3 Bladed Prop for 3D
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ofallon,
MO
I think the only advantage is better down line breaking than with a 2 blade. Overall 3 blade props are not nearly as efficient than a 2 blade, but they look cool and if you have the power to spare go for it.
Just curious did you get the problem with the evo figured out?
Just curious did you get the problem with the evo figured out?
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Johns Creek,
GA
depends on the engine..... anything under...about a 50cc engine.... the 3 blade prop is far too inefficient....
some use them on sport/trainer planes, or on a scale application, but they are very inefficient for 3D...
what engine?
some use them on sport/trainer planes, or on a scale application, but they are very inefficient for 3D...
what engine?
#4
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (23)
I'm still working on it. Dick Hanson had mentioned in an earlier thread that the 24x10 might be too much for the engine here at 5000 ft. So, I ordered a smaller prop today. I wanted to get a Mejzlik 24x8, but they don't make one so I got a 23x10. Another guy started using a 24x10 on his and only got 6200 RPM so i'm also thinking the altitude may play a big role. I replumbed the tank in case the problem was arising there. I doubt my new prop will be here by this weekend so I can see what the current improvements are. I know some people may disagree with the prop decision, but right now I think it's something i'm going to end up trying in the end.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: sydney, AUSTRALIA
HI i run a 3 blade on my mvvs 58 22x12x3 & its the ultimate combo.3D& IMAC are insane.
its a great set up as i have had my props on this motor.LOOKS ARE A ADDED BONOUS
cheers glen
its a great set up as i have had my props on this motor.LOOKS ARE A ADDED BONOUS
cheers glen
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Copenhagen, DENMARK
So a 23x8 will be more efficient at braking than a 22x10?
How about an 3x21x10 in a theoretic comparison?
As it is, these are the choices that I consider for my Evolution 45GX (equal to DA50 in power), but can't quite decide. Will use for 3D and precision, with bias towards precision.
How about an 3x21x10 in a theoretic comparison?
As it is, these are the choices that I consider for my Evolution 45GX (equal to DA50 in power), but can't quite decide. Will use for 3D and precision, with bias towards precision.
#11
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (23)
23x8 would be better at braking than a 22x10. I can't say about the other prop. The reason why I bought a 23x10 is that the 24x10 seems to be too big and Mejzlik doesn't make a 24x8. I'm not trying to stay with them because of the name, but rather that I have a carbon fiber spinner and I don't want to adjust the slots myself.



