Show your overpowered plane...
#178
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: baton rouge,
LA
I might have a winner. I don't actually have this combo yet but I am seriously considering it. Hangar 9 frenzy 100 with an os 1.60 2 stroke. Every thread has said this plane is severly tail heavy to the point of having to add like 16oz to the nose so this engine should be just the ticket. For those of you not familiar with this plane the auw is supposed to be between 6 and 9lbs with 9lbs being with an electric setup. Hangar nine calls for a 61-100 2 stroke.
#182
Senior Member
I will assemble my Harrier 90 this autum and it will be powered by my ASP 180 fs. I expect it to achieve 2-1 in the thrust-weight department
#183
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Monument, CO
ORIGINAL: Kostas1
NAHHHHHHHHHHHH...........[>:][>:][>:][>:][>:][>:]
BABY I WON YOU..........ENGINE IS OS 91 FX BEAST.........yiouhooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuu.........
ORIGINAL: UCD46@SAITO
Ucd 46 with a Saito 100 , 14x8, 15x4w prop!!! a total killer!!!![>:]
Ucd 46 with a Saito 100 , 14x8, 15x4w prop!!! a total killer!!!![>:]
NAHHHHHHHHHHHH...........[>:][>:][>:][>:][>:][>:]
BABY I WON YOU..........ENGINE IS OS 91 FX BEAST.........yiouhooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuu.........
I don't know what your so happy about. Two strokes suck
#184
Senior Member
Yeah, I have the 91 FX too and it is by no means a beast at all. I was very dissapointed by its stock power. After fitting a Tower 75 muffler and a 60L carb plus some dremelwork on the sleeve it became much more powerful, plus the Tower muffler saved 50 grams off the weight. Stock 91 FX is weighing 770 grams and an YS 110 is lighter and alot more power
#186
My brother´s Fliton Edge Freestyle with a G-26 Zenoah, the weight was way too much for the poor landing gear, looking for a replacement.
#187
YOU had an earlier one.....new ones are IMPROVED!
And
as for "2strokes suck" maybe you must think first before you reply?OK?
Beauty is on the eye of the beholder.....[8D]
And
as for "2strokes suck" maybe you must think first before you reply?OK?
Beauty is on the eye of the beholder.....[8D]
#188
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Monument, CO
ORIGINAL: Kostas1
YOU had an earlier one.....new ones are IMPROVED!
And
as for "2strokes suck" maybe you must think first before you reply?OK?
Beauty is on the eye of the beholder.....[8D]
YOU had an earlier one.....new ones are IMPROVED!
And
as for "2strokes suck" maybe you must think first before you reply?OK?
Beauty is on the eye of the beholder.....[8D]
No beauty is in the torque for 3-D flying. RPM isn't what you need for a U-Can-Do
#189
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Murchison, TX
Kbless I will agree 4 strokes are nice for the torque, but there is no reason you cant do the same hover/3d stuff with a 2stroke. Lots of the profile bros use 2 strokes. I like em all, cept turbines unless its full scale and I aint buying the fuel.
#196

My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Jose,
CA
I think I'm in the top 2 this is my world model t-34 with a 120 YS SC. It is fricken unbelievable it was reinforced and still bend the wings in a pylon turn. Take off roll 4 inches, handled and tracked like a pattern plane, sounded like a John Deere on steroids.
Keep the planes coming.................
Keep the planes coming.................
#199
How about a TWIST 150 with an OS 160fx...
Will hover 3 clicks above idel..

GREAT inverted flat spins up and down with the throttle





]My Extra 330S from GreatPlanes and OS 55 AX engine counts? [