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

I have a 28% extra 300, I went with the carbonfiber landing gear spinner and wing and stab tubes, I measured the weight of each item down the the gram, if memory serves me correctly for my 200.00 bucks I shaved off 1.5 lbs to me it was worth the money. I did use all graphtech except the spinner. If you get their landing gear buy the new 3d weave design, 50 plus flight and it is still fine.
If you are interested in exact weght let me know. Brenden


ORIGINAL: ICE_MAN

Ok theres a 6 Oz. savings...

Did anyone check out the RCSupergear site?
Old 08-20-2006 | 07:14 PM
  #57  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (25)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fairmount, IN
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

Jimmyjoe,
I assume you are talking about my DA50 since I think I am the only one you know that has one on an Edge. Your numbers are somewhat stretched. The engine has been to the shop twice. Once for the upgrades and once recently for the ignition. The ignition damage was my fault as i told you at the field. I had asked you once before not to use me and my equipment to make your points. If you insist on doing it , be accurate. Just be honest and don't stretch the truth.
Mike
Old 08-25-2006 | 01:55 PM
  #58  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 130
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: PERTH, AUSTRALIA
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

i had a evolution 58gx on a yak. really good engine.
i had a da 50 on a vision. really good engine.

the evolution does spin a bigger prop than the da. it is heavier though.

i would choose the evolution 58 over the da50 for a 30% sized airframe. i just like to rocket out of torque rolls and the da 50 doesnt do that.


aerowiz.
Old 09-11-2006 | 07:14 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (25)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fairmount, IN
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

Makes sense that the 58 would be more powerful than the 50. It is about 15% larger. Duh.
Old 09-12-2006 | 09:07 AM
  #60  
Greg Cothern's Avatar
My Feedback: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Combine, TX
Default RE: DA50 Vs EVO58

Wouldnt a better comparison be made between the MVVS 45 and the DA50?? They are almost the same size in weight and closer in cc's.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.