Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
 mojo / primo setup >

mojo / primo setup

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

mojo / primo setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2008 | 12:06 PM
  #26  
tmproff's Avatar
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Humble, TX
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

I always thought that the engines were less efficient because the props were less efficient, not because the combustion was affected.....Interesting!
Old 12-16-2008 | 12:13 PM
  #27  
plugin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bogota, COLOMBIA
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

Same thing will happen to a car. If I drive to sea level, my car will notably increase it's performance.
Old 12-16-2008 | 12:18 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,825
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Floroe, NORWAY
Default RE: mojo / primo setup


ORIGINAL: plugin

Sounds really good. Too good to be true actually. Why on earth does this work?

These Tower mufflers are semi tuned in a way. They have greater internal volume and allows the engine to breathe out more freely. In a test I did the Tower .75 muffler held 222 grams of water and my stock 91 FX muffler held 185 grams of water (could be a little off here, it is a long time ago, but the Tower muffler is definetly bigger)

They are also built very light due to very thin materials, quite opposite of the stock OS muffler which feels like a brick. The stock muffler is very restricted in the outlet and before getting the Tower muffler I just drilled out the stinger to the max and removed the baffle inside, that helped alot in the power departement
Old 12-16-2008 | 12:58 PM
  #29  
plugin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bogota, COLOMBIA
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

Are standard high torque servos for this plane enough or should I get digital?
Old 12-16-2008 | 02:16 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Katy, TX
Default RE: mojo / primo setup


ORIGINAL: plugin

Same thing will happen to a car. If I drive to sea level, my car will notably increase it's performance.
Where you are you will likly need more engine then the OS 91 2 stroke, on the****************** site we have some people who live in Denver and they have to use more motor.

I would guess that a Saito 115 would be the best choice Normally the Saito 100 is the perfect match for the Swanyshouse Mojo MoAss 60.
Old 12-16-2008 | 02:18 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Katy, TX
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

No the 60 requires more servo then standard, You may get away with them on ailerons but on the tail I would stepup a bit, Metal gear would be best IMHO
Old 12-17-2008 | 04:22 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: palm coast, FL
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

Just set up with what you have and have fun

Then you can go from there....

I've got theprimo 40 w/ saito 72 325 hitec all around with 6vt and having a blast with it...
Old 12-17-2008 | 08:12 PM
  #33  
plugin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bogota, COLOMBIA
Default RE: mojo / primo setup


ORIGINAL: PBThumbs


ORIGINAL: plugin

Same thing will happen to a car. If I drive to sea level, my car will notably increase it's performance.
Where you are you will likly need more engine then the OS 91 2 stroke, on the****************** site we have some people who live in Denver and they have to use more motor.

I would guess that a Saito 115 would be the best choice Normally the Saito 100 is the perfect match for the Swanyshouse Mojo MoAss 60.
The reason I want to use the 91FX is because I have one lying around. If that engine wont allow me to hover the MOJO 60 then I have to consider another option.
Old 12-17-2008 | 09:15 PM
  #34  
My Feedback: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Eldon, MO
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

An OS 91 FX will definitely hover a Mojo 60, even at your altitude. But it won't have much reserve power to pull out of a hover, or have enough power to let you feel comfortable learning to hover.

I'd recommend choosing a more powerful engine.
Old 12-17-2008 | 11:38 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Katy, TX
Default RE: mojo / primo setup


ORIGINAL: Dave McDonald

An OS 91 FX will definitely hover a Mojo 60, even at your altitude. But it won't have much reserve power to pull out of a hover, or have enough power to let you feel comfortable learning to hover.

I'd recommend choosing a more powerful engine.
I agree with the two stroke Master Dave 3D McDonald
Old 12-18-2008 | 12:44 AM
  #36  
plugin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bogota, COLOMBIA
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

Given that I've already got the engine, isn't there any other plane which will be correctly suited by the 91FX?
Old 12-18-2008 | 10:25 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Charlottesville, VA
Default RE: mojo / primo setup


ORIGINAL: plugin

Given that I've already got the engine, isn't there any other plane which will be correctly suited by the 91FX?
There's a profile bird called a Hyper Active that might be a good match for the 91 FX at your altitude. Should be able to come in right around 5 pounds, which is 8 to 12 ounces lighter than the MoJo 60, with a good bit more wing area than a MoJo 40. The problem is that kits are very hard to find. It's kitted by the guy who designed it and he does small production runs which are usually sold out as soon as he announces that he's doing a run. If you poke around a bit on the profile brotherhood site, I'm sure you can find out how soon they might be available.....or perhaps find someone will to part with a kit. Here's a couple of pics of one built by a legendary Bro.





Old 12-18-2008 | 10:33 AM
  #38  
tmproff's Avatar
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Humble, TX
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

Plugin, I wouldn't worry to much. Build the Mojo 60 ...try to keep it light and use the 91FX. If you are unhappy with it THEN go through the hassle of buying a new expensive saito 115 ($359). If you buy a larger engine than the 91 FX, I think you will start to run into weight issues. Maybe a .91FX + the tower muffler will give you the oomph you need
Old 12-18-2008 | 02:10 PM
  #39  
My Feedback: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Eldon, MO
Default RE: mojo / primo setup

If you're dead set on using a 91FX, then go ahead and build the Mojo 60. The 91FX will still give you plenty of power for basic 3D flying such as harriers, hovers, and torque rolls. Later on it might be worth experimenting with a Tower muffler, Ultrathrust, or a Mousse Can Pipe, but I'd start out with the stock muffler to make sure the engine throttles correctly for learning the basics. When it comes to 3D flying, a good throttling engine is far more valuable than raw top end power.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.